-
Posts
1928 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Chrisb222
-
Going through a plan now using this method. Some pain but with keyboard shortcuts it's quicker than retyping. Thanks for the tip!
-
Thanks for the report. Does Home Designer have the PBR rendering technique? If so how does it handle that?
-
Yw. I don't use that to grab paint chips, as I said it shifts the hue a little, but it works great for grabbing anything on your screen, like blending the color from one material into another where there's not another easy way to do so
-
Glad you figured it out. Changing colors/textures can be challenging, especially when two computers handle it differently. But I wanted to mention, one possible alternative method to getting a manufacturer library color into a texture using Define Material dialog... see the eyedropper in the lower left of your Select Color table? Have the color you want visible in your library, and use that to grab it. Caveat: At least on my system, that eyedropper color selector can produce a slight color shift.
-
You can also do it by overlapping two layout boxes in layout using copy/paste hold position, and changing the plan view or layer set for the dimension view. Like the earlier method, it takes some set up but once your plan file had the necessary layer sets and plan views, creating the layout views would be fast. Here's a sample of two layout boxes, one cropped down to show a partial room, with the other showing only dimensions:
-
When you select a roof plane, these buttons allow you to move the display of the plane to another level:
-
Opening Indicator layer
- 9 replies
-
- hinge
- swing direction
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
doors with adjustable height of bottom panel and lites that can be set
Chrisb222 replied to DianeP's topic in General Q & A
Like this? Simpson Doors bonus catalog But yeah parametric doors that worked like windows would be great! -
https://appleinsider.com/inside/rosetta-2
-
Thanks for the report. I for one am very interested. I'll make a few comments in reply, just to add to the conversation. It's my understanding that Rosetta 2 is a little different than the original Rosetta in that it translates the software when it's installed, not while it's running. So Rosetta doesn't actually run when you're using the software, only when you first install it, which is supposed to make it faster. At least that's my understanding. I was afraid of this. I don't think it's the RAM or the graphics. In my experience a translated software program can suffer slowdowns when it has to communicate with objects and features that reside outside the software. In the case of library objects, I assume the software is having to reach out to the native system architecture to retrieve those objects (files). I suspect the same type of slowdown might occur when accessing the font list or other system-level assets. Yeah I think that's because everything's running in the system's native language. Thank you. Good conversation. But shoot, I was hoping the M1 was so fast that there wouldn't be any sluggishness running in Rosetta. Oh well, apparently it's "easy" (they say) for developers to port a dual-binary version of their software that will run native on the M1. Hopefully Chief is doing that soon...
-
Once I had my toolbars all set, I went to the folder where the custom toolbars are located, made a copy of the file and stored it in another location. When the toolbars go wacky I just close the program, remove and throw away the corrupted file, make another copy of the good file and move it into the proper folder. Relaunch the program and all is good. But for me this only happens once every two or three months so it's not real annoying. Not using chief right now so can't give the file and folder names/locations.
-
It will do that naturally. Nothing wrong with the original design, water-runoff-wise.
-
One example of each type of window only makes sense. We have the ability to specify all the same settings as a normal window, why bloat the library with a zillion sizes? I did look through my Andersen library though, and found it odd they didn't include the 100 Series single-hung. All I found were awning, casement, gliding, and picture. I don't use mfgr window catalogs anyway. Can't specify them as Default.
-
If I had the inclination to spend 10 grand on the latest MacPro, the goofy looking cabinet would probably be a deal breaker. I'm super stoked that a <$700 mini has the power it does. Anxiously awaiting the word that X13 will run natively, or at least through Rosetta. Apparently Universal 2 allows developers to easily convert Intel-based apps to a format compatible with the M1, and which will run on either, much like the original universal binary developed when Apple moved from PPC to Intel. I have no idea how "easy" it actually is, or how it would compare to software being written natively... if that's even a thing. But from what I read it's faster than running through Rosetta.
-
Andersen sizing is whack!
-
Ok
-
Then you might want to elaborate on that in your suggestion. I read it and had no idea what you were asking for.
-
And that's with two web browsers with multiple tabs, preview, calculator, Amazon music and other apps running in the background simultaneously. The Mac mini is about the best bang for the buck going and I'm anxious to get my hands on one that blows away almost every other configuration except a $20,000 gaming system.
-
That's not accurate. My 2014 2.6GHz core i5 8g ram Mini runs Chief just fine, and two 24-inch monitors out of the box. You might want to check some reviews on the m1, it's not really a lightweight computer at all.
-
Looking to get a mini M1. Reviews seem to say that even programs running through Rosetta, like CA, are faster than running native on the Intel chip. Is this your experience?
-
Start - End
-
Design-build. Thats what I do. It's a fantastic niche if you can get established. Training? Certification? Hahaha. Around here, training is spending a couple years fetching sky hooks, pipe holes, and board stretchers, and certification is hanging a 4' level from your gun rack. If your area requires those, I feel for ya. Knowing HOW to build a house is key to convincing people to sign your contract, IMO. I've built many, many custom homes for people who ran from another larger builder because the owner openly admitted he had no idea how to build a house. Being small and doing some of the work yourself keeps building trust with your community. Getting connected with a strong realtor can help get you off the ground. It sucks to pay the commission but if you're good you won't need them for long. Word of mouth is still the best advertising, if you want to stay small. I don't have any advertising, a website, or even a current business card. Heck sometimes I want to change my phone number, too much demand. Good subs are also key. Bottom line, the requirements will be dictated by the area you want to serve. If you're in the US look up your state's contractor's business licensing requirements, then to the local county, city, or other governing body, and go from there. They can guide you into whatever licensing, bonding, etc you're going to need. It can be a great gig but keep in mind you're never off the clock and every project is a potential time bomb, so if your phone rings on Christmas day and that house you just finished has a flooded basement, don't say I didn't warn you. Yeah, ask me how.
-
Manual roof planes
-
Can't think of why this would be a problem, even if gas. Without seeing the floorplan, I would prefer it accessed via the bathroom rather than a bedroom.
-
Yes true that's a limitation but my shelving company doesn't do angles either soo...