Renerabbitt

https://www.amazon.com/Blue-NAND-500GB-SSD-WDS500G2B0B/dp/B073SBX6TY

the other 1 is your NVME, it is a 500gb Western Digital NVME...for some reason your tech chose to make it a data drive i nstead of getting all the benefits of using it as a primary with your OS...mistake in my mind

can you screenshot your device manager disk drives?

I''m still waiting for them to make an affordable m.2 external enclosure- they probably have since last I checked

It would be a clever scam, 90 out of 100 consumers have never heard of an NVME drive and wouldn't know that it was missing and then could make a quick $100

hmm very fishy, I can't think of any reason other than to scam that your 256gb NVME would no longer be in your system-thats just flat out wrong...someone may have taken advantage of you

yeah I deleted that, realized I was wrong as soon as I hit enter, haha

I'm assuming thats your second drive?

nvme uses the m.2 slot, as opposed to a standard SATA port that an SSD would use...so if you upgraded than it should still be an NVME, though not all NVME's are created equal- they are still faster than SSDs by a lot

More RAM the better for utilizing it to increase page files on secondary slow drives and RAMdisk partitions for better read write speeds- not because I need more memory for CA(I need it for other programs running while CA is taking up its fair share of RAM)

give CA a call, shouldn't be happening..are you using the SAM method? maybe you have a texture file causing problems

Laughing because you have an NVME drive in your computer, and your computer is a gaming machine- haha, or is that what you are saying, that you went with a gaming machine? I have other posts about creating RAMdisks and setting your UNDO as well as the user library to the RAMdisk as you have plenty of RAM. your CA should be installed on your NVME primary drive, along with anything else associated with CA. I'm surprised you can't tell the difference, what did you upgrade from? At the very least you should notice that windows fires up really fast and that programs open up really fast then again, thats kind of my point, I'd prefer a touch convertible for the marginal performance increase

CA does a ton of read writing and memory spikes galore...whereas you just wont see that much difference between the same gfx/mem/HD hardware system with one being a 4ghz 8 core and the other a 3ghz quad core...YET, you'll see a world of difference between an SSD with low ram vs an NVME primary, SSD secondary, with tons of RAM and a RAMDISK plus a larger page file on the second drive. An ultrabook, setup with a lot of RAM and NVME's can smoke a gaming computer in PRODUCTIVITY in my opinion...I am so much faster on an iPad remotely connected to my laptop than on my laptop itself....b/c of the touch screen. see screener: 20 min sample of me working and CPU usage is very low on the whole but read writes and HD activity are huge

I think I've changed my opinion on this...I bought the best gaming laptop I could afford and yes it has served me well.. now 5 years later and it still works flawlessly I realize that the graphics card was not necessary for what I need my laptop to do...and really,the heavy lifting comes from an NVME drive and lots of ram. So if I were to do it all over again I would buy a small and lightweight, convertible touch-screen lappy with room for ram and an M.2 NVME. CA works wonderfully in a touchscreen environment and for takeoffs/as-builts the keyboard is rarely used- especially with a Bluetooth laser.

consider the NVME for operating system- it makes a HUGE difference I also screen clip imported PDF' and save as .pngs, or use a software to reduce size...PDFs always cause slowdowns. I don't have much experience moving items in sections so i can't speak on that and certainly...cheers!

There could be more to your issues than hardware allocation...imported PDFs can drastically slow down your system as well as a ton of CAD blocks or high poly count objects ..maybe post a layout file that is causing an issue. NVME's drastically improve CA in my opinion...as well as everything else in windows. I also use a ramdisk to , at the very least, store undos...I use it for much more than that I personally do not use layout for anything other than a print application. ..my title block is in .plan, my layout remains blank until time of final print...previews are in plan only.

CA simply does not need to utilize that much RAM- you'd see better performance by upgrading read write speeds, i.e. an m.2 NVME. Also your CPU clock speed is more important than number of cores for said issues. Could always see more benefit from creating a backed up ram disk for library/archives/undo's or increase your page file for a HDD etc... probably see better performance than trying to force allocation of ram

