Doug_N Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 When doing instructions for framing a roof I realized that the CA framing model is somewhat strange for the outlook detail. Maybe I am doing something wrong but here is what I was hoping for, VS what CA is generating. Something like what I was expecting. How Chef actually models it. Here is a clip from a framing manual. And finally here is a cross section of what I was hoping for and what I got. So a couple of questions: 1) How have you detailed outlooks - what is the practice in your area? 2) Have I overlooked some setting in CA that does this automatically? Edit: When playing with the roof structure DBX here is what I discovered. Here is the original DBX And here is a revised DBX Swapping the dimensions for width and depth. And a much better result! This still would require a note about notching the rafters I suppose or manually reducing the depth of the rafter to make the outlook members more like purlins. Any comments? Outlook Framing.plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glennw Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 I think Chief does what you want OOB. Post a plan so we can see what you are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug_N Posted January 1, 2021 Author Share Posted January 1, 2021 Hi Glenn, Happy New Year! Not really if you look at the details that I have posted. The way that the outlooks were modelled were out of correct rotation. Why? I have no idea because when I fiddled with the roof structure DBX it stopped doing it, and rotated them to the correct angle. The OOTB copy still requires notching the gable rafter. Most framers around here reduce the depth of that rafter so that the outlook can cross the rafer without cutting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 This is a long standing bug Doug. Not sure I remember all the nuances, but I believe it's always triggered by having Auto Rebuild Roofs toggled on and Automatically Build Roof Framing toggled off. To fix, you have to group select the offending items (using Match Properties makes this quick) and then Cut/Paste Hold Position. I would also recommend turning OFF Auto Rebuild Roofs or you'll just have to keep fixing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glennw Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 Yes, I can duplicate this by turning off auto rebuild roof framing, auto roofs on, editing the plan, and then selecting a roof and then Build framing for Selected Objects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 6 minutes ago, glennw said: Yes, I can duplicate this by turning off auto rebuild roof framing, auto roofs on, editing the plan, and then selecting a roof and then Build framing for Selected Objects. You can also just hit Undo or Save and reopen the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneDavis Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 I wrote up a suggestion last fall to be able to manually draw lookouts. It might be moot if we can draw purlins in X13. As for extending the top plate of the framed gable wall, to reach the subfascia, Chief won't do this, but you can, when editing the wall framing detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kbird1 Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 20 hours ago, Alaskan_Son said: This is a long standing bug Doug. Not sure I remember all the nuances, but I believe it's always triggered by having Auto Rebuild Roofs toggled on and Automatically Build Roof Framing toggled off. To fix, you have to group select the offending items (using Match Properties makes this quick) and then Cut/Paste Hold Position. I would also recommend turning OFF Auto Rebuild Roofs or you'll just have to keep fixing it. IIRC you noted this action in your Roof Purlin Video about a year ago ? or at least in that Thread..... M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NRST8TRKR Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 I know things are done differently in other parts of the country but this is the way we do our lookouts. 2x6 fly rafter with 2x6 lookout nailed to the end truss. Sheathing applied and then set on wall. Hope all have a Happy New Year, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug_N Posted January 2, 2021 Author Share Posted January 2, 2021 12 minutes ago, NRST8TRKR said: I know things are done differently in other parts of the country but this is the way we do our lookouts. 2x6 fly rafter with 2x6 lookout nailed to the end truss. Sheathing applied and then set on wall. Hope all have a Happy New Year, Ken Hi Ken, Where is your part of the country? I have seen it done this way in our locality here in Ontario Canada, and it is called a ladder outlook system. The inspectors are cautious about it because to resist vertical loading past the gable it relies upon the pull-out strength of nails resisting shear loads. I think they make the builders install gang nail plates at the gable joint. Do you have uplift problems with wind loading with this construction method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 Just now, Doug_N said: Hi Ken, Where is your part of the country? I have seen it done this way in our locality here in Ontario Canada, and it is called a ladder outlook system. The inspectors are cautious about it because to resist vertical loading past the gable it relies upon the pull-out strength of nails resisting shear loads. I think they make the builders install gang nail plates at the gable joint. Do you have uplift problems with wind loading with this construction method? We do basically the same thing and have no problems whatsoever. I would note that I only use that method when the barge overhang is under 2 ft. though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NRST8TRKR Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 Hello Doug, I am in the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia No problem with uplift or inspectors here (so far). Never know when that might change. In the case of a Prow Gable (which is only occasionally for the guys I work with) we build the gable low and run the look outs back to the next truss. Ken We just call it a Chicken Ladder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug_N Posted January 2, 2021 Author Share Posted January 2, 2021 6 minutes ago, NRST8TRKR said: Hello Doug, I am in the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia No problem with uplift or inspectors here (so far). Never know when that might change. In the case of a Prow Gable (which is only occasionally for the guys I work with) we build the gable low and run the look outs back to the the next truss. Ken 13 minutes ago, Alaskan_Son said: We do basically the same thing and have no problems whatsoever. I would note that I only use that method when the barge overhang is under 2 ft. though. Thanks for that Ken and Michael. Good to know. Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_Winsor Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 Here's how I handled the lookouts on my duplex garage. No worry about shear load strength or sagging since the 2 x 8 fascia boards are sitting on the wall top plate. 12 hours ago, Doug_N said: ...I think they make the builders install gang nail plates at the gable joint. Not to digress, and I don't claim to know more than Simpson, but as a woodworker the notion of gang nail plates drives me crazy. Nails and nail plates are intrusive wood splitters. Unlike fastening metal, when joining wood more is not necessarily better. And if you really want to make a secure joint a few well places screws will hold better than a forest of nails. JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now