Alaskan_Son

Reshaped wall polyline, ceiling plane, and/or polyline solids. Polyline solids for both the wall and ceiling are easiest but to get the stair railing to display correctly, you’ll probably need to use an actual wall. There are a couple options there though as well...reshape the wall OR put the wall on a unique layer and turn that layer off in camera views. Post the plan though and I just might make you a quick video this morning.

Just a side note for whatever it’s worth, but I personally find that measuring to the CENTER of openings for site measurements is far less problematic. When you measure to casings, not only do you have to make sure you accurately record and set casing size, but you also need to record and set frame/jamb reveals and in some cases, even jamb/frame sizes. Instead of making casings a crucial and integral part of the process, they become a secondary detail as they typically should be since it’s the opening itself that matters the most.

My comment was made very specifically in reference to Temporary Dimensions. How they behave at openings is controlled by your Dimension Defaults.

That's controlled by your Active Dimension Defaults>Locate Objects>Openings settings.

You may want to check out the Image CAD Blocks bonus library.

What does “add as a text” mean? And how does it create a schedule?

You bet. You as well

2 potential solutions... Let Chief handle it automatically... ...or, what I usually do, just customize the cabinet face...

Double click in the Price's Formula field, you should see 3 different buttons. Click on the button on the right and select Apply Formula To Source Object. Now enter your formula in the field... =width*12.25

Or, if you want to keep your subfloor, just turn off the Rooms layer in your cross section.

Sorry, I just realized that I sent you a deceptive screenshot in my last post. The basics are the same, but you need to open up the Change Floor/Reference dialog while in a camera view. Again though, just to stress one MAJOR point, each and every element must be positioned appropriately in their respective plans. The 3D reference display basically behaves like Paste Hold Position and the various elements cannot be relocated. They are where they are.

Even .01" will fix it.

It's because your floor finish layers are set to 0" thick. With no finish layer thickness, the floors are defaulting to the 1st Floor Floor Finish Defaults.

Either you don’t quite realize what Xrefs are capable of or you aren’t understanding the limitations we have in Chief. Using your subdivision as an example: In AutoCAD you can model the buildings as usual in separate files and then insert them into your master plan as Xrefs. Upon insertion, you can adjust the insertion point, rotation, and even scale of each individual house. In Chief on the other hand, this is not possible. Individual houses would have to be modeled at off angles, at the exact size you want them, and at the exact height and X/Y location in their respective plans as where you will eventually place them in your master plan. This is a MAJOR limitation if you’re using for something like subdivision planning since you obviously would want the ability to move those various elements around, and possibly even adjust scale during massing studies.

Reference Display... ...just bear in mind that any referenced plan files cannot be re-positioned in relation to each other. They are always fixed in relation to the origin.

A few tips: Think of a symbol as a collection of triangular 3D faces. This geometry is fixed and will always be tied to that particular symbol. Any changes made in the 3D or Sizing tab of the Symbol Specification dialog will not actually affect that original geometry, rather they will affect how that originally geometry will be displayed and how it will be treated when resized. Think of the bounding box as the dimensions at which you want the aforementioned geometry displayed at full size. Any changes to the size of the symbol will affect the displayed geometry proportionately. If you want to accurately adjust the sizing of your symbol's 3D geometry then you need to modify the original geometry. With all the above in mind, it's typically best to wait till you have your desired geometry sized correctly and create a brand new symbol before messing with the bounding box. Creating a new symbol will ensure that the symbol is using your desired geometry and not just a modified version of the original geometry. If a symbol's bounding box has already been messed with it can really mess you up. To reset it to it's original state, Open Symbol>3D and then click Rotate + followed immediately by Rotate -. This will return the bounding box to the size of the original geometry. Once you get your symbol sized to your liking, select it, click Convert Selected To Symbol, and then take that NEW symbol and adjust its bounding box.

I find it interesting that some of you who find the point system utterly useless are amongst the first to get in a tizzy when they get some down votes and you also commonly seem to feel the need to hand out a few up votes for no other reason than to help even the scales, for what? To make sure everyone gets a trophy? You either care or you don’t. If you really and truly find them useless, just ignore them and don’t click on them.

This has been discussed a ton in the past, but I personally think they serve a crucial purpose that cannot otherwise be accomplished in a heavy traffic online forum. They are really the only real form of positive/negative consequence, and more importantly they’re really the only way of effectually providing a measurable peer review and serve as a virtual replacement to the real world “reputation”. There are thousands of users who frequent the forum but never post and I’d venture to say that there are thousands more who only ever stop by 2 or 3 times. In all cases, but especially in the case of the occasional user, there is no other metric in place that gives them any clue as to whether or not any given user knows what they’re talking about. I see conflicting information every single day and in every other thread. The Reputation Point system gives us at least some way of weeding through it in an environment where there’s otherwise no real way to tell the difference between someone who just likes to talk and someone who actually knows what they’re talking about.

I think it's best to understand what Active Defaults are first and foremost. Once you get that, think about it like this... Default Sets are an optional way to save a pre-configured group of Active Defaults. Change your Default Set and all your Active Defaults change to that saved configuration. A Saved Plan View on the other hand will remember the state of your Active Defaults regardless of whether those Active Defaults are saved as a Default Set or not. But the Saved Plan View also remembers a whole lot more. Here's a snapshot of your Active Defaults (items that can be saved as a Default Set)... ...and that list expanded to show what is saved with the Saved Plan View...

This only happens when the resulting available space for your header is less than the header you have specified. To get the desired header, either reduce the Header Depth, lower the top of the door, or reduce the Rough Opening Top and/or Bottom settings.

When you can't get the Trim/Extend tools to work, try the Join & Lap/Miter tools instead.

Still works just as well as ever. It only applies to plant images though.

I think it should have been =count*0.1, but it barely even matters in my opinion. Whether you feel there was an error in the video or not, the video still served its purpose. She showed the basics of how to use formulas. Whether she entered the correct values is debatably irrelevant because she showed how to use the tools. A person could for example relabel the Extra column “Including Waste” and simply use =extra*price in the Total Price column and the formula she used would be entirely appropriate.

I watched the snipet in the video and tend to agree that it probably wasn’t correct. She essentially put 110% in the Extra Column. Using the Default Formula in the Total Cost column ((count+extra)*price if I remember correctly), the price would be grossly inflated.