GeneDavis

You can make a symbol of the numbers readily, using Sketchup's 3D characters, then import as an electrical symbol into Chief. I used a point light spaced out maybe 8 inches away and dialed it way down in intensity to do this raytrace.

I tried and failed and moved on, but here was the goal. A simple 8-foot deep foundation with a 4" slab floor sitting atop the 16" wide x 8" deep footings. A plain studwall right down the center, sitting on the slab, the slab thickened under the wall, 4" more thickness, 16" wide. Chief X8 kept trying to convert my footing-slab arrangement to a monopour thing. I could get a footing UNDER the slab where the wall went, but I could not thicken the slab and leave it otherwise unaffected, that is, being a separate pour from footings, and sitting atop them.

Doodled this up in Sketchup and uploaded to the 3D Warehouse. It is modeled to scale after the Duravent model 46DVA, which is sold in aluminum, copper, and stainess steel. Search for "termination cap sconce" and you'll see it. Enjoy!

Chief has the OOB margins set for 1" all around, and this works OK for me for 1/4" scale. I've proportionalized the margins for the larger detailing scales of 1/2", 3/4", 1", 1-1/2", and 3". I go for all anno text height at 3/32" on layout. Titles are bigger. I use the text box corners for aligning text when doing detailing and annotation, and this seems to be OK spacing. What works for you?

I cut the door schedule and the window schedule from the first floor plan view and then pasted them into a CAD detail window. No jumps since. This plan has problems. They may be the result of me using material regions to do gable-end board and batten detailing. It is the only part of the modeling that did not go well, and I suspect it has something to do with the schedule blowouts. A couple of times when trying to cut a material region, I would do the polygon, then do the conversion to an MR, spec the layers, and the MR would not appear at all. I would look and lo and behold, I would have an object 12,000 inches to the east in outer space, and it would be the MR.

Yeah, I've got user input in comments, the rightmost field. What's that comment field for, if not the user to write something in? Can't recall doing a CR at the end of any, but I'll go and re-do. Thanks, Mark. I'll report to service in Idaho, too.

Good idea, Perry. I'll try that. I started a ticket with support and sent them the file.

I have a window schedule and a door schedule in my plan, and Chief is blowing the right end out to infinity. Not when first generated, but later when I work with the plan. I did schedule-to-text and that is what I am putting on my layout, but in order to keep the unit numbers (which are only there when schedules are generated) I have to keep the live schedules. Even those got their right margins extended, but not to the moon as the live schedules. The pic attached shows how this looks. The little bit of plan seen is floorplan surrounded by a terrain of about 120 x 120 feet.

How can one easily toggle in and out of this? I want it off when zooming way close.

There's a Chief training video showing how to drop the floorframe into the foundation, and even though it is from a few versions ago, it is worth watching. The ledge detail is not covered, though, but that is just the pony-wall thing. I've seen builds done with the detail done, no ledge, and the joists hung with top-mount hangers. A guy we know who does the designs always raises the foundation where the front entry is located, so you don't have to step up to enter the house. It's a feature I like.

Won't work for me, Kevin. See the attached. Chief only exports in a spreadsheet format with extension as shown, and Docs won't import that type.

I don't have Excel but use Sheets a lot.

Right, Scott. Today we have a layer called main layer only, and maybe we need another called pony wall switch. This is a common need for any plan with a split foundation, one part crawlspace, part full depth. I'll do a suggestion when back next week.

Need to do this. I did a foundation wall as a pony, upper framed, lower concrete. Want the lower showing for foundation plan, but the upper for the framing plan. Can't try anything 'cause I'm traveling, sitting at gate 32 waiting out a delay.

Those who draw roofs like this should be required to work in the framing crew when they are framed and sheathed. And then with the roofers for all that extra valley and hip work.

I've live window and door schedules in a plan, and without my input, they balloon way out on their right ends. They have been expanding so far out it is ridiculous. I delete and regenerate and still get the behavior. What's up?

How do you all deal with this. I get these lines that are annoying, when taking camera views and elevation views.

I'm about ready to send in a ticket, but first, let me present it here. On the outside of exterior walls, I am using the tool to do some board-and-batten accents on gables. A view of the house is attached, plus a zipped up copy of the plan. All worked well for the upper gable. For each gable, the boards that surround the field and battens are done with p-line solids. I used the material region tool to do the 1/4-inch thick field panels and the battens that face them. The tool worked as expected for the upper gable, but for the one at the end of the extended eave shed, the tool would not produce the battens. It is easy to reproduce the error I got. One selects a batten, converts it back to a polyline, then tries to use the material region tool to get the effect. You'll see the bug in action. My workaround worked, 'cause that is what workarounds do. But am I missing something about this tool, which I have used very little? Cabin 2 bed 1 and half bath.zip

Since each plank is a solid, anything with knots is going to look ridiculous, in that every plank will be a clone of all the others. So, do any of the wood textures, no knots, work?

What do you do for this? I want to get realistic-looking light effects under the wall cabinets and atop the counters. I turned down the wattage, but haven't played with the cone angle or drop-off rate. Shadows, no.

The client needs a real architect.

What I'll do is set the newel height to 1 inch so the three are still there in planview, then do p'line solids drawn over them with heights set where needed.

I used the OOB settings for "Indoor High Quality" and getting this, after an overnight of passes. Why the soft-focus? I am raytracing again, this time unchecking the "use focal blur" box in the advanced panel. Early results are better. But why would the OOB settings have that blur? And what use could the blur have? Does fuzziness have a place in architectural rendering?

Maybe I drew the staircase wrong. See my pics. I go up a run to a landing, and make a turn from there to the top. Simple arrangement, gotta be as common as dirt. Chief treats the whole staircase as one, in that I cannot specify newel heights for the various pieces of it. When I set the newel height for the balustrade at the bottom tread, it is too tall for the horizontal balustrade across the edge of the landing. How is this best done to get section-controllable newel heights?

No, that isn't it, but thanks. Here's the plan. The roofs that won't box are the two main 12:12 planes. The gable overhangs are done as separate planes because they do not get the boxed detail. Edit: my problem has been solved. Not sure why it was solved, but all is OK with the eaves. Edit 2: no, the problem is not solved. The archived file was OK, but the one I have zipped and is here has the problem. Edit 3: forced a fix by unchecking "default to overhang" and entering 24" in the distance box. Cabin 2 bed 2 bath.zip