MarkMc

There aren't going to be videos, open the cabinet dbx to see settings. It's a matter of splitting the face, then delete what isn't needed from the vertical layout you want the chamfer on, resize the layout and change to side panel inset. Then open the symbols to look at stretch zones.

Stopped into the office and had found some millwork symbols I had, converted to a door (may already have those but didn't look further) Here is plan with cabinet and two door symbols, left and right. You can go from there. chamfer cabinet.plan

Yes. You have to make a door symbol, search in tips or symbols. Not sure if I did that exact but also look for beaded inset, beaded chamfer to get an idea (not at machine now)

What Tommy said or I usually just make em or hack existing (for parts)

that's odd- mine are fine and I know it did not change them since I never use them as I have my own.

Layersets only control what layers are active/viewed, the do not dimension defaults. Either use NKBA annotations, kitchen and bath plan view, or just the dimension set to NKBA dimension default.

I avoid SU models but when I must I test them in a new plan and if needed run through a mesh reduction program. (bit of voodoo that though) Ram won't help- higher single processor speed, more GPU memory unless you are already up to 8

Yes SU models can be an issue- depends on surface count, some but less on textures. Recently I've noticed from working with plans posted on the forum that have lots of layersets and anno sets (I mean lots) that those are slower than others. PDF inserted into plans also make a difference. Multiple views open, renderings, just plain larger files all have an impact. I also notice that to close and reopen occasionally can help. That said... Laptop versus desktop-the Sager laptop in my signature still holds it's own and I frequently work with- lots of windows open, files with lots of symbols, and multiple files open. I do keep everything as tidy as possible though. The Sager is 8-1/2 lbs. When I travel with it (and I do) I take the power brick. I don't know the weight but eventually invested in a top end backpack for the whole shebang. It has a desktop CPU faster than what you have, my 980m has 8Gb memory (you don't list that but it matters), having two NVMe SSDS in Raid 0 appears to help with undo (benchmark is crazy on that), and the machine has excellent cooling. For heat it also lets me bump the fans to full throttle with a keyboard, something I do often just in case. You can run a freeware program like HW Monitor to keep an eye on temps and component temps-I do when I know I'll be behaving badly. If you're machine doesn't have a way to bump the fan there is software out there for that but it gets tricky what machines they work with. So if you are willing to haul the weight there are laptops that can keep up. I've recently been looking into my next machine. A change in workflow and the thought that I can run the Sager part time on the road for a few years got me to consider desktops. Configuring both hi-end laptops and hi-end desktops with very similar specs I was surprised to see how little the cost difference is. Zip if you include a decent keyboard and monitor (I'll need a new monitor so I can still have 3 and likely get a keyboard) For me the choice starts to be simplicity of heat control and ability to upgrade. The Sager can be upgraded but it turns out it's not all that cost effective or practical. A desktop will be a bit better.

Maybe I had varied room heights on floor, structure was greyed out

Well match properties using Rooms doesn't allow you to change the structure. I marquis select the walls which get most if not all so pretty easy.

True but you can turn the floor into one room by temporarily changing all partition walls no room definition, make your change then make put back room definition.

You had me curious, 50% savings would add a another reason for me to get a desktop over a laptop and be able to do so sooner than I plan. So I tried two versions- both 9700k. A) Digital Storm base config at $1924 -few upgrades made it $2300; identical on Partspicker was $1902-savings $375 or 18% B) more upgrades- GPU, Optane ssd to replace the Samsung 970 Evo Pro, power supply, MOBO, cooling, DS $3800, PP $2900-savings $900 or 25% Almost a grand on the high end system is attractive. Aside from assembling it yourself, you give up (or do yourself) stress test, lifetime tech support, 3 years labor and 1 yr parts, OS installed, and the DS system has both processors overclocked and checked at NC on either version. Looks like it's a balance between hourly rate and cost savings. Pretty sure I could do it but I doubt that I could: unpack,sort everything (does PP send along a diagram for novices), plan it out, assemble it, install the OS, overclock, and check everything in a day. Likely those with experience could. Otherwise I guess if you just enjoy doing it, or want to learn. (or don't have enough regular work :)

I was surprised to find that what I want costs about the same between Digital Storm desktop and an HID laptop. Heat will be better but then I've not had issues with the Sager. Most laptops are coming with a different RTX card than what goes into desktops, there are a few exceptions.

