Joe_Carrick

Either put the Cross Section Camera on the desired Floor - or set it to display on all floors.

I use Dropbox for the Chief Data Folder. Each compute has it's own Dropbox Folder linked to the Cloud Dropbox Folder. It works fine for me, keeping all libraries, etc synched.

I have no problem with Layout Page Templates not being at the end. You just have to make sure you specify which page template is to be used for each page of your Layout. Here's an example: ============================= Page 0 - Default Page Template - includes my Architects License Stamp Pages 1-6 - General Sheets use "Default Page Template"; Label = "G-#" Pages 7-20 - Architectural Sheets use "Default Page Template"; Label = "A-#" Page 21 - Structural Page Template Pages 22-28 - Structural Sheets use "Structural Page Template"; Label = "S-#" Pages 29-32 - Electrical Sheets use "Default Page Template"; Label = "E-#" Pages 33-35 - Mechanical Sheets use "Default Page Template"; Label = "M-#" Pages 36-38 - Plumbing Sheets use "Default Page Template"; Label = "P-#" ============================= Notice that the only difference between the 2 Page Templates is the existence of my License Stamp. The position of the "Structural Page Template" at page 21 doesn't effect pages 29-38 because those pages are specified to use the "Default Page Template". This is my standard Layout Template File and not all sheets are used on every project. When I elect to do my own structural engineering I simply change Pages 22-28 to use the "Default Page Template". and then my License stamp is included on those sheets as well.

For quality purposes I almost always use 5/8" gyp bd everywhere. It just makes a much more solid wall.and/or ceiling.

I would charge $300 for the macro system. Learning to create macros requires 3 things: Learning the Ruby scripting language Learning what object attributes are available in Chief. Determining how you should access and use the attributes.

This can be done - but it's a big job because you have to accumulate all the wall materials as well as the opening sizes (stored in a global variable) and then read that data to create the output totaled. In order for it to be accurate it would need to be updated at periodic intervals. IMO it's not worth the effort but I can provide you with a price if you want me to create the required macros.

OK, so try this one. It uses (2) 1/16" cubes to set the bounding box limits - basically invisible Clothes_Washer_2_JPC.calibz

Here's my version with a 5" spacer at the back and a 1" spacer at the front. It's correct in both 2D and 3D with the bounding box the correct size and position. Clothes_Washer_JPC.calibz

Actually, the bounding box size and the 3D origin offsets work fine. You can adjust the bounding box size and set the 3D origin y-offset to -5". That will make it look right in 3D and set it 5" from the back wall. The problem is that the 2D block does not synchronize with the 3D origin offsets.

One way to do this is to add a 3D object to the symbol itself (an invisible 5" cube at the back would work) so that the bounding box includes that space automatically. Another option is a set of small (1/16" diameter spheres) at each corner of the desired bounding box. They can be "No Material" or "Transparent" so they won't be visible but will provide the limits for the bounding box. When the symbol is created, those little spheres are included in the symbol definition and set the bounding box size and location.

Does anyone have experience with using this product? It would seem to be a good alternative for a Garage Floor above a Basement. In the past, I have done such garage floors with Heavy Timber Beams, Joists and 1-1/4" Plywood sub-floor. In some cases I've used a tile finish floor and in other cases just 2" concrete. Comments appreciated.

I'm working on a custom home that will have a Walk-out Basement. The wall on the front will be a 10' retaining wall and the 2 side walls will be retaining also but varying from 0 to 10'. I will be using SIP's for the upper 2 floors. The lower floor (Basement) will be either CMU or ICF with a stone veneer. My questions if I use ICF are as follows: What thickness would be appropriate for the 10' retaining wall? How would the stone veneer be applied? Should all of the lower floor walls be ICF and if so full height? At the main floor level (top of wall) can I simply have a 2x6 PT plate with joists on top of the ICF? Where should the upper floor SIP walls align with the ICFs? If instead I use CMU: Would you use CMU for the entire lower floor exterior walls or would you use SIPs for the "walk-out" walls (ie: walls above grade)? Assuming the retaining wall is a combination of 8" CMU with a 48" tall 12" CMU pony wall, which face would you align (inner or outer)? Note: In either case, I will be using an engineered retaining wall (thickness and reinforcing)

Mike, Win 10 Home has exactly the same screens. I simple copy/pasted the Windows Help info. It's the same thing - the Help File has evidently not been updated for a couple of versions of Windows.

Does anyone have a detail for a 10' tall CMU retaining wall with engineering calcs? This will be for a walkout basement and the top will be supported by the floor diaphragm above.

Not that I know of - but you could do a "Snip" and print that.

Many times I've asked for a 2D LineStyle creation tool (railroads, insulation, etc) with optional beginning and ending terminators. The use of just dashes, spaces, text and the limited "Arrows" as terminators is quite restrictive.

Only partly - when the dialog doesn't show what is available, confusion abounds. Note that I said "It seems ……" You think maybe?

I'm really looing for Simpson CC86 (8" post and 6" wide beam) with bolts. There's one in the 3D Warehouse but it's CC66 and ECC66 as a single symbol. I've tried deleting surfaces but am unable to get rid of all of them and consequently the resulting symbol doesn't stretch properly - even with stretch planes.

I'm working on a project where I have some Heavy Timber Posts and Beams. I would like to use Black Iron Post Caps, etc. Does anyone have such 3D Symbols?

No, it seems CA has limited those dimensions to 1/16" increments. It would require a programming change - so you could submit a suggestion but I am doubtful that it would ever get implemented even though is should be easy to do.

You just need to set the "Opens with" setting in the properties for that type of file. In Windows: Open the File Browser Select a "calibz" file and open the "Properties Panel" "Opens with:" CHANGE Select "Chief Architect X11" -or- Step (1): First of all, open Control Panel in Windows 10 PC and then go to Programs. Step (2): On Programs window, click on " Make a file type always open in a specific program " option... Step (3): Now, the Set Associations tool will start loading. Step (4): Select the file extension whose application you want to change and then select the APP you want it to open with. On a MAC it will be something similar. We have to do this with each new version of Chief.

Shane, Have you upgraded to version X11? Your signature still shows only X10. BTW, I think those defaults (Carpet, etc) are now controlled on a "Room Type" basis. Show you would need to change the Room Type definitions.

I know for a fact that version 9.5 used a USB Hasp. I've never heard of Chief having a Serial Port Hasp but I suppose it could have.

Doesn't your new computer have a USB Port?

That's actually 8"R/9"T with a 1" nosing. It was allowable for private stairs in the UBC and for existing homes that would generally be grandfathered with the current IRC - but only for existing stairs.