GeneDavis

It's a toggle, and you might want to add the three buttons to your toolbar, as most need to swap and change depending on situation, and it's too tedious to make the change going to Edit>Preferences>Marquee Selection . . . See the attached for all three added to the toolbar: Contained, Intersected, and Centers.

I am doing CAD details, relating to callouts in plan views, and sending to layout at preferred scale, then in layout, choosing the label for the box as callout. See the attached screencaps. I did the link in the callout dialog in the plan view to tie the callout to the CAD detail. Using the link apparently brings in the label text for over the line (it's the title of the CAD detail) and the scale in layout. The scale is picked up by the program code. Must be. I want to be able to control the text size and left-center-right alignment, and cannot figure how. I made the label text size, which is controlled in layout, not plan, to be 1/8" high, larger than the detail text and dimensions, which comes in at 3/32" height. I'd like that scale note below the label line to be this, the 3/32" height. If this is not possible with present programming, I will file a suggestion.

Thanks, Scott. That helps. In your video you do what I want to do, which is to link the callout to the CAD detail, and populate the label for the detail with its number and page. I looked at the plan file for Nashville which was done in X13 (at least that is where it is in my archives) and see that for the CAD details in that plan, you created one (just one) CAD detail for all the CAD details used in the layout, so there was no linking. Your video is showing the linking which I guess is a new feature in X14. Might be nice for a future release (and I will repeat this in Suggestions) to be able to auto number CAD details within a "type letter." Plot details begin with P, foundation details begin with F, architectural details (maybe just called plan details) start with A, electrical with E, cabinets C, etc.

What's the diff?

I'm not good at finding the training vids for this. Please help me out. I want to do callouts for details, exactly as Chief is showing in the Batchelor View sample file. See the clips attached. I know I could download the plan file and examine things, but this one was done in an earlier version of Chief, and since I am in 14 with enhanced stuff for linkages, etc., I want to use all the new tools.

That's a workaround, Eric, and I'd thought about it but had not done it. Thought there might be something I am missing. I set it to 1/64, but the DBX reads zero. There's a circle there, though. Very tiny and no one will see it when reading prints. I guess the callout concept is not really applicable to plan views.

I like the auto features of this callout for giving labels to plan views, but how does one lose the callout (in this case the blank circle) in the label?

I recall doing a change suggestion about this. Not the mull joint issue, but that of mulled windows not matching the reality of window products when mulled. In the northern climes, where brands like Andersen, Marvin, Kolbe and Kolbe, and others ship product, the window frames are two or more inches less in depth than the 2x6 wallframes in which they mount. Jamb extensions at 2" and more reach are done, but for a mulled window, the jamb extensions wrap the mulled unit, not each individual window. Chief gives us the wrong look. You can sort of get close to real world details by setting the jamb width to something like 3.5 inches, then mull the units, but there is a hole all around where the jamb extensions go. If you want, you can fill it with your own jamb extension, done using a 3D molding. See the attached.

I am stumped in X14 Premium. Working on first set of con docs with this new release, and cannot seem to control the layout box label text size. Admittedly, this is my first time using layout box labels. I'd been in the habit of supressing labels and writing labels with layout text. It seems to be set to generate 1/8" high text in the settings (see attached) but the text measures 1/4" high. I cannot find the setting to change it.

Solved! Deleted the window in layout and ran it again, and it's OK and with cornerboards.

I tried to find what that page is all about, and clicking "help" produces nothing.

Two pics attached. One, no corner boards, is from the layout page. What was sent was plot lines. The other, is the view that opens when the layout window is opened. Why would the edge lines of corner boards not get sent to layout?

In the pic I snapped of what the auto story pole thing did, the elevation of the top of foundation, basement floor, and top of foundation are shown in inches, not feet-inches. Above elevation are shown as feet-inches. Why the diff? My manually dimensioned section shows the second floor rough elevation. It also shows the bearing wall plate height the center bay trusses stand on.

