Alaskan_Son

He's referring to the "tread" on that short section of ramp forming what is essentially a wall cap. Me thinks it has something to do with being in the vicinity of the other landing and stairs because you cut and paste those 2 sections of ramp into a blank plan and they work just fine...the "treads"/wall caps match and align.

Okay, I figured it out. You're talking about when you drag that flat section of ramp back so that the leading edge is aligned with the leading edge of your landing (right at the apex). Sorry, I don't have an answer for you at this time. I'm really not even sure which stairs and landing it's referring to, are you? It actually happens even if you drag that little flat ramp way off to the side.

I understood that part. I was trying to get clarification on question #2 regarding your issue with "aligning" the 2 segments.

What do you mean by "align" Johnny? I noticed that top ramp is slightly overlapping your landing (by a hair of a hair). Maybe that was causing your problem?

CAD lines

Draw what?

I would have to respectfully disagree (especially for the subject at hand). To each his own, but I find opening indicators on bifold doors to be potentially very confusing and misleading unless you know exactly whats going on (i.e. you still need the side elevation or plan view representation to clarify anyway).

I think I would probably leave the opening indicators off and draw a side detail showing how the doors open. Something roughly like this (maybe with the hinges drawn in as well)... You could draw that door open to any point you want and could add an angular dimension and/or CAD line(s) showing your desired maximum opening angle/dimension/plane. Either that or simply note the desired door hardware and limitations in the cabinet notes or on the front elevation detail. I guess it would partially depend on how you normally draw up your cabinet plans and who you are drawing them for.

I went ahead and submitted this to tech support. I really encourage all of us to submit this type of stuff when we run into it or else we have no reason to complain when it doesn't get fixed. Here's what I submitted... "I have attached a plan drawn up by another Chief user. In it there are a group of various objects in the center of the room forming a fireplace detail. The goal was to rotate the objects as a group. The only way I know of to rotate a group of unlike objects like that is using Edit Area. No problem right? Wrong. Using Edit Area there are 2 problems that arise. 1. (and I have already submitted this issue to you guys) is that we currently have a problem rotating polyline solids that were created in an elevation view and then blocked. If you try to rotate the group of items in the attached plan you'll see that there are 2 architectural blocks that remain unchanged. Those blocks can be exploded and rotated but not rotated as a block. 2. You'll see that if you try to rotate that entire group of objects beyond 90 degrees that all polyline solids in the group will be displaced way outside the room. If you only rotate 90 degrees or less at a time there is no problem. Only seems to be an issue with polyline solids though."

After further investigation I totally agree which is why I recanted in Post #14. I was going to just delete my previous posts to avoid causing confusion but the damage had already been done and people had already commented on them so I just left them.

Good tip Mickey. Admittedly I haven't actually had to draw up the conditions brought up in this thread very much but the issue has come up a couple times recently and so I've spent a fair amount of time experimenting with the various techniques and here are my conclusions... -The slab footing tool is the wrong tool for the job. It was actually designed for a different purpose entirely and so it has certain characteristics and behaviors than can cause problems. I think the name of the tool coupled with the icon are misleading and cause a lot of people to misunderstand what it's for (myself included until I researched it a little more). It's a Slab Footing as in a footing FOR a slab. It's NOT a Slab Footing as in a slab that IS a footing. The icon showing an invisible wall just adds to the confusion. Bottom line though, I think the following 2 methods are far better for the task at hand... 1. As I said before, use a wall definition set up so that it accurately represents what you will be building on that footing (whatever that may be) and just set that wall as a foundation wall and give it a footing. 2. More specifically aimed at the subject of this discussion...simply use a standard foundation wall but set it as invisible. Put it on a unique layer (if you want) and assign the blank line style to that layer. This method is dang near perfect IMO. Easy to control, you can break and resize the footing as desired, displays flawlessly in all views (including the fact that the footer will tie into other footers without any extraneous lines) and can still be selected and resized without having to see the "wall" atop the footing.

I know this is an old topic but I just happened to stumble across it and thought it could use a little clarification... Temporary dimensions get their settings from whichever annotation set/dimension default is active when you are using them. So, Bryce is correct that those settings are located in your dimension defaults. It would need to be changed for whichever dimension default is being used in the anno set you are using though.

Totally agree. We've suggested it many times. Here's just one of those suggestion threads. Maybe add your comments in there. https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/index.php?/topic/5553-custom-dimension-tool-or-override-option/?hl=dimensions

You're welcome! Simply draw a polyline that is the shape you want it and then click Add To Library. Easy peasy. You can even start with existing molding profiles. Just right click on the desired molding in the library and select Place Molding Profile.

No problemo. Re: giving stars. I know you probably just said that in fun, but you can actually give people "Reputation Points" when you find their posts helpful. Just click the little UP arrow in the lower right corner of the post. If you find the post extremely UNhelpful you can click the DOWN arrow.

Yes there is. Go to the floor you want to affect and then go to Edit>Default Settings>Floor and change it there. And BTW, thank you for posting the plan without being asked. You get a gold star (and a point) for that.

You're welcome. Thank YOU for posting the plan. P.S. You should click Mark As Answered on the post that actually answered your question. It just helps other users who may have a similar problem to find the answer quicker.

Howdy again sir... Picture didn't get uploaded. Make sure to click "Attach This File" (easy to miss). Also, you should probably post these questions over in the General Q&A section. Not only is it the proper place but you'll likely get a little more attention there as well.

I would do that using a custom lintel. Here's a quick sample plan so you can explore how I might achieve something like that... Door example.plan

That issue is being caused by your double wall. The program is trying to build a floor structure at a different height under those double walls. There are a couple possible solutions that come to mind depending on your end goal... 1. Select those interior walls and set them as Furred Walls. 2. Drag one of those interior walls away from the exterior wall, select the "room" that is created, check Default for the Floor Structure, and then drag it back. There may be other solutions but hopefully that helps.

Ahh...now an ORTHOGRAPHIC camera view is a different story. I don't believe that works any differently than it ever has. What are you experiencing that is different than it used to be?

Plan?

You can find them in the Core Catalog under Millwork>Gable Brackets

I was able to reproduce your issue by rotating 180 degrees in a single action. Doesn't seem to be a problem if you stop at 90 degrees then continue. Past 90 seems to be the killer. Looks like a bug to me and I think you should report it. The issue rotating architectural blocks containing polyline solids that were produced in an elevation view is also a bug I believe and I have already reported it.

Johnny, I apologize, I didn't actually watch your video before responding. It looks like you tried Edit Area already. Not sure what you did differently than me, but for me it works just fine.