kellytengdahl

Disappearing Foundations

Recommended Posts

Hello I have been having a bit of a problem with a plan I'm doing.

I'm trying to do my elevations but the foundation will appear perfect for about 3 seconds and then disappear. I have attached the file I have been working on and just cannot figure it out. I've tried rebuilding walls, layer displays, etc.

 

can someone please help? I'm about to lose my mind :wacko:

 

X6, PC Windows 7

 

Maddison.plan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I opened your file in X7 and I did not experience what you did. it stays put in all camera views.

 

DJP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could it be that you are placing your camera outside of the terrain.

When you do the camera view, the terrain may take the 3 seconds to rebuild, but then the terrain skirt is hiding your foundation.

I can't open your plan because I don't have access to Chief at the moment, so this is just a wild guess.

Try placing the camera inside the terrain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kelly

"Please do not loose your mind - Chief Architect is not worth that pain."

Had a look at the plan - see no problems  with the elevations

However - you seem to be using Chief Architect without a layout - using it a little like a 2D Auto cad old system.

Could you please specify in a little more detail and see if I can help - I notice your are in Queensland - you can call if you require more help.

Cheers - Michael

Manias Associates

Building Designers

(03)9347-7347

0417 567 123

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree w/ Joey, might be the video card. try to update or at least let us know what video card you use, makes a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

Thanks for the replies.

 

I don't think its video card as I am currently doing all of our 25 standard plans and this is the only one that has caused me this grief all of my others work perfectly fine in x6 & x7, I'll check for updates to be sure.

 

I'll have a look to see if it works in x7 I didn't check this plan.

 

As for layouts yes I'm using them, I'm putting my 25 plans onto the one layout book to print them all at once for our sales people.

The reference to Autocad you may be talking about is I'm converting all the plans from "AutoCAD" to Chief and you may see my "AutoCAD" layer is turned ON its a massive job 

 

Thanks again guys. I do feel that I may have to redraw this one and see if I caused it to glitch somewhere along the way as its seems to be the only one.... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

Thanks for the replies.

I don't think its video card as I am currently doing all of our 25 standard plans and this is the only one that has caused me this grief all of my others work perfectly fine in x6 & x7, I'll check for updates to be sure.

I'll have a look to see if it works in x7 I didn't check this plan.

As for layouts yes I'm using them, I'm putting my 25 plans onto the one layout book to print them all at once for our sales people.

The reference to Autocad you may be talking about is I'm converting all the plans from "AutoCAD" to Chief and you may see my "AutoCAD" layer is turned ON its a massive job

Thanks again guys. I do feel that I may have to redraw this one and see if I caused it to glitch somewhere along the way as its seems to be the only one....

I think the reference to AutoCAD was due to the way you're creating your set of working drawings. It appears as if you are doing it all right inside of the plan file rather than using a layout file to create your plan set. If that's what works for you...go for it, but its highly unusual (I for one have never seen anyone else do it that way).

The "standard" procedure is to send your plan and elevation views to layout (which become your working drawings). If you want to combine them all into one set of plans for printing, I personally wouldn't use a layout file to do that, I would just combine multiple layouts into one PDF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the reference to AutoCAD was due to the way you're creating your set of working drawings. It appears as if you are doing it all right inside of the plan file rather than using a layout file to create your plan set. If that's what works for you...go for it, but its highly unusual (I for one have never seen anyone else do it that way).

The "standard" procedure is to send your plan and elevation views to layout (which become your working drawings). If you want to combine them all into one set of plans for printing, I personally wouldn't use a layout file to do that, I would just combine multiple layouts into one PDF.

 

i'm not creating working drawings for each of these jobs i'm creating a plans book (this is for all of our companies plans as a marketing tool) its made up of floor plans and front elevation only for 25 different houses. meaning i can print all 25 houses from 1 layout not from 1 individual file. if that makes sense

 

working drawings are something completely different to what im doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm not creating working drawings for each of these jobs i'm creating a plans book (this is for all of our companies plans as a marketing tool) its made up of floor plans and front elevation only for 25 different houses. meaning i can print all 25 houses from 1 layout not from 1 individual file. if that makes sense

 

working drawings are something completely different to what im doing.

