Rich_Winsor

Funny (odd, not funny ha ha) that after all these years of Microsoft selling us their operating system and including the games for free, now they want to give us the operating system for free and charge us for the games. Well I'll be dad gummed if I'm going to log on as a guest on my own computer just to play some watered down game version fraught with advertising. Fortunately in this day and age there seems to be a hack for everything and this little program will restore your classic Windows 7 games on your Windows 8 or 10 rig. http://winaero.com/blog/get-windows-7-games-for-windows-10/ Just scroll down and follow the 3 steps outlined. I downloaded and unzipped the files on a flash drive and ran the setup program from there without any problems. An interesting side note: Apparently Windows 10 doesn't completely remove the games when it upgrades a Windows 7 system because when I opened the newly accessed games in Windows 10 my results history for the games was still there intact.

I like the Chief version better. That floor is awesome.

https://3dlibrary.chiefarchitect.com/index.php?r=site/detail/922

Ray, check out this link. You can create an installation DVD and install Win 10 from that when you are ready. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10

One of the annoying side effects of using Chief is that I am always looking at building techniques and wondering how I would accomplish modeling them with Chief. Here is a sketch I dashed off of a building I saw while watching TV. I was intrigued by the way the lower part of the second story wall kicks out and provides an overhang to support the gutter which in turn merges seamlessly with the gutter of the Gable roof. It was no mean feat to get all the disparate elements including roof pitches, fascia heights and shingle texture scale and location to match up and form the shingled second story wall with a continuous gutter. The whole time I was modeling my sketch I was wrestling with the question: Are these second floor dormers or is this just a two story rectangular box with a Gable roof straddling the top? (I modeled it as the latter)

Kool stuff guys. Joe, if I may ask, how do you handle roof runoff on those structures? It seems to me that there would be a virtual torrent cascading down onto those nice flower beds.

Wow! I am such a lightweight. 4 days and 500 passes? How hot was the laptop after that stint? Maybe it's my short attention span but I never let them run anywhere near that long. With Ray Traces it seems that I am constantly fighting the laws of diminishing returns. Can you still discern changes in the image quality after so many passes?

Hey Cristian, It looks like you are trying to achieve a "chrome" effect while in Standard View. I doubt that you will ever get the effect you want there. To get a realistic chrome you need to do a Ray Trace. Some of the qualities you need like Reflection only apply to Ray Traces. Here is a sure fire way to get a good chrome effect. In the Define Material dbx go to the Properties tab and set the Material Class to Shiny Metal. Set the Roughness level to 0. Set the Reflection level to somewhere in the 80 to 100% range. Specular isn't as critical and you can try different values but start around 50%. Now when you run a Ray Trace you will have shiny reflective chrome. By way of an example, here I have changed a marble vase from the Browser Library to chrome.

BUMP! Any information on the workings of the Pattern and Texture settings in the Define Material (rainbow tool) dbx (and how they affect that infernal teapot) would be welcome.

Here are a couple of shots that afford the somewhat unique opportunity to show the same background in two different seasons.

I don't think you are going about it in the proper way. In keeping with the season here is what I would try. In the cauldron boil and bake; Eye of newt and toe of frog, Wool of bat and tongue of dog, Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting, Lizard's leg and owlet's wing, For a charm of powerful trouble, Like a hell-broth boil and bubble. Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn and cauldron bubble. Seriously if the exact name does not return a result how are all the filter options in the world going to make any difference. As the Library continues to grow in size it is obvious that the search engine needs to be revamped. JMHO

It ain't just this forum. That guy seems to have his hands on everything.

Probably stating the obvious here but you can make adjustments in the Image Properties dbx on the fly so to speak and they update in the ongoing ray trace. Also as long as the ray trace window hasn't been closed you can also make adjustments after the ray trace has been stopped. This way you can display 2 ray traces side by side and still make adjustments to either one of them.

Or should I say why is it so hard to get good ray trace results? Well I have been doing a lot of ray tracing lately and I think I can put my finger on it now. Ray Tracing is akin to digital alchemy. You are presented with a palate consisting of an incalculable number of possibilities and you are tasked with finding just the right combination of these possibilities to create that “golden” image. I always assumed that there were lots of possible combinations but when I ran some numbers I was flabbergasted. Take the “Image Properties” dbx which is instrumental to all ray traces. Here we have 7 slider bars which each have 100 different selections that range from 0% to 100%. Now I’m no mathematician but to me that works out to making a selection of 7 settings out of a possible 700. So how many possible combinations are we talking about? 1.5 x 10 to the 16th power - Help me out here, is that 15,000,000,000,000,000 ? Holy sh$t! And you can double that number by simply selecting or deselecting the “Use Tone Mapping” option. These of course are global image settings and don’t even start to consider the possibilities of changes to individual item’s characteristics which depending on their Material Class include such as: Diffuse, Specular, Roughness, Emissive, Transparency, Translucency, Reflection or Index of Refraction. And then all of these possibilities can have different colors. Are we getting the picture yet? That is why Ray Tracing is so hard.