The Dell offers the current GPU but slower RAM, no name SSD, lesser Mobo and only last gen CPU; not really a deal to me. If I were budgeting I'd sooner have newer pipeline and settle for last gen GPU since until software makes use of RTX features. Which is likely after the next generation is out and you'll have a base system that will keep up. I said "considering "

I've been considering moving to a desktop in the next year and had my eye on the mid tower Slade from Digital Storm Can be configured close in price to the Dell or there are more options and generally better components: available 9th gen CPU, faster ram, better MOBO standard, better SSDs ( SSD M.2 (500GB Samsung 970 EVO) (NVM Express) standard, power and cooling options. In the long run you might spend a bit more-if and how much you can decide. Since all those options can be daunting you can either fill out a form to email for advice or call and talk to a human for help with configuration. Worth a look anyway, I mean if you're gonna keep this one for seven years might as well investigate a little :)

Not sure what you have going on without playing with symbol and settlings. Possible you need a left and a right, possibly something else. So play with it

You'll need a different symbol with different origin size and stretch planes

I've used this to with odd newel spacings, tried it two ways. Either may be easier than one post at a time (still a workaround though). In one case-the long run of posts is an open railing, set as post to rail, no top or bottom rail, Structure is baloon through ceiling, and height set to go as far as needed. The balusters in that are a symbol. The second one, which I like better-first make the tall posts as above, convert to symbol, then replace that with the side rail. In both cases the side rails are No Post. What I like about that is it's easier to match the correct height and spacing for the posts to whatever you want. Still a workaround. posts.plan

I was skeptical that catalogs don't update. I had quickly checked in windows explorer for modification dates of libraries which indicated that they did update. I didn't manage to check much further but in the course of answering about the Silestone catalog I found that my X10 library is different than the X11. AND installing a new one in either gave made no change to it. Further, I save all library files on my computer before installing them. The newest Silestone catalog I have was downloaded August of 2016 which means that the X11 catalog updated itself. So I'd be double checking the information with support before redoing all the catalogs (unless like Mick you have renamed them).

Bennie Moore was last updated December 2018, Silestone was updated this past February and that is in X11 catalog it is NOT in my X10 catalog. The X11 file is 30 MB while the X10 is only 12. It may be that the X11 catalog will not install in X10, check with support before purchasing the catalog.

If you are using a Bilco door on it there are some threads with symbols on the forum, one cuts the terrain and has stairs, just add a doorway- real easy. The other way I've done it is with a terrain hole and retaining walls and make stairs. With that one you have to adjust the retaining walls in section.

Thought about it a bit. Floor 1 is always at 0", can't lower or raise the floor. You can however alter a room. So possibly make floor 1 a single room and move that in room DBX, then floor below in floor dbx?

Did not try your plan, not a lot of time so just made a simple 2 story with foundation. Insert new floor 36" high below first floor, went to top floor added 36, second floor added 36, first floor-no ceiling no floor, set floor below to minus 36 and ceiling to 0. Let it settle, then delete that floor. Worked on test.

I tried a couple of things the only thing that works on the existing is adjusting all floors. I'd think adjusting terrain individually is out of the question. TM move did not work for either the building or the terrain. Thought you need to move it a few times to see where? Setting plan default snap distance to a foot or two allows raising and lowering the symbol in elevation quick, drag in or 3D. I'd use the symbol to get and mark site location then move the building in plan-then the fun begins adjusting all the floor heights of each building. First one will you could likely do with defaults, second one could be interesting. Or take the short way out and use the plan with symbols where you need to show terrain and leave the buildings alone? New reference sets may help with that. Edit- if you need good 3D with terrain and building then make a second symbol that has detail-and replace from library

Just tested one making a shell as simple as possible converted to a symbol (exterior fixture). Performance was good-original model I used was not well developed, textures minimal, footprint 1600 s ft, terrain with a few slopes-YMMV.