GeneDavis

Describe "footprint." Is the first image from a layout or plan file? Which?

I do this routinely and the notch for slab is 3" which is easy for the concrete guy with 2 thicknesses of 2x lumber. In the pic attached you can see how I used a molding to fill the void, 3" wide x slab depth thick, at the slab edge, because Chief only models the slab to the foundation line. Maybe there is something I am missing.

Some of my work involves producing wall framing elevations that get used by a components plant that panelizes. And that means I care about getting ROs correctly done for the windows and doors. If your work involves windows generically sized and you've no idea what they'll buy for the jobs you draw, you can stop right here. This post ain't for you. The common product line is series 400 for my clients, whether it is double hungs, casements, sliders, or patio doors. What tripped me up on a recent job was this: Andersen Series 400 casements are factory built as doubles and even triples, with a mullion between sash that is slimmer than two side jambs sandwiched together. See the section pics here. See in the pic of the vertical integral join section (a.k.a. mullion) that there is an 11/16" wide part of it on the exterior side beween sash? Now look at the way Andersen depicts a double casement on their sizing chart page, and how one is depicted in Chief using Andersen's catalog, which I just downloaded in put into my library. Chief on left, Andersen size chart on right. See any mull between? Without using anyone's Chief catalog for windows, which was before today, I'd make a double anything, awning, casement, doublehung, or fixed, by inserting two and jamming them together. Then, to be sure of my widths, I'd look up online how the maker does simple nonstructural factory joins, and get the 1/16" or 1/8" or zero or whatever, and they're all different, Pella, Andersen, Marvin, etc., but I'd have it. And if you look it up for Andersen for series 400, it's a piece of something 1/8" thickness. I did not say up front, but there will be math, and here it is. Wanting a double casement in Andersen's 400 series at "24" width, or two foot four inches, the chart tells me each unit has a frame width of 28 3/8" and the mull join detail I found (and am making a mistake using it) shows 1/8", I join them then gap them 1/8" and blockmull them and have a unit that is 2 * 28.375 + .125 = 56 7/8" unit width. Gong! goes the bell. Wrong. Wrong? Because the single-unit-build-with-the-the-join-mull ends up with a unit size 7/8" narrower, or 56". I can hear the carpenters doing the window install yelling !WTF! already. So if you are a picky guy or gal, and you care about these little things, beware. Neither Chief nor Andersen depicts a double casement properly in 2D elevation views, and you gotta fake widths to get the right size in your model and on your con docs. Finally, look carefully at the manufacturer's sizing charts to see if they are building multiples this way.

I think I have it now. The solution is to make sure the schedule dialog box is opened and to make sure the "Include options" is all set correctly so as to NOT include all floors and ONLY include the current floor, which Chief has set to the floor on which the schedule was generated to appear.

No, there's no way the note schedule begins afresh when I go to another floor. Are all us users happy with this notes function? Is there some easy way to do one schedule per plan view floor?

Not working. I populated the 2nd floor plan with notes that rang up 1 through 7, went to the second floor plan, placed a note, and it numbered it 8 and put it in the schedule of second floor notes.

I feel like I'm on a merry go round and cannot get off. I have two floors and a foundation done as a slab with stemwalls. Schedule numbers get generated in single digit format, but then I try notes on another floor and start getting X.Y format. Do I have to first do floor-specific plan views to get this to work?

How is this done. Help this windows dummy, please.

Thanks, everybody!

I gotta finish this thing today, and this one is stopping my progress. See the pic, attached. The truss TR-9 won't draw all the way to the subfascia. The red line is where I want to pull it but it won't pull past the hip. Help! Properly drawn, I'll then pull TR-11 and TR-5 to connect to TR-9. Here is the file. 85 mb but this should work. Doering.plan

We've been down this road with this exact plan.

Nested gable was the topic, so I sketched a simple plan with the recessed entry, the main roof full gable each end, edited the front wall with a break same distance away from R porch railing wall as building depth, did the inviz wall across the recess, made the appropriate roof directives for full gable on the endwalls and the fronts, then autoroofed. See the pics. Your 3rd bay garage bump likely needs a 3-pitch roof or thereabouts. You can use those images you have of the target plan, bringing them into Chief as images or .pdfs or whatever you have, and use CAD to measure all the pitches.

