Joe_Carrick

You definitely need a custom field to use in the schedule since the "Code" column is hard coded to use the value in that OIP field. With a custom field, you can put macros in that will display what you want for the SKEW in the schedule. If you don't want to create a custom field then use the Comment field to put your macro(s) in and rename that column in the schedule.

Note that you can then use the Shelf Label to display the color by typing %component_code% in the Label. Another options would be to use a custom field SKEW_Code and enter the "J1", "D1", "G3" etc directly thus eliminating the need to convert from colors to codes.

Lance, Put your color code in the OIP for the shelf. That's what owner.component_code uses to get the "color". This is completely independent of any actual color in the shelf since there's no attribute for the color names. You could even create a custom field "color_code" which could be used instead of the "component_code" but that's only if you want. IAE, the actual object color would be irrelevant except for graphic representation.

Yes, that works. Just set that layer to not display in the plan views where you don't want to show it. There is also a setting in the Camera dbx for "Display on All Floors" which can be useful.

I am now using Wall Material Regions (3/4" thick, 2" wide, full height) and multi-copy at the desired spacing. This skips all openings and I use the exterior Room Polyline to create the horizontal bands as needed. It's full 3D with proper shadows and very easy to edit. ps: Window and Door Trim + Corner Boards provide the rest of the job.

Please add some "Shower Towers" to the Bonus Library and/or the Manufacturer Libraries. There are several examples which can be found in Houzz. Some of these fixtures are only $200-$400 and are pretty easy to install so they make a super upgrade to showers from the standard mixing valve and shower head.

No, it will show all the finishes but not which walls the finishes are on.

Hi Glenn, I didn't see it in the wall dbx before, but it's still messed up in terms of how the schedule displays it. There really needs to be a separate set of columns for each wall of a room. In addition, the Wall Material Region doesn't appear in the schedule at all.

This is so messed up it isn't funny. In the Room FinishSchedule: Wall Material and Wall Finish Material are the same. These are taken from the Wall Type definition. Schedule columns are ridiculous. Wall Coverings are listed separately but they are applied to all the wall surfaces in the room and only as horizontal bands. Separating them on different walls isn't possible. Wall Material Regions can be assigned to individual walls or even parts of walls - great flexibility but they don't appear in the Schedule.

I have a lot of wall types that I use. Just for 2x4 Interior Walls I have: 1/2" Drywall Chase (drywall on one side only) 5/8" Drywall Chase (drywall on one side only) 1/2" Drywall (drywall on both sides) 5/8" Drywall (drywall on both sides) etc Then, I have to decide if I want the "finish" to be a part of the wall type definition or to use the "wall covering" to specify paint, wall paper, tile, etc. It can get a bit complicated. Naturally, for Exterior Walls there are a lot more just because of the exterior materials. In some cases I think it's easier to do a double wall (Exterior Wall plus Interior Furred Wall) depending on the construction, especially when concrete or masonry walls are involved. The alternative to this is a lot of composite wall types. Do you break down your wall types in a similar manner? I've noticed on a lot of plans posted on the forum that there's almost no differentiation between walls in plan view. That would mean the Materials List could be off by quite a bit.

If you haven't created trusses and everything is set to auto-rebuild (foundation, roof planes, wall, ceiling and roof framing then all you need to do is move the wall. Everything will be done for you automatically. Once you use trusses it's a different story. Mostly because deleting the roof framing and ceiling framing turns off auto-rebuild. As a result you need to use edit all roof planes and rebuild the framing, etc. -Joe

Oh what the heck. Scott should be held responsible for everything. Why not?

The contractor should have checked what he was ordering matched the permitted plans. I would say he now has some extra trusses to use on another job

Right Click - Select your symbol in the Library Open the Symbol dbx (the little chair) Check the settings there You can also change them there so in many cases you don't have to go thru the "Create Symbol" process over and over to get it right.

You might need to save your Plan or Template in X10 before this will work. Some things in an X9 Plan or Template just don't work right in X10. This is not unusual when upgrading the software. As the software evolves, so does the data content in the model and that doesn't happen until you save the file. I keep separate Plans and Templates within separate folders so I can still use a prior version of the software if absolutely necessary - which is rare.

You might be able to eliminate that problem by adjusting the opening framing and clearances. If not then use a PSolid to patch it. Just one of those things that sometimes require manual intervention.

In the last panel, check the "x" stretch plane box. The stretch Plane specs tell Chief where to limit stretching. In this case width stretching will be limited to the center of the symbol height stretching will occur above the bottom frame and below the top frame depth can not be stretched since it would occur outside of the door thickness. Since you didn't check the "x" stretch plane box, the width is stretched uniformly instead of just at the center of width. Note that the origin of symbols in Chief (0,0,0) is (center,back,bottom). Stretch Plane positions are relative to the symbol origin.

You are correct. I've fixed it now

Placing "Stretch Planes" at x = 0 y = 1" z = 6" or whatever the metric equivalents are should do the trick.

I even have the backsplash turned off in the Cabinet Defaults. I just find them to constraining while Custom Backsplashes are totally editable. Wall Material Regions are also a good alternative.

Aldo is my friend only to see what an object is using. I seldom use it to change anything.

It's important to note that if you mess with the Layer Settings it will no longer be in sync with the "Saved Plan View". If you want those Layer Settings to be permanent with that view then "Save the Plan View" If not then just selecting the "Saved Plan View" from the "Project Browser" will revert to the previous. Typically, I have the Annoset select the Layer Set. Opening or switching to the "Saved Plan View" from the "Project Browser" forces those to be reset. Note that if you make any changes to the Layer Set or Defaults while a "Saved Plan View" is active the Tool Bar will indicate "Using Active Defaults". That's the clue that somethings not the same.

The same basic problems exist for "Sliding Barn Doors" in that they are just symbols attached to the wall and not really doors that the Door Tool understands.

I think the problem is that the Door Tool was: originally written to deal with just rectangular slab doors. modified to provide for arches, trim, etc. modified to use door symbols - but assuming the Door Tool would deal with the details. Unfortunately there's nothing in the Symbol itself to tell the Door Tool what to do about thickness, hinging, irregular shapes, casings, frames, hardware, etc. The Door Tool simply doesn't have any way of knowing what the detail should be for a given symbol. As long as the door symbol is designed so that it fits within the settings in the Door dbx it works fine - beyond that it's a mess.

I was kind of excited to see some of the new Door Symbols Libraries. There are some "Bookcase Doors", a "Vault Door" and a few more that looked like they would be useful. Unfortunately when I tried to use them I found they didn't behave very well. In 2D particularly they didn't show the correct thickness and didn't hinge as you would expect/need. I tried using the door dbx to force them to display properly in both 2D and 3D but wasn't satisfied with the results. If I could place the actual symbol in a plan without having to put it in a wall I might be able to make adjustments in the Symbol dbx that would work but there's no guarantee. The problem is essentially that the Door Tool has several built-in limitations and just doesn't allow much variation from a simple 1"-3" thick door with the hinge point located at the outside face of the door. If we are going to be able to use such cool door symbols, the Door Tool will need to be tweaked to deal with them. So far this has been disappointing.