dshall

This is such a great question. The SHAPE option in the window DBX is severely limited. I can build the window you want, but it is upside down, Check out the pic, I built your window but as I said it is upside down.

Glenn is the best..... give him a jingle....

No, the assessors plat is unreadable, the original plot was 50x105, it is a corner lot where they closed a portion of one street and the ROW was 60’ AFTER the closure, some of the closure went to lot which increased the size but it was an easement with a subeasement in there and in 1961 some added a detached garage in ROW an d 3’ from curb with a pending remove garage out of ROW order and it is Thursday today.... so the answer is no, I would like a survey or at least a civil engineer to interpret the written Minho jumbo that describes said lot. it is La Jolla, we can afford to do it right.

The lot dimensions as drawn are very suspect . We are getting site surveyed. I am curious as to how accurate it is. If this site matches surveyed site I will be very impressed.

I have not tried it. they do it without a site visit. My client got this and there was even floor plans of both floors. Not sure how that was obtained,

This is interesting, anybody seen this? https://getasiteplan.com/contact/.

BTW, I think this is the "buck wall" method that I was looking for several years ago. However, I guess the "buck" width is limited to 3.5" in this example. But with this method I must use 2 walls and 2 set of top plates. IOW, I can't do this in a 2x12 wall.

BTW, look at this plan. Look at the two pics. The only difference is : the pic where the stone returns, the casing is 3.5" the pic where the stone DOES NOT RETURN, the casing is 4". hmmmmmm 925915640_DoubleWall fix?.plan

does this help?

Absolutely,

The easy fix is to lock a good truss and multiple copy. An easy fix for this plan.

why does this post keep disappearing?

Hi Glenn, this is a different plan.

Hey guys, here is the plan. BBBB plan with bad trusses 2.plan

I don't think the roof could be any simpler

I forgot to record, sorry

Hey Guys and Gals, I just sent out invites, if you didn't get one, let me know at dscotthall@macDOTcom

I was surprised they let me give you 3 down votes. See you. later today.

A reminder...... Hi All, A friend emailed me and said, "it's been a long time, let's have a workshop and get educamated" , so I said okay. If you are interested please please please please please send me an email. dscotthall@macDOTcom please do not RSVP in this thread, just an email It will be this Friday. 8/14/2020 at 2:00 pst. Topic is up in the air. I think my friend was inspired by the SPV discussion. Whatever, something new always pops up. Everybody is welcome. By the way, it will be a GOTOMEETING hosted by me unless my friend insists on hosting it using ZOOM. He and I will fight over the honor.

I see it just the other way around. The more value the more there is to discuss and explain.

Hi All, A friend emailed me and said, "it's been a long time, let's have a workshop and get educamated" , so I said okay. If you are interested please please please please please send me an email. dscotthall@macDOTcom please do not RSVP in this thread, just an email It will be this Friday. 8/14/2020 at 2:00 pst. Topic is up in the air. I think my friend was inspired by the SPV discussion. Whatever, something new always pops up. Everybody is welcome. By the way, it will be a GOTOMEETING hosted by me unless my friend insists on hosting it using ZOOM. He and I will fight over the honor.

I can't think of an example to dispute your statement that a FRAMING LAYER SET might work for different levels, or a FLOOR PLAN LAYER SET may work for different levels. I have unique LAYER SETS for each level because it hurts my head thinking about the exceptions. I also have unique ref sets for each PVS for the same reason.

Well....... if Steve Nestor doesn't do a vid, I will volunteer. Steve, let me know if you want to do it.... or if somebody else will do it...... ...... this is my final warning, if you guys won't do it, I will.

yes.

try this.