 

No matter...my point was that you are using the plan file itself to create your pages...that is just unusual is all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Member Statistics

    27494
    Total Members
    6254
    Most Online
    theCADStudio
    Newest Member
    theCADStudio
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By Designer100
      Is there a way to add pre Mfg. brick to outside of the foundation above grade that does not affect the porches etc or parts you do not want it?
       
      Newell Cheatheam
      www.newellsdesigns.com
      newell.cheatheam@gmail.com
      x11 
    • By DRyeHD
      I've looked for a thread on this topic but cannot find one.  Typical construction is CMU stem wall on footing and slab.
       
      I would like to show outside edge of foundation block and all thickened slab areas (for bearing walls and posts).  I see the foundation block on floor "0" and the thickened slab (under bearing walls) and post footings on floor "1".  I would like to display all this on one layout and add dimensions for concrete, plumbing, and other under-slab work.
       
      What is the best way to do this without redrawing a separate plan to accommodate these items?
    • By CRHDesign
      Is there a room dialog to prevent this from happening? Ideally I want to make the cantilever a "cantilever" room and have it not generate walls under the cantilever with auto rebuild foundation walls on. Unless there is an easier way? Copying the balcony room settings ends up generating walls like the attached picture, still generating walls under cantilever. Feel like I'm missing something very simple.
    • By Designer100
      I cannot get the floor joists to  build.It originally a regular slab home.  but now it is pier and  beam with concrete  block around preiemerter at 8' o.c. or wha ever engineer specs out.  I cannot the the floor joist to build on first floor, cannot garage to show 4" drop with preimerter  walls and regular lab,garage left wall to close in. Rear deck will not show up in rendering either.
      FFE 61.00, top of cmu  blocks 60.00, existing grade 57.30', top of grade beam 57.33. garagefloor 52.33 8 cmu blocks abovegarage slab.perfer 12" all around outside of garage foundation. 
       
       
      I would appreciate getting the first floor joists to be installed. and the other issues.
      Plan 5661LAF.GARAGE.PIER&BM.zip



    • By JimAlsup
      Hello All,
       
      I'm trying to figure out the best way to do the foundation for an addition to our 1955 home.  The existing home crawl space is minimal.  Perimeter stem wall is 18 inches with 4/6 girders resting on the sill and footings/posts at 4' O.C. .  Flooring is 2x6 T&G floor boards resting on the girders.  Not sure if that meets modern code. 
       
      For the new foundation area I was thinking of using 2x8 joists for the floor framing and matching the existing stem wall.  I cannot use wider joist without raising the floor as I cannot lower the stem wall height due to code requiring 8" min stem top to group level.  The addition needs to span distances beyond the 12' span distance so I need to support them in some way.  Girders with posts seems reasonable, but I'm concerned about the crawl space height.   2x8 joists on 18" 16" O.C is tighter than the existing foundation which has 18+5.5 and widely spaced girders dropping it to 18".  The new foundation with 4x8 joists at 16" on center and girders would drop the bottom the height to 12" under the beams which seems very tight.  I think the code allows for 12", but is it bad practice?  Am I wasting my time worrying about this? 
       
      I have a few ideas on increasing the clearance, but I don't know which would work best and what the cost trade offs are?
       
      1. Move the 4x6 girder to foundation stem wall height and then attach joists with joist hangers rather than resting on top.
      2. Build internal foundation footing/stem walls as needed to close 2x8 spans to 12' or less (leave access openings)
      3. If legal, copy the existing floor structure.  I'm guessing the 4/6 girders and T&G flooring is likely more costly.
      4. Extend the addition's stem wall and interior ground level down 6 inches.  Slope the soil away from the existing foundation 2" a foot. Excavation and concrete costs go up.
       
      Thoughts?
       
      Thank you,,
      Jim