GeneDavis

OK so I found one, the only one, in the Chief library. It is in the GE manufacturers library, and installs as expected. Don't know what is different about the symbol, and have not explored to find an answer to why my imported one won't work the same, but for now, this does the job.

I did not look in the Chief library for the 18" wide appliance I want, so I imported one from the 3D Warehouse, set its origin so it places where I want in the y axis, and am stuck on how to delete or alter the sides so it looks correct. See my dialog pages, attached. I need to either lose the cabinet sides or chop them at the toe. If I set toe height at 4" it shrinks the appliance height by 4" at the bottom, so that is not the way.

I like to write these posts with as much description as I can cram in the space. I could have said "window problem" but no, I'm stuck with my behavior. So here, look at this pic and you'll see what I mean. I have a workaround, but really, do I have to?

All these were done with the window spec dialog. I do a CAD detail from view and draw polylines and lines to get the dimensions needed, but the numbers are used in the window spec dialog.

Open it up and examine materials. I have found the Kohler models to have been done all in same, and it's always white. You need one material for the metal, and one for the glass globes. You'll need a SU subscription and some training in SU use to be able to edit the model to get what you need. I use SU a lot, but mine is the old SU Make 2017 version one could have on one's own drive. SU is a cloud app now.

If it comes into Chief with different materials (and the SU modeler should have done this), a Chief user can change the materials to whatever looks right. I did not download the model and try it. It's got a ridiculously high surface count and I would not want it in one of my Chief files.

There is a long thread in Suggestions about extensions outboard of railings for porches, but we do workarounds now, and I was wondering how others approach this. Here is a covered porch, with slab floor, attached to a house on monolithic slab. I wanted the porch edge to go 6" beyond the post-to-beam railing line. The railing is an OOB interior railing wall, specified the way I want it for the post and beam structure, and the extension is a molding. Because I did not edit the railing wall makeup which comes OOB as a framed wall with sheetrock faces, I needed to paint the 1/2" of sheetrock at edge of slab, which I did at the same time I painted the molding the same concrete texture as the slab. I know if this goes to con docs I'll be using CAD in the plan view and detail sections, and I'm OK with that. My workaround here was quick and easy and gets the results in 3D for the client to see. How would you do this?

Four minutes for the large dormer, but it's not right with the roof intersects on its right side. This is all just to approximate the shape of the mass. Your field measurements will be used to tune it to a true as-built.

"Way to set a minimum 10" depth at walk line for winders" If you mean a setting that builds winders to this criteria, then no, there is none. And I gotta ask, because I have built a lot of stairs, who needs to see tread counts and riser counts on plans? It could not be a plans examiner, or could it? They are interested in things like maybe pitch and minimum tread depth, and certainly overhead clearances, but counts?

I drew a 32 x 38 box house and threw three roof planes on it to approximate your basic configuration. See the dimensions on the plan view, showing the roof intersect points? You need to get yours to align with what you measured in the field. And this, which I learned from a Chiefer that used to post with a lot of excellent solutions to those with problems. When working in 3D, use vector view, turn off color, and toggle patterns OFF. You get a much more clear view of the roof planes.

You know how to use the join-roof tool, right? And you have watched this? https://www.chiefarchitect.com/videos/watch/6127/gull-wing-roof.html?playlist=95 And your field measurements tell you exactly where, front to back, that roof intersect line is, the intersection of low pitch and higher pitch? Dimension this in plan view when you have joined the planes, and compare it to the field measurement. The high ridge location is right where you measured it? As for the gable, this vid might be helpful. https://www.chiefarchitect.com/videos/watch/25/drawing-roofs-manually.html?playlist=95 Using text, annotate your plan to show your field measurements, then close the plan and post it here. Someone will properly model the roof arrangements in ten minutes.

If you are going for an accurate as-built Chief model, you will need to field measure to determine the roof pitches and roof plane elevations. Fascia heights, ridge heights, etc. Have you done this? Such field measurements will result in getting the roof intersect line, of the front gull-wing two-pitch roof, located as-built.

Plop one where it will model OK, explode it, then select all of it and move it where you want. Delete whatever hole in roof it generated.

Just input your scale info in the print dialog. You know how this works, right? Whose X12 are you using? Chief has not sold that for four years.

You cannot use a ceiling plane for this, or the ceiling definition with an airgap material spacer, because they stop the sheetrock at the wall intersect and delete it from the structural ceiling above. Here is a pic showing a ceiling plane doing its thing (not wanted) and a solid painted "drywall" beyond which behaves OK for your need. You can manually frame above it and place recessed lighting, manually locating the light elevations as needed. Recessed lights don't cut drywall (I've suggested they do for better photorealism), Chief models them as paste-ons.

How does it handle the various ways to do 3-drawer bases? There are three drawers all same height. There are one shallow over two deep. And two shallow over one deep.

Start at the top floor, go down.

Mr Google the AI bot directed me here, also. I get far better results chasing answers to Chieftalk topics using Google than the search here.

Or turn off framing for doing renders. You really only need it for doing the framing parts of con docs.

As you can see from Mark's reply, there is a lot to do to get to where the Chief documents can get used to build a cabinet order that is exactly right for the job, with everything built and arriving ready to install without errors. Are you the one placing orders for the Medallion cabinets? Can you describe how it's done now? Examine Mark's schedule, the second one, and the level of detail he's added in the remarks column. Are you doing this now for your projects?

I didn't download your plan, but your pics don't show any elements of a floor frame, and rims are part of the floor frame. And of course, if your floor structure is a slab, there are no rims. So define the floor structure if it's wood framed, and reframe.

Top of plate to top chord top, at baseline (which you should always locate at main layer outside).

I got the no-posted-plan blues. Hey @h82fail, learn how to zip or shrink the plan file so it is under 15 bigs, then close Chief, and attach here to a post. If it's huge, it's likely so because it's full of symbols. Strip it of all save the structure. Windows and doors are OK. And where'd "fail" come from? Wouldn't you rather be a winner with this software?

I do wall art as a 3D solid and "paint" it (apply material) that is the image I want. These "pictures" won't display in Chief's 2D wall elevations, which default as vector views. Bob is showing you a standard view of a wall. Just change your view type from vector to standard.