Dermot

I'm sorry, but I think you guys have lost me. As far as I know, the line weight scaling is always correct and I am not aware of any bugs in the program related to this. The important thing to remember is that the sizes you specify for the line style represent what is actually printed and depend on the current scale of your view. See attached pictures and plan for an example. This plan has a 10' line drawn with a line style setup as 1/4" dashes and 1/4" spaces. Plan is currently setup to be 1/4" : 1' scale in the Drawing Sheet Setup. Paper is setup to be 8.5x11 but this does not really matter. Dashes and spaces are both displayed as 1' when in the plan because of the current plan scale (but only when line weights are turned on or in print preview). When printed on 8.5x11 paper at scale they will actually be 1/4". And yes, I did print it out and measure it to verify the accuracy. Layout is setup to be 1" : 1" in Drawing Sheet Setup. I can't think of any good reasons to setup your layout to be anything different. Plan view was sent to the layout at 1/4" : 1' scale. Red dimension lines were drawn in layout and show dashes and spaces are actually 1/4". If you print out the layout on 8.5x11 paper at scale, the dashes and spaces will be 1/4" as expected. And yes, I did print it out and measure it to verify the accuracy. Hopefully, this makes sense and helps. line scale.plan line scale.layout

A picture of what you want would help. Stairs can wrap for landings and rooms that are not decks as long as they meet a number of other conditions. Make sure the stairs are going up to the platform. Make sure the height at the top of the stairs is the same height as the platform. If you still can't get it to work, then you should probably post a plan or contact tech support.

My comments about on screen versus what prints is a general comment that I believe applies to all views. When line weights are turned on, we scale the line styles the same way we would if you were printing the view directly. When line weights are turned off, we display the line styles to give you a reasonable representation of what the style looks like regardless of your current screen zoom factor. This allows you to zoom way in or way out and still see that you are using the appropriate line style. Mr. Wiley showed a cross section view and did not indicate how he was printing the view. If you print directly from a view, you should get what you see on the screen with print preview turned on. You can also change some settings in the print dialog which is why it has it's own print preview that should show you what you will get. If you send a view to a layout and then print from there, your view may or may not match the layout depending on a variety of settings. One important setting is whether or not the view is using the same scale in the layout box that it is using for the on screen display. If the scales are different, your line styles will not match. This also depends on other layout specific options like "Use Layout Line Scaling" which can override the view specific settings. I believe the program will remember your "Use Layout Line Scaling" setting between sessions. You may have turned it off at some point and not realized that it stayed off. Hopefully, this information is more clear and helps.

Just to clarify, line styles will not display accurately on the screen unless line weights are turned on. If you really want to see how they will look when you print, you might want to turn print preview on.

Try using a solid railing (aka half wall). You can specify the height you want for a solid railing in the specification dialog.

It's my understanding that Pamela wants to display just the lines between the cabinet boxes but not all of the face frame parts. Turning on the layer for the module lines will give you all of the lines and is not what she wants. In X11 and prior, you could get the box edge lines just by making the two adjacent cabinets have different materials. This was the "trick" I posted back in 2019. In X12, this behavior was changed, probably accidentally when we were working on other cabinet features, and changing the material no longer adds the box lines. Apparently, no one noticed or reported this to us until recently when Pamela contacted tech support. We will look into this more but I can't make any promises on when a fix might be available. For now, you can either turn on the module lines layer and get all of the lines or you could try making one cabinet as little as 1/16" deeper or offset from the wall (but these may have other unwanted side effects). You could also send your views to layout using plot lines and remove/add the lines you want but this is considerable more manual work than what worked before. I don't know if someone else can think of another way to get Pamela the results she wants.

See if this article helps: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/support/article/KB-00987/using-the-backup-entire-plan-project-tool-to-send-files-to-another-user.html

This looks like you put the vent in the main wall and then moved it up to the gable wall. Try putting the vent on the gable wall instead.

My apologies for the confusion. This must have been a mistake on my part. We write information in the plan file showing the last version it was saved in. I could have swore that I saw 22.2 but I see now that it is 22.3. I may have been looking at an earlier version of the plan, or someone else's plan, or simply had a senior moment.

Sorry to hear about your Dad. Wishing all the best to you and your family. Family obviously comes first, but if and when you get a chance, there are a couple of things related to Chief that you might want to do. As for your plan, your layout is a little bit unusual so it's not too surprising that you are finding some anomalies. When you encounter problems like this, I would encourage you to report them to our technical support team so that we can look into them to see if we can improve the program in these areas. You can find more info about contacting tech support here: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/support/ Also, I noticed that you are still using 22.2. I would strongly encourage you to update to the latest build (22.3) that was released in June. There were a number of good bug fixes that you are currently missing. For a full list of what was fixed in the latest update, please see these update notes: https://cloud.chiefarchitect.com/1/pdf/documentation/chief-architect-x12-update-notes.pdf

You should report problems like this to our technical support team. If they can confirm that the problem is on our end, they will then log a bug for our content team to correct the library. You can find info about contacting technical support here: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/support/

See the picture?

