X17, what's the consensus?

[Chrisb222]

Just now, robdyck said:

Chris, I should clarify that I wasn't trying to criticize you (my apologies if it read that way), but rather the overall concept of accepting errors for the sake of using AI...when and where that occurs. 

 

Yeah, well no one except you and alaskan son brought up the "concept" of accepting errors for the sake of using AI. Thanks for the apology.

[Steve_Nyhof]

I have used AI last year a bit trying to get one of my models to have landscaping. I guess that is what is being discussed here. AI has come a long way in a year, but it still fails. One thing I was enjoying was how it would produce fun results for alternatives of the model image and text entered. But I finally walked away because that is all it ever was for me, fun.

 

@robdyck said a lot in his last comment about landscape blocks, doing the work, etc.. I wouldn't trade my years of experience for something or someone else doing my job. I am afraid that the new generation will be depending on AI to produce their work. I guess it can just be another tool, but no thank you, I am enjoying figuring out the design as I move along.

 

I don't mean to show off by showing this (maybe a little), but I feel like I have really challenged myself and accomplished something fun for the client. Is that a fun lake house or what? And I couldn't image drawing it with any other software. 

  

[DBCooper]

Not really sure what AI has to do with X17 and didn't y'all beat that horse to death already? 

 

https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/topic/45722-i-think-im-done-rendering-in-chief/

 

 

[Steve_Nyhof]

8 minutes ago, DBCooper said:

Not really sure what AI has to do with X17 and didn't y'all beat that horse to death already? 

 

https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/topic/45722-i-think-im-done-rendering-in-chief/

 

 

We like beating dead horses now and then. I don't find this out of the norm for Chief forum discussions... they head south quite often