DRAWZILLA

I think what I'm saying, is that, I really don't need to wait for the edge smoothing to kick in after the fact ,and my system doesn't have to put that regeneration at the end. I also don't have any resolution problems.

I didn't see where Suzy posted a plan. Let the great and wonderful OZ, , I mean Glen answer, he knows. For me sometimes I just manually draw them in.

Actually for me that" Edge smoothing when idol", slows me down. not sure why but I have a very fast system. So I leave it off.

I have seen this also but not hard to fix. I guess once the attic wall is there, you must delete it manually. I usually leave auto attic walls on until at some point along the way ,(never know exactly when that is), I turn them off and usually find a straggler left behind.

Joey, have you explored trying live 3d details yet. I haven't really got into that yet, but been thinking about it. with all the slice options we have now it might just work.

All I know is, that with every upgrade it takes a little more computer power. Never goes the other way.

thanks, sounds easy

Thanks Joe, I will be adding it to my template plan, and probably just copying it to the plan

I think Scott is looking for a video on how to add a new area in case you didn't have it in your list. Maybe

Is it ready for prime time now?

I always love it when I sometimes don't explain everything as well as I should, and someone picks up the slack Thanks for that Charles

Nice Joe, it covers everything you might need, can't wait.

yep ,I can go into my 2d cad drawing program to change details very easily and bring them back in.

if that doesn't work, let me know and I'll do it in X8 for you.

nice job, haven't played around with it yet myself.

yes I do, you have it all

Sense of humor, I like you already.

it's saved at no scale, not so sloppy and I can change them any time. I have thousands of cad details I brought with me when I first started Chief ,and I'm not about to re-draw all of those so it worked out good for me. Scaling is not an issue for me b/c I don't want anyone scaling the details, always dimension if it needs it.

your room dividers were located to the outer line of the deck I moved them under the out looker beams and made that room separate from the deck room, then it framed ok. you may have to add the side deck that I took away here is your plan fixed SMITH_ADDITION_7TH_IDEA.plan

I always put details directly from the lib. to the layout without any problems, its just you can scale it, which I don't want any, I just want it readable. no scaling details on my plans

Maybe it means Designs wacko, but it is good advice.

From a cad detail--it lets you scale it. / from the lib.--no scaling, just insert it, grab a corner, make it the size you want and re-save to the lib.

looked at those roof planes and they are cutting at the eaves for me.

Shouldn't have to do that though. BTW, I opened your plan in X9 and it looks fine without doing anything.

The sub-fascia controls the depth of the exposed overhang rafter area but does not control the ridges and hips ( ridges and hips are really just ridges in the DBX). This in my mind is wrong of Chief to lump them all into one item called ridges. They should be separate. For me, they are not the same sizes most of the time. Ridges and hip are structural and a 2x just won't work. Just make your rafters a 2x6 and ridge a 2x12 and you will see that they don't clip on the outside or the inside, they will show up in the camera views, inside and out. So to fix that for the camera views I have to make my ridges to match the rafters. Of course, we all know it's not built that way. Pleas Chief give us control of the ridges and hips to have separate control for each one. I have asked for a lot of years now.