I don't think this is correct. See attached picture below. - The auto exterior dimensions are showing the wall widths. This was setup in the Auto Exterior Dimension Defaults on the Locate Objects panel. - The manual dimension is also showing the wall widths. This was setup in the Dimension Defaults on the Locate Objects panel. No extra points were manually added. - The End-to-End dimension will not show the wall width by default. By definition, an end-to-end dimension does not locate any intermediate points. You can manually add new locate points to an end-to-end dimension line to make it look exactly like the manual dimension line if you like.

Just to clarify... You can turn off all framing labels and callouts by turning off the "Framing, Labels" layer in your Layer Display Options. You can control whether or not your framing displays callouts or normal labels by opening the Schedule Specification dialog and turning off "Use Callout For Label" on the Label panel. You can control whether or not individual framing members display a label by opening the specification dialog and turning on Suppress Label on the Label panel.

Then you might want to upgrade to X12 (this should be free since you have SSA).

Chief Architect is not 20-20 and you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet. X12 is very stable and has been since it was originally released. The posts you saw in February may have been due to an isolated incident or possibly a problem with a driver update. Regardless, I would not hesitate to upgrade to X12 at this point. Please be aware that when you bring your X11 plans into X12 and save them that you will no longer be able to open them back up in X11. More information can be found in our migration guide: https://cloud.chiefarchitect.com/1/pdf/documentation/chief-architect-x12-migration-guide.pdf

There is no way to open an X12 plan in X11 or earlier. If you purchased a new license of the program directly from Chief Architect, it should have come with one year of SSA which would allow you to get the upgrade to X12 for free. Please contact our customer service or technical support team during our normal business hours for additional help.

Either your dimension defaults or your wall types are not setup correctly. You will get better answers if you post a plan demonstrating the problem. If all else fails, you can contact technical support during our normal business hours. There is a fee for this if you do not have SSA.

Try making the inside piece a different material. It doesn't actually need to look different, it just needs to be assigned to a separate material. So all you need to do is make a copy of the other material.

Performance problems can be particularly challenging to properly diagnose but are certainly a high priority for us. They can be the result of hardware or system problems, something that you have done that is very inefficient, or something that the program is doing that is very inefficient. Without an actual plan to test, then any speculation is probably a waste of time. If you want the program to work better, then I would encourage you to submit actual feature requests and/or bug reports when you find any problems. We don't monitor the Q&A forum looking for posts with hidden feature requests and bug reports. The least effective way to bring something to our attention would be to post some mostly unrelated comments on someone else's old thread. To make a feature request, you should make a post on the suggestions forum here: https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/forum/8-suggestions/ To report a problem in the program, you should contact our technical support team here: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/support/

The size of your dimensions are determined by your currently selected (or active) dimension default for the view you are in. Whether you are using the manual or any of the automatic dimension tools. Technically, the currently active default will determine which default the dimension is linked to when it is created. You can always change your dimension later to be linked to any dimension default you want. So if you want smaller dimensions, change your active dimension default before generating them or group select your existing ones and change the dimension default they are using. I recommend reviewing this video: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/videos/watch/92/using-the-automatic-interior-and-automatic-nkba-dimension-tools.html?playlist=92

X5 is not supported on Windows 10. Windows 10 was not available when X5 was released over 7 years ago. That said, you should be able to get X5 to run on windows 10 without too many problems. The biggest problems that people see usually have to do with video card drivers. Another thing you might want to consider is that upgrades are currently 20% off. More information can be found here: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/products/upgrade.html

Personally, I think it's easier to use a custom counter top or a cabinet since you can attach the molding directly to it. One advantage of using a cabinet, is that you can set the corner treatment to rounded and specify the width. One advantage of the counter top is that you have more control over the shape although it is possible to create an l-shaped column using a corner cabinet. See the picture below where the columns were done using wall cabinets with the face removed and the moldings added.

Yes, actually it is. We have a separate forum for the Home Designer products but this site is for all Chief Architect users, including Premier, Interiors, Lite, Viewer, students, and even potential future customers.

Looking at your picture, I can see at least 5 different moldings. If the main problem is the column, you might want to model this as a countertop, soffit, or cabinet pushed into the opening. If you have problems with the molding getting cutoff (because cabinet moldings can sometimes do weird things when they span rooms), you could create the column somewhere else and convert it into a symbol. Also, maybe this tech article can help: https://www.chiefarchitect.com/support/article/KB-00166/creating-and-editing-molding-profiles.html