Doug_N

Larry, I agree with you completely. Any who thinks this is the last price increase from CA is not paying attention to the rest of the world. Of course, the price will go up, even if it is just to keep pace with inflation. Also I see a lot of griping about the differential between Chief, Revit, AutoCAD (not really a great tool for houses), ArchiCAD etc. If the only reason you are using CA is the price, well then, by all means switch. You can use a wrench as a hammer, but it may not be the best tool. In my professional opinion, CA is the best tool (THE BEST TOOL) (for those not listening) for designing houses. There are still some issues. Setting up wall alignments, small offsets along a wall, railing offsets, deck attachments to an exterior wall, and deck support flexibility among others, but by and large, CA is the best in its class and getting better. I for one, can hardly wait for X15 to launch, so I am a current SSA subscriber. Keep tuned and pay your damned SSA so that you will get it as well. Regarding this user group. One of the features that makes this such a great group is that CA supports it. Every once and a while there will be someone from CA that will comment on our post, issue a helpful comment or suggest that we make a comment in the suggestion forum, or even contact support. What other company does that? None that I am aware of. To all of my colleagues out there who support this user group and forum, thank you, thank you thank you. I feel that you are all out there hoping for my success, just as I do for you. What a great group. I feel privileged to be part of this.

https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverresults.aspx/147971/en-us/ If you are not using the studio driver (instead of the gaming driver) then you may experience crashes or poorer performance in my experience.

I think some of you are missing an important aspect of marketing the program to new users. One of the hard selling points of the current sales models is the initial buy in at about 3k. The new model lowers that hurdle to 2k. This should open the door for more first-time users by lowering the bar. Right now, you can rent CA for $200 per month. That is the same as the new model. The company needs to change its revenue model to keep up with development and improvements as the program becomes more fully featured and configurable. Making changes often means rewriting existing code to make everything compatible, and as a former code writer, I know that sometimes you have painted your program into a corner and to make an improvement it means a serious trashing of existing code, and long hours of doing a major rewrite. There can be a number of reasons for that. For example, something that is baked into the code now is going to be a variable, so every place that the variable is used error trapping has to be written to ensure that the program doesn't make ridiculous decisions. Debugging new code is a mind-numbing process. Most of that is done long before a program is ready for BETA testing. We all wanted CA to expand and be more capable. Well now we are getting that, and we have to pay for those new features. As for comparing CA to Word or MS Office pricing, how many users does MS Office have V.S, CA users? The fewer the users, the higher the cost burden.

Anyone know if I can get a circle's diameter or radius in Ruby?

Chris I was just adding to your good post.

Not a fixed price, the same price for the next billing period. +

The trick in the section view is to use cad lines and you can use the terrain perimeter layer to assist in creating those likes by doing a view to cad, deleting the lines that you don't want, adding lines to fill in where you need them, then making all the cad lines you want into a block. Edit the block and change the lines to some custom layer such as "terrain section 1" and then save it. Now go back to the section view, turn off the terrain perimeter layer, and use past and hold to past the block. If you can't see it, make sure that you turn on your custom layer. That should be what you need.

For those of you that have been comparing CA to Revit Lt, isn't this sort of comparing a wrench to a pair of pliers? They both are tools to get a job done, and they will both do somewhat similar things, but here is a list of some (picked by me) features side by side and a cost comparison. I only did the comparison for Revit Lt. If you are on a apple, forget Revit or any AutoCAD product. Apple is not supported. Here is a link to the US Revit site to do your own investigation https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit/compare Dec 7, 2022 Comparison of CA and Revit Lt CA Revit Lt Import Files PDF X Dwg X X Images X X Sketchup X Point Cloud Features Lighting X Rendering X Schedules X Customize Visibility X Macros X Catalogs X Blocks Systems X X MS Windows X X Apple OS X Create 2D Dwgs X X Export PDF X Revision Notation X X Revision Tracking X Dimensions X X Annotation X X Phasing X X Material Takeoff X X Lighting Analysis X Column Schedules Framing X Trusses X View Filters X Layer Control X X