Hey Mickey, When I constructed my wall section I used different Polyline Solids for the cinder blocks and the mortar in between them. Then when you convert the model to a symbol you can assign different textures and colors to the individual parts. Now when you open the object you can change these features using the Materials tab. Cinder Block Wall.calibz

Here is a hint. The exact same car with the colors of the sky and concrete reversed: So what color is the car? That’s kind of hard to pin down. Let me try to explain how I arrived at the result in the OP. I started out to see if I could get one of the vehicles from the Library Browser to display more realistically in a ray trace. My idea was to place the library symbol on a piece of generic road and see if I could get the road stripes to reflect off of the rocker panels. To do this I obviously needed a more reflective surface than the OOB default supplied by Chief. Chief classifies the Material for the Body Color as a “General Material” and as such you can manipulate several characteristics but not specifically reflectivity. This got me thinking about what type of material would be more reflective and since I was working on a metal car with a shiny paint job I brilliantly deduced that what I needed was a “shiny metal” material. Well imagine my surprise when I opened the Material Class menu and, bingo, one of the choices was “Shiny Metal”. It turns out that one of the characteristics you can control with this class of material is “Reflection” although this can only be done in ray trace views. There is a sliding bar where you can adjust the amount of reflection form 0% to 100% and there is a corresponding color swatch which varies from black to white. Armed with this new material I set out to try a few test RT’s. Since I wanted a highly reflective surface I set “Reflection” to 75% and ran a test run. So here is the first answer to the question. The car I had displayed in the “Perspective Full Overview” camera view I was using for the ray trace was bright red but it turned out that didn’t matter. As the ray trace came into view I was puzzled but pleasantly surprised that the car looked really shiny but it was not red but rather had the blue and gray tones from the surrounding background and sky. Thinking I must have somehow altered the color I went back and opened the material for the car body but it was still bright red. I did a second ray trace and got the same results I had with the first one. Since it was obvious that something was overriding the car’s material color I tried clicking on the color swatch beside the Reflection slider and it opened the Color Selector dbx from whence I was able to change the car’s color. Anyhow, this is what I’ve learned. If you don’t supply a color and use the default black to white values on the Reflection slider you essentially get a clear reflective surface not unlike a chrome surface or a mirror as Jonathan predicted. Everything above the equator bulge of the car reflects the values of the sky and everything below the equator bulge reflect the ground colors. If you supply your own color you will then get a reflective colored surface. So what color is the car? It’s red, but it isn’t. It’s no color or any color. It’s basically like a chameleon; it takes on the color of its surroundings. Hope this isn't TMI. Top row: How cars display in Standard View Middle row: How cars display using default "Shiny Metal" color settings in ray trace Bottom row: How cars display adding color to "Shiny Metal" settings in ray trace

Thanks Michael, it really did turn out better than I thought it was going to. So here's the question for anybody out there (and it might be considered a trick question): What color is the car? Is it a blue car with gray reflections at the bottom or is it a gray car with blue reflections on the top?

That's a lot better than what I had with the wall tools Michael. If I had gotten that close I probably would have run with it. I haven't had a chance to look at your plan yet to see how you got the top of the wall to display properly. Anyway I'm happy with the wall symbol because it just looks more like a cinder block with nice crisp edges and there is the added bonus of being able to change the color of the mortar.

And if your lucky Jere, you won't ever see that construction. I'm not sure what is keeping the whole thing from flopping over. Believe it or not that pop out upper wall is basically cosmetic. I'm not sure what look they were going for. Sort of a poor mans "Falling Water". Unfortunately a more appropriate description would be "Falling Market Value". The cinder block sections have a rudimentary anchor for the vertical 4 x 12 posts. The vertical 4 x 12's have no hardware securing them to the horizontal 4 x 12's above them. In fact 2 of the horizontal roof support beams are not even seated on the corresponding vertical posts.

Well Mike, I don't have a clue how to pull that off using wall and roof tools. I can get you started on a basic shape by using primative cylinders and Solid Subtraction. You would probably have to build all the benches and such piece by piece.

Since I wanted to populate my carport model with somewhat believable automobiles I have been having a play with adjusting the properties of the different materials Chief offers on their Library Browser vehicle symbols. By changing things like material classes and adjusting the associated properties such as Specular, Roughness and Reflection you can coax some pretty nice results out of the OOB symbols.

Just an update for anyone who may be following along at home. Here is the completed carport with the funky cinder block wall segments. BTW, (standing up and shaking my fist at the monitor and probably about to regret making this statement ) I defy anybody to create that right side carport wall using Chief's wall tools and textures so that it will display properly in all view types. Here is a "crappy" 10 pass ray trace and the corresponding watercolor w/line drawing showing the results.

No need to type in the inches symbol here Gene. Just the number for a positive amount and a minus sign and the number for a negative amount.

Wow! I hate when that happens. Crazy how the sofa and end tables are completely untouched.

And people say that Chief's Cad tools aren't very good. Check out this front elevation of the Taj Mahal that I created using just the basic OOB Cad tools: Did I mention that I did it all using the invisible line style.