rlackore

I've found dragging to delete a point is sometimes problematic. Usually it works fine, but sometimes you have to zoom in really close to make sure you're snapping to the correct point on the polyline. I would love a command to select a point and delete it instantly.

When I change a plan material definition, CA goes through an agonizingly slow process of "Building 3D Model." For instance, I just changed the fill color on a material. After clicking "OK" in the Define Material dbx CA pops up the "Building 3D Model" notification box a total of 10 times. Each time it tells me it is Merging, Generating Surfaces, and Finalizing for all the floor levels. I didn't change the model or any 3D data - just a color, not even a texture map, bump map, etc. And this is in vector view, no fancy settings. I had to wait 1 minute and 10 seconds until I regained control of the program. My computer isn't blazing fast, but it has 24gig of RAM and a 2gig of VRAM onboard the GPU. 3D operations in CA are dog slow.

I've had lots of problems with fascias and frieze boards not building properly, even with roof planes that have been "joined" by CA. Sometimes the trim will show up properly during one session, then will disappear during another session. Sometimes there seems to be no rhyme or reason. Everyone in my office runs across this problem.

I use SketchUp for creating custom 3D content for use in CA. I export from SU as .obj, and import into CA. I've never tried exporting a 3D format from CA into SU, so I can't speak to how well that works.

Then all is forgiven.

Got it. I think I recall this discussion in the old forum, many moons ago. I agree we need some kind of resolution.

The stair dbx allows me to check "Include Bottom Rails on Landings", but I can't figure out how to control the height or profile of the bottom rail. I would also like to specify the newel spacing on a landing, but can't figure that out either. Any insight is appreciated.

Didn't you view it as well? Tsk, tsk.

This would be solved if we could discretely set the origin point of the symbol, both in 3D and in 2D.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I think the point is that we DON'T have the ability to offset the CAD from the 3D - only the ability to offset the 3D from the CAD. We should be able to specify the origin of the symbol, for sure. Personally, I don't think I've ever needed the ability to offset the 2D representation of the symbol from the 3D representation.

Problem is, it's a default. Lets say you set the default to 12" to eliminate clutter in your section; well, in elevation, you will lose your exterior framing members, such as deck framing, posts, etc. This default has potential, but it is poorly implemented.

Might be useful if it could be implemented on a per-view basis, eg I want to use a framing back-clip in cross-section, but not in elevation. We had a suggestion thread about more control over section clip planes, so maybe this kind of setting (or at least concept) shouldn't be abandoned entirely.

Parapets are an option. Either way, the roof will need a slope, typically 1:96 or 1:48 as minimums (check codes). You can achieve the required slope of the roof plane through the roof structure, or with tapered insulation. Of course, choice of membrane and proper detailing of flashing is essential.

From the image it appears you are in Standard view, so it may be that the siding has a texture file applied that may subtly change the color value of the material.

On-center stud spacing is set in the material definition for the wall's main layer (select "framing" as the material type). To control the framing within any particular wall, set a framing reference marker on the end you want the framing to start, then select the wall, right click, and "Build Framing for Selected Object(s)."

Dshall, nice video, thanks. However, offsetting should be easier, as you observed. I know I'm guilty of a bias, but in AutoCAD I can activate an offset command, enter a value for distance and angle (or click on two points to define distance and angle), then begin offsetting objects by selecting them. I can offset as many objects as I want until I exit the command; it's a very powerful, fast, intuitive feature, and CA should have similar functionality.

I've noticed the same thing. If the line isn't at a "nice" angle, the offset distance is completely fubar.

Symbol needs to be defined as Millwork.

I've tried a few different ways to create demo plans. I've found the method that Gawdzira and jscussel propose works the best, though imperfectly.

I was able to go in to the room dbx, Ceiling Finish, and change it to the non-rotated material, worked fine.

Maybe there is some confusion caused by the pattern not being rotated by 90 degrees as well? -- Never mind, my mistake --

X5 file attached. Plot X5.zip

Andy, Yes, you are correct. I'm no expert with CA coordinate entry - I must have messed up one of the arcs. The closure isn't perfect, but it's as close as you can expect. Plot.zip

The solid square is a utility easement. The survey data is incorrect. I'd contact the surveyor and ask for the file in dxf/dwg format, then import into CA.

It shouldn't be this difficult, should it.