dshall

Okay, did a Skype with The Great Glenn Woodward, do you think we solved it? Heck yeah!!! With Perry's Bucked Wall, we need an extra stucco layer so I can control where the platform is built to. I will do a vid sometime soon on Perry's Bucked Wall Solution. Again, the least poisonous solution.

Hey guys, back to the BUCKED WALL. I thought Perry's solution was the best of all the evil solutions. However, if I stray a little past down and dirty, problems pop up. Take a look at this plan and see if you can fix the problem. It seems that windows stacked on two different floors cause problems. PERRY BUCKING PLAN STOCK 2.plan

Whilst a great solution, I think Perry's solution might work better for my project. Thanks do much Graham for the interest. When we all work together, we make a great team.

Dennis, you and I are seeing the same thing. We hope they are working on stairs for X8.

I opened your plan, did full overview, I surface deleted the treads and I did not see a stringer. I reopened your plan did full overview and opened stair dvx and selected NO RISER, I now had stringers, inconsistent behavior.

Weird stuff, go to STYLE<CLOSED STRINGER, different looking stringers on each side, to to STYLE<SINGLE STRINGER and all is well. I played with it a little more and I think I got what you wanted.

Joe, that is a valid argument, but that is not what my contractor is doing. Every couple of weeks he writes me a check so I have decided to do what he wants me to do.

Joe, what you are missing is the stucco return between the buck and the blue window frame , see the dark brown stucco, that is what you are missing.

Joe, I must of been looking at the wrong plan because nothing in your plan comes close to what I am trying to do. See pics.... no buck at framing and no stucco buck...

Perry's solution is not perfect, but it is the least poisonous poison.

I don't understand. I thought I was clear on what I was trying to achieve. Perry did it. Does your solution solve the problem? Joe, I look at your solution and I am trying to figure out what you did. Are you showing a way that does not work?

Yusuf, do you think your solution is better than Perry's solution? I do not think so.

Great question. Ask yourself this, would you as the designer want to know sooner or later...... I say sooner..... so yes.... I think you should say something...... if you are dealing with an appreciative architect, he will thank you. In this business, I think it is wonderful when one trade looks out for another trades back. The key is letting him know about the issue without coming across as a know it all.

No, it was a question for Glenn.

With this solution, P. should get bonus points.

P. I do not know what to say but thank you very much. A wonderful simple solution....... thank you thank you. The one issue I was imagining was the ref layer of sill plates at slab foundation level. Not a big deal. A great solution that can be retro actively implemented.

Holy effing kamoly, and the P Man is the new winner. Very very nice P. thanks. I might have to practice, but I think you have it... I think....... there might be a obscure minor problem that I will look into..... but this might be the cleanest solution to date....... really really nice......

Larry, my AS BUILT is saved as the PROPOSED PLAN. I do all that stuff up front before I get into proposed plan. How can you design an addition without a SITE PLAN that shows setbacks, FAR, coverage etc. What about building heights, don't you have to take height into consideration when you design an addition, hence a roof plan and elevations. Working on a house right now which is essentially what I described. I did the as built, saved as proposed. I am taking out two walls to open up kitchen and gutting and replacing kitchen cabs. No new floor area. My engineer need roof framing, floor framing, foundation and 2 sections to do his engineering. He needs elevations and roof plan so he can see the pitch to decide whether the live load is 16 PSF or 20 PSF. I am not sure how I could do much less work to satisfy the plan checker's needs, my engineer's needs and the title-24 needs. If you can get by without doing all of this, more power to you.

I thought so too until I saw The Dennis Gavin method. I would use the double wall method if it was only one window. But it is every window and door on every wall on about 12 different houses and I thought the double wall system would be too much trouble. I always draw with the notion that whatever I draw will need to be edited. And then there is the thought that none of my building sections would be correct, they would show the double walls and plates. I suppose I thought this was the best of the evils. I think I have chosen my poison.

Andy, Jon, Greg, Marc, Larry, how long does it take you to do as built? Use this house as an example: A typical 2200 sf 2 story Kalifornia stucco house on a slab, flat lot, vaulted ceilings in the living room and a switch back stair, two car garage. When I say as built I am talking SITE PLAN, ROOF PLAN, ELEVATIONS, FLOOR PLANS, ROOF FRAMING, FLOOR FRAMING, FOUNDATION AND 6 SECTIONS. No electrical plan and no cabinet elevations.

I concur.

Did a friend of mine come to the party but left early ?

That's great Joey, thanks for reminding us of what was posted in post number 1 including the plan.

Gee whiz Joe, I thought Dennis's solution was much easier and more editable than creating symbols and then having to put another window off to the side and when the client changes the window size having to go about the process all over again. Wow, thanks for setting me straight. And yes I think CA should waste time creating the option to draw construction lines and as usual, your solution was much more trouble than being able to create construction lines.

The bucking vid. http://youtu.be/Mo74FCr93_8