robdyck

I'm chucklin' but...it seems like a bit of a stretch. Maybe we need to be at that bar!

I feel like there's a super funny double entendre somewhere in there but it's over my head. What'd I say?

I can manually do anything...

I hate to say it, but I think attic walls might have been the least of your troubles...There's too much wrong to even begin a list. I cleaned some of it up and have attached the plan. I highly recommend watching every tutorial video and reading at least most of the manual. 1110_Jackson_St_B.plan

Are your framing specs the same for sliding doors as they are for hinged or bifold doors?

For those of us who like the stairs to be in the actual right position...this requires that the top of the stair does not directly make contact with the platform framing line. There will of course be some type of finish material added to the risers. This usually includes the top riser, and yes, it's thicker than Chief's 'zero' thickness 'riser surface at top landing'. For this exercise we'll say that material is 1/2" thick. And depending on your regional construction methods, there may be some structural material at the top of the stairs. In Alberta, and probably most of Canada, there is a stair 'hanger' which is plywood that extends vertically from the underside of the stringer to the top of the upper nosing. For this exercise we'll say that plywood is 1/2" thick. This means that the stairs need to be set 1" away from the platform framing line. The question is: what invisible wall type would you use that will properly define the platform framing edge and not produce a gap in the floor between the stairs, or a gap in the drywall? A typical 2x4 wall, drywall both sides: A Room Divider, 1/2" thickness: So my solution: An invisible wall, 1" thickness, material drywall. Hopefully someone else finds this useful.

If you don't mind, I'll jump in. If you'd like a new schedule that has the same properties, then select the existing schedule, use the SET AS DEFAULT tool, then delete it, and place a new one. It is a pointless exercise, however as the new one will be the same as the one it replaced.

Awesome! How did you figure that out?

Or send the drawing to layout at that scale. If it's 1:50 it's metric right? Can you settle for 1m = 50m? Here's my layout box labels:

Somebody's paying you to work for them, right? It's their job to get you the necessary info to start or at least provide you with the contact info of whomever has the full lot survey drawings. If this is your first such project, don't forget to check and confirm that you have the most recent land-use-bylaw or zoning requirements!

Good Catch Eric. This also won't be a problem if the window(s) is selected in the schedule using the Open Row Object tool.

So I'm checking with tech support about this, and I'll post the results. But I think I'll be able to 'fix' this by taking one of Chief's templates, and importing all my settings. Essentially building a new plan template. At first, I thought I may be able to import some setting from one of Chief's templates to my own, but this isn't a setting issue...there's something deeper and I think it's because my template has evolved over so many years from older Chief versions. I double checked this by copying an entire model from a 'Chief' plan (where the grain auto shows correctly) and copying it to my default plan. In my default plan the grain all runs based on the material angle setting, even though it's the exact same material! I don't mind making materials where I have to to get the right angle, but if you compare the different pictures closely, you'll see that in a 'Chief' plan, the grain is correct at studs, plates, headers, and truss members, whereas in my plan, they all run either vertical or horizontal, again, depending on the material setting. I'm working on another timber plan now, and it's really handy to be able to draw a rafter and use as a rafter or symbol instead of constantly making solids. Plus the framing looks so much better when it's right!

Did you see where and how you need to add your comments to get them in the schedule?

I agree with Michael, @Hammer7 seems unaware that the Comment field will populate from the Object Information Panel of the Window Specification dialog box.

I don't know...I think we need another cabinet manufacturer library instead. I've only got a choice of about 97 different shaker style cabinet doors. But yes, I'll add to the suggestions.

That's what I was showing in my earlier post. For stairs at a landing, If you open the stair dbx and check the clip top function, it shows them clipped. But when you close the dbx, alas, they do not clip:( And nice of @SNestor to post his video again, but how come (by now) we can't actually tell the stairs to: -clip the top (for real, honestly, just do it if I tell you to) -extend the stringer beyond the bottom nosing a specified distnace -add a molding to the stringer / trim against wall (with edge control) I realize I'm asking pointless questions.

Please post the plan. I'll take a look right away.

Here's an image from Chief's 'Residential Template'. The grain direction is correct, even if I paint the framing with my own framing materials. So the question is, how do I get those settings into my template?

I'm still not over this grain direction thing. Here's an image from a plan that @LevisL posted quite awhile back. Notice that in this plan the grain goes the right direction for all framing members. I think this has to do with the origin of plan templates, but what do I know? In the image below, I replaced the texture file from the default framing material to my own, just to see what happens. In this image from my default template, this is what I get for grain direction. I I really want to figure out how to correct this. The materials in both images have the exact same properties except for the texture file.

Is it based on the build order? That's the only thing I could come up with.

I have a group of 3 separate windows. The middle window is the same size as the others, but is a different type. Why would Chief group these together in my schedule? Is this a bug? Right and Left units are double awnings while the middle unit is 'Fixed Glass'. This seems really odd.

For my Room Schedule, GROUP SIMILAR OBJECTS was unchecked. I checked that and copied the schedule and the ordering was corrected. I certainly wouldn't have thought to try that. Thanks Michael!

Shouldn't a schedule create a logical order automatically? For example, if the first column is "FLOOR" shouldn't they be in order from smallest to largest? If column 2 is "ROOM NAME" shouldn't they be alphabetical? I'm sure they used to be this way... what am I missing? The attached image is of a 'fresh' schedule. It seems pretty random to me.

If this polyline were given a bit more properties, it could be even more useful, no? Spitballing a few ideas: -could it auto-update? -could it have an OIP? -could it have an auto-layer setting (not CAD default)? -could it, and others like it (from other floors) be included in a schedule?

I found this laying around in my library...forgot I had it there! Frost Free Hose Bibb.calibz