Afternoon Suzy, First off thanks for dropping a question in my direction- in future I will respond promptly if you use the "quote selection" tool as it will ping me Onto your question, their was an ongoing conversation about this in the Beta forums so I will try and quote what I wrote to DianneDSC over there which should answer your question...in short yes its possible, ideally you need to setup cloud permissions so that each computer has exclusive control to force overwrite its respective library...see below quote: On 3/5/2019 at 7:39 AM, DianneDSC said: @Renerabbitt I am having some issues getting this set up. I had a conflicted copy message from dropbox on my computer when another user made a change to their user library on their computer. How is this working for you? Perhaps I have something set up incorrectly. Any insight will be appreciated. There are 2 of us that need to have access to each others user library. Thank you. Renerabbitt wrote: Its working well for me perfectly thus far so let's check this out... First up let me be clear about how I am using this- 1. I use 3 cloud services ea. with multiple accounts. one cloud service is being used with two accounts to sync up my clouds and nothing else. 2. Account 1 is sharing Desktop library with account 2 and account 2 is sharing its main library with account 1- this may not be Necessary, it's how I first set it up. You can create a symlink to a symlink which could avoid this scenario if needed added control of sync. 2. OneDrive account 1 is used for only syncing user libraries, nothing else. It remains off for most of the day(not active) 3. I have my OneDrive auto scheduled to only turn it on at the end of a day 4. My desktop User library is placed at lets say z:/CA/Desktop User Library/. My Desktop machine has its main user library sym-linked to that location. My Laptop has this library sym-linked to manufacturer libraries. 5. My laptops user library is placed at z:/CA/Laptop User Library/. My Desktop has a sym-link to this user library in its manufacturer libraries. My Laptop has a sym-link to this library as its main user library. 6. What this does is make it so that on the laptop the desktop user library never changes and thus has no reason to be synced, and on the desktop the same is true(inverse respectively) First off do you both have file locking selected in your preferences under file management? uncheck that. next, maybe we need to establish some method or rather protocol for overwriting...I'm not using dropbox for this purpose but maybe take a look at this article: https://products.secureserver.net/products/off/help/OFF_Program/OFF_Program/off_program/settings/setting_options_for_dropbox.htm You want this setup so that his/her machine will force an over write of his/her library only...same goes for you and your library. That may not be necessary- try this : Add a folder at the root of ea. user library designating which library it is..e.g/ Dianne's User library Dianne has her user library in z:/CA/Dianne_s library on her machine and create a symlink from her library to dropbox:/Dianne_s Library/ George has his user library in x:/CA/George_s library on their machine and create a symlink in dropbox:/George_s Library/ Dianne has a symlink in mfr libraries on her machine that links to dropbox:/George_s Library/User Library.calib George has a symlink in mfr libraries on their machine that links to dropbox:/Dianne_s Library/User Library.calib Let me know how it goes- I think I covered my use scenario and why it's working- and it makes me very happy not to be messing with this anymore, i have no sync issues to date On 3/6/2019 at 8:31 AM, DianneDSC said: @Renerabbitt Thank you for your help. I have it all so that we are seeing each other's user library on each other's laptops. However, if one of us adds something to or makes a change to our personal library, it is not reflecting on the other person's laptop. Based on your comment above, is this the correct behavior? Or does your user libraries update and sync when your one drive is activated at the end of the day so the next day everyone can see and access each other's changes? Even after closing CA and reopening it, our library changes are not being updated to the other person's laptop. I used the process below: Renerabbitt wrote: Yes I only sync at the end of the day to update the days changes. Ideally you would schedule this so that no user is in CA as that would avoid naming conflicts. this way of setting things up simply ensures that you wont lose your library from conflicts..it doesn't ensure that the other persons library on your machine wont have conflicts. But even with conflicts you will see an old version of his library and a new version of yours. since his user library in your machine will never be changed from your end, at some point his updates will show up when their is no inherent file locking. the ultimate goal i think would be to figure out how to force overwrite which i had a link to in the other post. this would make it so that no matter what state his user library is in, when his dropbox sees a new user library from him it will force overwrite all other versions of that file instead of creating a copy.

Mods should just pin a laptop thread to the top of the pile, haha

Am I missing something...I have always wondered, is there a way to tab to the dimension input on temp dimensions, or is hover-over-select the only method?

Just wanted to chime in and say that this is NOT an issue. This is HOW PBR works- it requires light sources, nothing will ever look accurate in PBR without proper lighting. This defeats the whole purpose of PBR. Most if not all other rendering software's require user added lights. without light there is no physics sort to speak. I see no point in using PBR with fake generated point lights. put a light in the room, no major living spaces have 0 lights- takes two seconds. You'd spend way longer trying to figure out settings just to find that you will have to modify all settings again once you've added lights

exactly- which is why I put image files or pdfs that are linked in plan into the same folder as the plan and layout file...same as fonts etc.

HA,I woke up this morning thinking it was thursday..DOH! I beat you to my spelling error, haha...I don't write much anymore, that part of my brain is turning to mush. yes re-linked...I didn't come up with that method, it was shared with me by a long-time user as a standard established some 30 years ago in a CAD program. Avoids potential "forgetting to link" scenarios...I used to do it your way for sure.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!! I FORGOT AUDIO, DAMNIT- I WAS LAUGHING AT THIS 2019-03-05 12-40-04.mp4

my method does not require this and is much simpler IMO..see above...only thing that needs tweaking is saved plan views with reference files...the reference files need to be changed to the new location. I NEVER use save as. when copy pasting the root folder the associations are inherent- no plan linking needed. I almost downvoted...I'm a downvote virgin