I have been thinking about this change a lot. I wonder how much of the house design market that CA has? How much can it grow? I do a fair bit of work in the Toronto and surrounding area here in Canada, and I don't run into many designers or architects that are my competitors that use CA. Why not, I wonder? No sales presence in Canada is only likely reason. But Canada is a much smaller market as well, perhaps 10% of the US market. As for the pricing model in the near future, the subscription model is not much different than the SSA agreement. No perpetual license model is a problem for anyone who has a long dry period in business, but there seems to be a drift in this direction from all software companies, and even some automobile companies. (Yes I am looking at you GM and Tesla). In my opinion, the step here is a bit of a stumble. It lets in people who would have balked at the current perpetual license fee of $3,295 that is true. I wonder how many of us are SSA subscribers? Would we all be willing to pay, say, $750 per year to help CA achieve a better level of sustainability? In a way this increase will have the newcomers paying to haul our freight to some extent, but over time we will fade out, and in a decade or so, there will only be newcomers. I am an AutoCad subscriber as well, and still have my license, but let me tell you, AutoDesk does not support their users the way that Chief does. They are constantly changing and fractionalizing their products, so you have to bob and weave to get what you need to do what you did last year. No point in complaining to AutoDesk either because they are deaf to user pain. The support that CA supplies in the forum is so much appreciated, that I can't believe my luck to be a CA user. That is what sets CA apart from other companies in this field. In any case, after this long winded and rambling post, I offer my assurance that I will continue to be a CA user and maintain my SSA and even support a modest bump in price to see CA succeed.

Ahh the thread in announcements! I didn't see that.

I saw that on the website, but what thread are you referring to?

According to an email that I just received from CA, as of January 10, 2023 CA will only be available as a subscription license. For those of us that have a current CA license with a paid up SSA agreement, our agreement continues at the same price ($595 per year) so long as the SSA does not lapse. If you let it lapse, then you are required to switch to the subscription model and that is going to cost Annual subscription: $1,995 (if paid annually). If there ever was a incentive to get or keep your SSA agreement in place... this is it!

Nice catch Glenn

There are two ways. I) start with a metric template or 2) Change the dimension format to metric.

In this plan the coach house is a symbol, so there is not much that can be done with that. Do you have the plan file for that building? It is sort of implied that you do. To combine the two buildings into one plan, and assuming that you move the coach house into the main dwelling plan, open both plan files. Go to the coach house drawing and using the edit area tool select all areas. Copy that, then in the house and past the coach house in a location away from the house so that they do not overlap. Do not click on anything for now. The geometric centre of the pasted coach house assembly will still be highlighted with a grip. Click on that and drag the coach house to the desired position. You can reuse the edit all tool to make final adjustments to the coach house's position if needed. You might want to make a new copy of the house file before doing this to keep the original plan files should you need to start over.

I did a brief video that illustrates one possible method for making the "shed dormer". https://1drv.ms/v/s!Am8Ktm_KVQE5hP1wpWOfazmGUWO3Wg?e=SoF6sx

Technically, the trim that is done over a door such as in your picture is not a lintel. A lintel is a structural element that supports the weight of the wall over a wall opening and distributes it to the surrounding walls. In construction the term header is often used in place of the word lintel, although in some building codes the structural element over a wall element is only referred to as a lintel, and header is not defined. There are technical terms for the crown molding over a door or window but the term lintel is not one of them. While in classical architecture an architrave was a structural element that spanned columns, in modern times this word is more commonly attributed to the shape of the casing that finishes off a door or window frame to hide the gap between the jamb or frame and the finished wall. On exterior doors and windows the part at the top that protrudes is sometimes called a cornice. A cornice (from the Italian word for ledge) is generally any horizontal decorative moulding that crowns a building or furniture element. For example, the cornice over a door or window among other architectural feature. The end of my architectural history lesson for today.

Aha!!! Thanks guys!!! Brilliant!

Parametric door styles??? Where can I find those?

I know this has come up before somewhere, but for the life of me, searches don't seem to find the topic. When a window mimics the roof pitch (can be done in the window DBX) you get a window with a top slope mimicking the roof slope. So far so good. Not so much for doors. Because the door is made of a door symbol and a door frame assembly the door frame can get adjusted but not the door itself. The door ends up sticking out through the sloping part of the frame and ends up exposed, sometimes over the roof. (This is particularly true of doors under stairs) Does anyone know how to actually make a door that slopes like the frame?

Good catch Michael. The limit wasn't a problem for this job but it conceivably could be a problem at some point.

I use the A S D W keys... oh wait, that is for world of tanks! Never mind.

I agree with Joe, plus an i7 twelfth gen is lots. My system generates PB views within a few seconds. What more do you need?

Well done! I have done the same, but haven't had the time to post the result. I was surprised by CA's limit on roof slope to 96 in 12 though. That is a bit of a problem but this as built drawing will be good enough for my purposes. Thanks for posting this.

Here is a video that I did on dormers and other tricky roof planes. For your case, skip forward to 2:29 in the video.