Renerabbitt

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4805

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Renerabbitt

  1. Renerabbitt
    Same methods apply
  2. Renerabbitt
    Fillers and partitions are there own category, so just remove them from the cabinet schedule and include them in another schedule but remove base/full/wall cabinets
  3. Renerabbitt
    it doesnt have some features of zom, but easy to work with and yes just runs through a browser and they keep adding features
  4. Renerabbitt
    just had to use zoom and shared my screen..abysmal performance..glad I dont use that anymore, haha
  5. Renerabbitt
    you can make anything that reports to a schedule report to a custom schedule.
  6. Renerabbitt
    not a fan of meet either. I use streamyard which is for more than just video conf calls. Also loom does a great job I hear and transcribes the entire meeting along with downloadable transcribed content with chapterization
  7. Renerabbitt
    There is a Ramshead in the door trim catalogs that is close to this but it does come with fluted pilasters
  8. Renerabbitt
    do you have a photo of what you are looking for? There are some in the White River Hardwoods Catalog
  9. Renerabbitt
    That's because zoom is using hardware acceleration and heavily fights the encoder as it isnt very optimized. Also the reason I do not use Zoom
  10. Renerabbitt
    I responded on my YouTube but you can simply cut the object (ctrl+x) and paste hold it on another floor. thats 3 hotkeys that can be performed in under 2 seconds...modal windows take longer than that to open so its the fastest way
  11. Renerabbitt
    Nothing wrong with your current computer system..not worth the money IMO. My ten year old mobo and cpu on the Evil Dead machine in my sig is only 20% slower than triptych top of the line computer when it comes to raytracing. We are talking just a second or two
  12. Renerabbitt
    you could probably report that, but I don't think it will get very far. Truth of the matter is that this isnt a spherical image, and chief knows it, you would get warping as it was stretching around a globe. It didnt used to work this way but it works in a way that benefits more beginners because they just want to load in an image and have it show in the background. So instead of a planer projection chief is doing something else to make it easier for you. Instead...make a true spherical image in photoshop and load it up and use that instead, it will work as I showed in the video since those are backdrops I created
  13. Renerabbitt
    What backdrop are you using? Are you sure it’s spherical?
  14. Renerabbitt
    this would be called a batch rendering and now you cannot. It's part of this suggestion post:
  15. Renerabbitt
    I just spent about 25 minutes on chiefs Crowne Point Model. generated grass to replace my grass texture. a quick grunge overlay on roof, some hand drawn elements on the stone and a bit of editing. its not perfect but it took 25 minutes from opening the file, which needed a few fixes, to editing the shot:
  16. Renerabbitt
    A few things stand out at me but I don't know if you are going for realism etc. The leaves on the ground will always look fake and throw me off...in fact anything in the foreground, if it isnt perfect..and I mean perfect, just shouldn't be there. Like the plants, I know that's part of the design, but they look so fake that I don't even notice the house. I would use some other photo to illustrate that landscaping and avoid having them in the shot. the people will always look fake unless you use ai to replace them. the fire look fake, and photoshop has a fire generated you could use. the pavers need to be a better texture in my opinion, same with the stone wall. The black point on your backdrop needs to be lowered...your blacks look like they have a white wash on them.
  17. Renerabbitt
    aha, that one went right over my head. bar down
  18. Renerabbitt
    You might want to call chief, this works as intended: 240329.mp4
  19. Renerabbitt
    FYI Smoothing angle number represent the angle threshold to which smoothing will be applied on two adjacent faceted faces. This goes in all directions xyz. So this number for obvious reasons can go up to 179, as in 179 degrees before facets are planar
  20. Renerabbitt
    why was this obvious? why 99?
  21. Renerabbitt
    I would spend some time trying to make some better materials. That's always going to be a major difference. You are talking about a software that uses 1K textures vs one that utilizes 4-8K textures Not to mention TM has a holw lot of other tricks up its sleaves. Bicubic/tri/planar projection re-mapping, sepearate backdrop and light sources from HDRI's, better caustics...all kinds of things
  22. Renerabbitt
    Use regular text instead of rich text and it’s not an issue
  23. Renerabbitt
    your sample rate is set to 1000 in rendering technique options on your walkthrough at 2.5K resolution 30 seconds of video *30 frames/second=900 *1000 samples=900,000 1000 samples/36 samples-per-second on a 4090 = 25,000 seconds=~ 7 hours to render so probably around 10 hours for you Also you should put a roof on her to mitigate the light bleed at the ceiling BTW you are sharing PCI lanes with your graphics cards with those two extra M.2 drives
  24. Renerabbitt
    we would need to know the raytrace settings of the walkthrough. save a plan with the walkthrough path, bubble it and upload it
  25. Renerabbitt
    You would need to find or model a 3d mesh of that object and then convert it to an electrical fixture class, specifiy it as a light, and generate the offsets for your light source as well as any other lighting data you may need. You'd also need to specify how it mounts and you may need to adjust the offsets of XYZ in the 3d panel of the light's dbx