The drawn plans. Did you do whatever needed to be able to trace the walls into your Chief X15 plan? I'm just presuming X15. If you are using Home Designer, go to their forum. If Chief Premiere, go to your account settings and open the Signature page and compose a sig sort of like mine, that tells us what Chief package you run, what you run it on, and maybe whatever other software you use for architecture and 3D work. With all walls in place and room definitions all set for room height, and roof settings done in Defaults the way you want them, then roof directives set for all exterior walls, your auto roof should do most everything except the way the large front gable, in which is nested the entry porch gable, is modeled. That will be a quick manual edit. Post the plan by first copying with plan name POST TO CHIEFTALK, stripping the new file of all interior goodies like cabinets, furniture, fixtures, etc. You want structure only. Then close it, zip it, and post it here. One of the roof pros might even show you the way with a video.

Thanks, Mark! While you were doing that, I fiddled with where the wall break is from curb height to that half height, and moving it a little away from the corner did it too!

Here is my file, 85 megs, shared from MS OneDrive. Doering.plan

Thanks. Try putting a door corner to corner and report, @MarkMc

I am doing this shower using X15 out of box glass shower pony wall. Edited the curb part to have concrete core at 4.5 inch width. Edited the cap to be 5.75 inch wide. I got this unresolved cap corner at the OOB wall and cap specs, and it's here still in the edited version. I have done the wall join edit thing to no avail.

Try locking layers before you start editing.

Big OOPS! Found it where it's always been, in Defaults, cabinet type base, wall, full. But how do I show shelves in dashed lines inside the cabinets, in this elevation view?

What's going on here? Why no indicators?

Very clever, Brett @tundra_dweller, I had not thought of that. I then thought, but I gotta turn off the windows layer to remove the offending glazing lines and jamb boxes, which I did to get the look that @EmmaCox wants, but of course that drops out any window label with it. But then again, Emma's desired plan-view look has no window labeling, so your solution works, once you change the default line to solid for the opening header lines from the OOB dashed lines. Just one more baby step from Chief, and we can get the look for the doors Emma is after! Needs a suggestion.

I don't see a way to do that. You can show windows with the exterior casings on or off, with the interior casings on or off, but you get the Chief-hard-coded double "glazing" lines you want to see represented differently. If you turn off the windows layer, you get a blank space in the wall wherever there is a window. I think what you want merits a clearly written feature request in the Suggestions part of the forum, and you might want it patterned like the way the WALLS - MAIN LAYER ONLY thing works. In fact one might want that windows-shown-as-a-simple-box feature to enable and display always when you select the WALLS - MAIN LAYER ONLY layer to be on. My way might be for that new display thing to work might be that it would yield the look exactly as you show, that being windows as blank boxes same thickness as mail layer walls, and (here is the extension of that) doors to display not as boxes with thickness but as fat-single lines, opened at 90 degrees, and showing the swing arcs. What you show in your post above, is pretty much the standard look for floor plans at every online plans-for-sale site. OK, and now do the roof lines in plan view like what you displayed. Edges of any roof planes that bear on the walls of the floor shown, should be shown in the plan view. That would be a separate Suggestion request. I believe it's already been requested (maybe this one about windows, too) but it never hurts to request it again.

Just watched one of @Renerabbitt's excellent YouTube videos, the one about numbering cabinets in install sequence to help with delivery and installation, and he shows towards the end how he has his fillers, a cabinet-category item type, in a separate schedule. He does not show how this separate schedule gets generated, and I'd like to know. In my example I want to schedule all bathroom cabinetry separately from kitchen. So, how does one do this?

Pic of glass wall quickly done doodled with material regions to mock up mullions. You can see the extents of the wall. The OP might better had described his situation as a framed curtain wall, in which case the solution is done better with windows and mullions. The way he described it made me think of some super modernistic thing done with huge panels of sheet glass. Like some 100 million dollar folly built on a seafront lot way out past East Hampton.

Draw the glass wall with the wall tool, using the OOB X15 wall type "glass wall." Use material regions not cutting finish to apply all the muntins and mullions you want. Show us how it looks when done.