I've a front elevation and did the auto story pole thing. There are some things I don't understand. Why do elevations above the zero (equals floor 1 rough floor) display in feet inches fractions, but below in inches fractions. My plan has only two plate heights. The side wings have everything at 10'-0". The center bay scissors trusses stand on walls for which the framing plate height was manually set at 16'-6 3/4". There seems to be no way to pick up that elevation with the auto story pole command. Why? As seen in the dimensioned building section, there's a loft floor (floor 2) for which the rough floor elevation is 12'-0". I have the percentage reach set to get to that floor, but the story pole result does not include that elevation. Why? The auto story pole results picked up a plate height of 21' something, but there is no plate there at all. Where does it get its plate heights?

Porches are easy with Chief railing tools. I do them mostly using post to beam as shown in the attached. But Chief does not treat the members as structure for doing structural material reporting. I can readily change the railing to invisible, and then manually frame it with framing tools, but is this best practice?

It was a combination of things. The main floor framing directly below has the pair of LVLs as a drop beam. I copied them then went to floor 1 where I have the roof, pasted and held position, then edited height, member height, and role (roof beam). Not enough to get into material list as wanted, so I deleted and manually placed and all OK now.

I manually placed a pair of LVLs which make a beam into which trusses and rafters head. In the spec, I selected ROOF BEAM as role. They report into the subfloor section. Why?

I have not changed OOB X14 and exterior framed walls and interior framed walls are 1/2" layer, texture "drywall 48 x 96" which produces what I want for the material list, which is the wallboard sheet count. I messed myself up by painting. I say painting, but what I did was to change my wall definitions for the sheetrock 1/2" layer to a color, then stupidly used the eyedropper and spray can to paint all around. I want to repaint now. I have a mess of rooms which got the paint treatment and so do not report drywall. I went into defaults and set my default exterior wall as 1/2 drywall 48 x 144 and then a zero thickness color layer of a green paint color. Same for interior walls, same drywall and color layer. But the spraypainted surfaces are still all white. I need some training.

It may have something to do with the data points we have for roofs not being colinear. The baseline elevation point and ridge elevation points are colinear, in that they sit on the rafter line, but fascia height does not.

Thanks, Larry. I was overthinking it.

Here, see if this will open. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vrc1ujzh36w2yze/Farmhouse w loft.plan?dl=0

The file is way too big to upload, but I am trying to reestablish Dropbox. For now, maybe a hint might come forth. The problem wall is the rear gable, sort of a mirror of the front gable, which frames, except that there is an abutting lower roof. That abutment is fine, with the roof plane stopping at the exterior siding outer layer. The wall is visible in all 3D. I set it to frame same as the front gable, which is to balloon through ceiling above and floor below. You can see in the pic of the front frame, all went well. I need to edit the wall frame bottom to raise it up onto the steel beam there. But what is up with the rear? The short segments that wing out from the interior wall frame, but not the main tall center.

The actual build requires steel to support the loft, landing, and staircase. You can see in these images, taken from my Sketchup workout, how it's done. A W12x16 beam has two smaller WF beams hung and cantilevering to support the loft's "pulpit" top stairs landing, and the stairs are enabled with some 5" channels. The thin landing is framed with 1.5" square tubing to which is bolted 2x2 lumber parts, so as to have nailing for the wood buildup. The reason I did the two-tread upper run of stairs as stairs and not landings, is because with stairs, I could do the panel railing, the panel type being cable.

No. The landing must be thin. I have a workaround. Just thought of it and tried it in the test file. Make the material for the upper stair section's risers as "opening - no material" and it's gone. No projection down through. Then take a section, do CAD detail from view, and make the closed p'line for the 3D solid that gets placed correctly so the surfaces are all there where wanted. See the attached. I left the solid as concrete material so it can be distinguished from the stair parts.

I've a staircase rising to a landing then making a 90 turn and a short section with two treads going to the target second floor. The surface that is the bottom tread riser of the short section is poking through the thin landing, and I would like to lose it. See the images. My house model is in excess of 50MB and way to big to attach, so I did a simple workout plan with the same stairs geometry to show the issue, and it is attached. It is the "ghost riser" surface I have going through. It is a single surface and so does not render in 3D, but is evident in vector and 3D vector views. How can it get its bottom edge dragged up into the landing? Stairs workout.plan