SHCanada2

...I have multiple cross sections in my template plan, one for stairs, one for garage, a few for kitchen... so I am not changing the layerset and back clip all the time you may be able to do the same thing with wall elevations, and/or use the "clip to room" feature of a section (not sure if you get the same result as wall elevation)

if its consistently your antivirus, you may wish to exclude it scanning CA directories and see if that helps

this should be posted in the Q&A

roofr.com I think does it

what is quite interesting is it says it takes a measurement across the room as well, and can see if it is a cabinet or washer or... so it must be sanity checking its own wall measurements with this across the room measurement. In theory I would think that would improve the whole stitching problem

ironically, their demo picture shows the person measuring the wall between 2 cabinets: but their how it works video says it needs to see the wall corners. never trust marketing!

locked layer maybe. i'd select the all layers on layerset and then see if you can delete them. another possibility is a referenced layerset

and you know its southern Alberta circa 1990 to 2010 houses when the only trees you see in a suburb are columnar aspens..

interesting how it first put the front yard tree behind the house. And it almost got the fence house connection right, pretty close. although it looks like the house is bigger that it was at the peak in the original. curious, can you tell it to make it smaller maintaining the aspect ratio?

There has been a lot of discussion on this, and I think the end result is as you do it above (make copies and keep log of changes) is the best way

The core catalog E21 shows proud for some reason I think I either fixed this before(as the "correct" E21 door is in my user catalog, shows as E21A int he video ). I do not see a setting, and simply changing to the E21 Door, you can see in the preview that it pops out. Is there a setting I am missing. They both show as Reccessed->Sheathing layer: 25.04.2026_22.31.46_REC.mp4

I'm not suggesting you are...just trying to find out the differences that make an impact. If you saw some worthwhile differences, that is good enough for me to give it a whirl

sure I'll try it out on my brother's. send me the beta link. At a few hundred dollars a month, one question I would have is what to I get better than a generic AI, standardized forms maybe?

you might want to try the chatroom forum. navigate first to "home" at the top left

i was just about going to ask if I get a money back guarantee, and then I saw this: Always cross-reference the output with the official municipal code for permit submissions. The analysis is designed to accelerate your research, not replace the final legal review. ...never heard of a "legal review", but regardless what it looks like is a AI tool that summarizes the zoning bylaws for a specific zone. My brother just tried a different AI on the city's feedback on his proposal, and I would say it gave a decent start, but certainly not anything "intelligent". I.e. the City has a statutory document that states that for lots that are more than 20% slope, it needs geotechnical, but he AI is not intelligent enough to figure out from the survey what the lot slope is to see if the rule applies