dshall

Really good stuff Joe, but I cannot resize them.... well, I can resize if I unblock but then I lose the HOLE RESIZE. Also, in plan view it appears the plan view cad block is about 1/2" from wall. Yeah, so why does it have to be blocked? Is that something that we cannot avoid. You know, you have done a pretty darn good job of putting it together, it just seems that CA can put it together so that it is easily resizable and the framing auto adjusts.

This is the best solution if I understand what he wants. I did a vid on this somewhere. Bottom line, create a roof that will define top of wall, then move top of wall up 12" in elevation and then back down 12" in elevation. Once this is done, the top of wall stays put irregardless if there is a roof to control the height. Now delete the "ROOF THAT IS ONLY THERE TO DEFINE TOP OF WALL", and since you had changed the top of wall to a taller height and then back down to where you actually want it, the top of wall will remain where you want it even though you have now deleted the roof that controls the height of the top of wall. Confusing? Yes. Is it anymore confusing than trying to figure out what your kids are thinking? No.

Ain't that a pistol. I too am always looking for a better program.... or should I say I am always interested in comparing programs....... Yep, CA holds up pretty darn good even when comparing against the more expensive programs. We must give CA a lot of credit for what they have accomplished.

I think the above statement is going to fix what is not perfect with the symbols as of now. 1. the w/d/ hook up isn't perfect. It seems as if the "HOLE" is not in alinement with the frame of the niche. 2. the hole symbols do not auto locate in plan. I must select the niche and slide into wall. Extra editing not good 3. In vector view, the hole is solid, perfect in render, not so in vector. You said we could get rid of the material in vector with the cost of not being able to select the hole. Seems like a pretty darn good trade off. 4. Would be better if once place, if the symbol itself was a solid fill to hide the "pocheing" of the wall. Really good stuff Joe, best solutions to date by far.

Working with a buddy. He is on PC. Look at pic, why is some text so small and how does he fix? thanks

So funny, you have spent a lot of time trying to figure this out and now you want us to spend a lot of time trying to figure out what we can't see. Why don't you post the plan. Why do we always have to ask for this.

I agree with Perry. I would bet it is user error. It may be confusing, but I can get through it and if you know what you are doing, you can get through it..... with all due respect.

That my friend is clever. You get the overhang at edge of deck

No, but what I have is an achy body after 2 days of snow boarding. And I have another day to go. I don't ever remember being this sore after boarding. And now back to our regularly scheduled program.

Bill just gave you the best advice. Why? Because posting a question on this site ilicits multiple answers, and one is usually the best one for your situation. See the "NICHE" threads.

That is probably an option in prefs you have not set.

I think you will find that if stud layer is on, you see studs, if you turn stud layer off, you will get the ply shthg look.

Really great stuff Joe, thanks.

Joe, how about a quick vid. I am confused.

So funny, I looked for that at 2:45 this morning and did not see it. Maybe I was still asleep. Leaving now for 3 days of skiing with number 1 son.

Joe, what am I missing? How do I make the hole? How do I make a hole in a material region?

Please post a pic, I think you are missing the point that we want a niche. I think you will find your method leaves drywall in place that will HIDE the niche.

NIc, you just have to post pics and plans to get good answers.

Nice job Rob. However I wonder if you could use moldings for the rope tiles and areas if there was a field of tile. If there were special tiles I do understand why you would need a single PSOLID for each tile. I can understand how valuable what you are doing to avoid any confusion between owner and contractor. Thanks for sharing.

Nice job Rob, thanks.

Todd, if you watch this vid, and give all of your framing members a different color, I will see if I can help out here. I tried to do it but I don't have the time to get the framing members colored. Coloring all framing members is very helpful in understanding what is going on.

CA has finally figured it out, use same tool for many different purposes but give it a unique name and it is no longer a work around. Brilliant. BTW Graham, nice catch, and some nice input coming from you, thanks.

Hello, anybody there, isn't there already a thread discussing this? https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/index.php?/topic/4038-glass-shower-walls/ Is there a perfect solution yet? I don't think so.

Well, that goes without saying. What I do think is important is to explain why one thinks a particular approach is better than another. To say, "I like my approach better" is useless dribble. There are a many ways to accomplish a task, but for pete's sake, let's talk about advantages and disadvantages of each approach. And as far as the competitive nature goes, are you kidding? Getting rid of the competitive nature is what it is all about, it is the competitive nature that drives us to come up with better solutions. Let's check our feelings and our egos at the door and teach each other and learn from each other so we as a group will become more successful in our businesses. Eliminate the competitive nature? Let's just hand out a bunch of first place trophies.

Nope, in fact I do not remember my last crash.