mbniagara

Numbering Layout Pages in Sequence

Recommended Posts

Hi,

This is my first post.

 

I am considering numbering all of the sheets in my printed layout sequentially even if I am using multiple layout template pages. So for example. my sheets would be numbered A-1,A-2, M-3, M-4, T-5 instead of A-1, A-2, M-1, M-2, T-1.

 

I would want my layout page table to match my sheet numbers and show the same way in the Project Browser.

 

Is their a macro, setting, or work-around to be able to achieve this?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Edit the Page Information "Label Field" as follows:

  • A-%page%, A-%page, M-%page%, M-%page%, T-%page%,,,,,,,, etc.

Normally, it would be:

  • A-#, A-#, M-#, M-#, T-#,,,,,,,etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe has offered you what you wanted to know. I might be so bold as to offer you what you might not have wanted to know. That sounds like a really bad (confusing) idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or you can use CA support for multiple templates in a layout file.

 

Create A-template, M-template, and T template. After page is created assign appropriate template.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gawdzira said:

Joe has offered you what you wanted to know. I might be so bold as to offer you what you might not have wanted to know. That sounds like a really bad (confusing) idea.

I absolutely agree - but he did ask for it.:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe has given you the best answer I know of.

 

For those who don't know this - mbniagra is describing something very close to the traditional way Architect's number drawings.  At least it was when I came up through the ranks - used at many different offices.  It may even be in some AIA standard somewhere.  "A" sheets are architectural.  "M" sheets are mechanical.  "S" are structural, and so on.

 

And I used to use a system where I took it a step further.  My front spec sheets were always A.1.something, floor plans A.2.something.  My elevations were A.3.1, A.3.2, etc.  

 

The reason this is not some very bad idea , is that it takes a big bite out of any renumbering & re-keying woes.  If you find late in the game that you have to add a detail sheet, you don't have to renumber your structural sheets, and chase down all the reference keys.

 

So - my two cents is that the only thing ever truly confusing is if the keys are wrong.  You put a page list on the first page and key correctly - done and dusted.

 

Just my two cents!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, that is what he is not asking for. That is why I chimed in (buttinskied in). What he was asking to do was A1, A2 M3...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To follow up on Wendy's contribution - yes, that page naming convention is an industry standard of sorts.

(Our local jurisdiction requires pages be labeled in this fashion.)

 

Architectural pages are labeled as follows:

A0.0# for plan notes and general

A1.0# for plan views

A2.0# for elevations 

A3.0# first sections

So on

 

Mechanical M0.0#

Structural S0.0#

Etc....

 

Not at computer to delve deeper but I am sure a quick search will offer the full list and description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RL-inc said:

To follow up on Wendy's contribution - yes, that page naming convention is an industry standard of sorts.

(Our local jurisdiction requires pages be labeled in this fashion.)

 

Architectural pages are labeled as follows:

A0.0# for plan notes and general

A1.0# for plan views

A2.0# for elevations 

A3.0# first sections

So on

 

Mechanical M0.0#

Structural S0.0#

Etc....

 

Not at computer to delve deeper but I am sure a quick search will offer the full list and description.

One of the many cities I deal with tried to tell me how to number my pages, I told them I will number them any way I want or go over their head to the city manager , they backed off. This was a new employee that didn't know any better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me started on training new building department employees .:blink:

 

Our plan review department has gone to an eplans system and requires that all pages be named in this way.

It was a bit of a PITA in the beginning but has worked out ok.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DRAWZILLA said:

One of the many cities I deal with tried to tell me how to number my pages, I told them I will number them any way I want or go over their head to the city manager , they backed off. This was a new employee that didn't know any better.

Guess you really showed that new employee something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, the plan checker was stating a preference rather than a code. or something that's required, they really should have known already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Member Statistics

    29128
    Total Members
    9156
    Most Online
    jharmer
    Newest Member
    jharmer
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By woodcraftdesign
      using live camera views in layout, how do I change the size of these in the layout sheet.  I would like my renderings to measure 12" wide but I cannot change the size. Probly just an oversight on my part.  
    • By kylejmarsh
      How can I speed up layout? Seems ridiculous that moving some text WITHIN LAYOUT and not even touching my synced viewports has such an awful lag time. I have a fast computer and the modeling is plenty smooth. I also have used lots of other cad software and even old, clunky dried-up CAD software doesn't have the terrible lag that working in Layout has. 
       
      I've devised ways around it - trying to do everything in my model and nothing or as little as possible in Layout - but this is just bad and seems unnecessary. What is going on within the code when moving text like this takes a few seconds?
       
      Is this common or am I an outlier? I've posted a video of the lag time here - can anybody else corroborate this lag? Is it time for a (nother) computer upgrade, or will even DeepBlue have a similar lag time? Is it some secret setting within chief that is slowing me down like this?
       

      Screen Recording 2021-03-01 at 3.31.31 PM.mov Screen Recording 2021-03-01 at 3.23.19 PM.mov
    • By JamesKCI
      Hey all,
       
      Sorry for the slight tongue-twister of a title. I'm here with another novice question.
       
      When creating roof plans to send to layout, I'm running into an issue. After I choose to display all of my roof planes on the same level, they appear as though the program is deliberately displaying the lower roof planes on top of those that should be above. I've attached a couple snips showing an example of how one of my roof plans is drafted and another two with what that plan looks like in plan view. It's in the roof plan view but it looks the same regardless of the layer set I use.
       
       
      Much Obliged



    • By Primergy1207
      Hey
       
      Anybody that has a tamplate to share for a traditional norwegian home?
       
      Best regards Ole Dehlin
    • By Sunnyfields
      I am trying to do a presentation plan and am using a top down orthographic view with watercolor and overlaid lines. I can't get the resolution I need exporting an image from CA so I have sent the view to Layout as a live view. We also tried it as an image. The problem is that every time I try to create a PDF two walls disappear. The view box is large enough, so I haven't cropped the view, I've had our veteran Chief guy look at it, and we're stumped. Here is the result:
       

      Here is the view in Layout:

      And Here is the print preview:

       
      Has this happened to anyone else? I have tried outputting this about a dozen times and the same two walls are cut off every time. 
       
      I am running CA Premier X12 on a Dell with these bells and whistles. I also have Bluebeam Revu as my PDF print driver in addition to the "Export" function in CA. I have tried to print and to export with the same result . Any help would be appreciated.