rlackore

Members
  • Posts

    3052
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rlackore

  1. I do mezzanines as a second floor level, with the "non-mezzanine" portion as "open to below". Others use the new shelf ceiling feature, but I think a second floor level works best for setting up the stairs and railings.
  2. When I do pre-engineered steel buildings I don't worry about the steel shapes - only the column base locations and dimensions, and the general arrangement of the wall/roof layers (outset girts, inset girts, etc.). My building and wall sections use a lot of CAD. All other aspects of modeling the building are standard Chief techniques.
  3. Loading is slow! I had to use Edge - the Viewer never seems to work for me in Chrome. Anyway, the elevations in your OP fooled me as much as they fooled Rod - I thought the area beneath the funky projection was a deck, but it's just a roof. I still think the best solution for the funky projection is wood frame, clad in TAFS, with a grey-colored TPO membrane for the top, flashed at the perimeter with a color-matched drip edge. GRP would give you more color choices, but maybe GRP isn't readily available in Florida. That said, looking at the model in 3D, I have to agree that Rod has a point - that funky projection seems like a lot of work for nothing. If it was sheltering a deck area it could be justified, but it's not even shading the roof-top a/c units! I'm sure there are other considerations, but maybe you could eliminate the horizontal portion, along with the supports, and keep only the main vertical element that serves to break up the side facade. But, I suppose it's a personal choice - I believe form should have some kind of function.
  4. It's a plaza deck! Why would you enclose it? The loss of a primary outdoor living/entertaining space is probably a non-starter for the client. Sure, there are challenges, but enclosing the space isn't the best answer.
  5. I hate balconies and decks over living spaces, but it happens all the time. I think finding a competent installer is more important than the system. I don't have any experience using a GRP membrane as a traffic wear layer - around here we typically use PVC membranes.
  6. Alan, there has to be some kind of pitch to those flat portions, right? You're preferred method of 18" deep wood trusses could accomplish this easily. I don't see any substantial benefit to CFS over wood, unless the rest of the project is framed in CFS and the contractor doesn't want to mix materials/systems. I'd consider wood frame, excellent flashing details, and a fully-adhered TPO or gel-coat GRP membrane for the low-slope roof piece.
  7. Maybe the Chatroom is a better place for this discussion.
  8. Raquel, maybe you're not longer monitoring this thread, but if you are, I recommend learning Sketchup. It's become a critical part of my Chief workflow, has many available plugins that make things easier, and can create your cabinet piece for import into Chief as a Symbol: caffevero.skp
  9. Even easier: 1. Draw a CAD profile and save it to your library: 2. Draw an arc and convert it to a molding polyline, then add the profile: 3. Position it within the cabinets: This method provides the lovely rounded edges on the curved piece.
  10. Yes, Method 2 with the upper floor using a pony wall with height above floor set to 0":
  11. I've Suggested gradient fills. If anyone else wants to +1 the suggestion, maybe we can get Chief to provide them.
  12. 1. Draw a truncated pyramid as so: This will be the curved counter piece. 2. Draw a cylinder in the center of the pyramid. Make it taller than the pyramid. This will be subtracted from the pyramid: 3. Boolean subtract the cylinder from the cone: 4. Draw a box, larger than the pyramid, and do another boolean subtraction: 5. In ortho view, grab the rotate handle and rotate the shape 180 degrees to the proper orientation: 6. Now position the shape relative to the counter: What this technique can't give you are the rounded edges on the curved shape, so a better alternative would be to create the shape in another program, such as Sketchup. That said, someone else on the forum may have a better method.
  13. I agree. When you said "site map", I automatically assumed you meant a site plan, intended to communicate the legal boundaries, building location, etc. I would classify the images you posted as landscape plans. I agree that site plans in Chief are a bit more difficult (IMO) due to the lack of advanced CAD features. And it doesn't take too much additional effort to add colors and patterns: Granted, my example is pretty basic, but it's a start.
  14. You're bearing wood on steel? The easiest method is to attach a wood bearing plate to the top of the steel (I believe you have this shown). The plate-to-steel connection depends on 1) uplift (maybe seismic?), 2) thickness of beam top flange, and 3) thickness of bearing plate. If the top flange isn't too beefy, you may be able to use self-drilling screws; otherwise you're stuck with bolts or stud anchors. Fabricators are used to drilling bolt holes on either side of the web, typically at 24" oc; but, again, you need to verify the size/spacing for the expected forces.I would be just as concerned with the design in regard to thermal bridging at the beam/exterior wall interface - but maybe you've got that covered. FWIW, I sometimes prefer S-shapes (rails) over W-shapes for exterior exposed applications - the aggressive slope on the S-shape flange helps drainage and deters nesting birds. Plus, if you're not familiar with the standards for Architecturally Exposed Structural Steel, check out AESS Code of Standard Practice at AISC.org.
  15. That looks like a good solution - better than mine, I think. Auto-framing, however, is a mess (the left is mine, the right is Joes'):
  16. I think your best bet is to create a custom symbol with the proper pitch: then insert it without casing, etc., and lay a window pass-through over it and adjust the pass-through arch to match the roof: It's a bit of work, but not too much.
  17. Can the Dogear Arch give you what you need? EDIT: No, I guess not - it only clips at a 45 degree angle.
  18. I had no problem drawing a polyline and using Convert Polyline>Hole in Roof / Custom Ceiling:
  19. EDIT: Lew beat me to the punch, but here's a step by step guide, for what it's worth: Terrain objects lose their intelligence when you copy/paste them between plans. Here are my recommended steps: 1. Open both plan files. 2. Within the lot1 Modified plan, activate the Edit>Edit Area>Edit Area (All Floors) command: 3. Window around the terrain so everything you want to copy is included in the selection box, then Edit>Copy: 4. Within the Sharrock_New_Plan, Edit>Paste the terrain selection and plop it wherever you want: 5. Select the polyline object that represents the terrain perimeter - if you examine its properties you'll notice that it's no longer a Terrain Perimeter, but a Special Polyline: 6. With the Special Polyline selected, use this tool to convert it to a regular polyline: 7. With the polyline still selected, use the Convert Polyline tool to convert it back to a Terrain Perimeter: 8. You have now successfully imported the terrain into the house plan:
  20. Good tip. Perspective Floor Overview cameras have that setting, though Floor Cameras do not. Maybe your tip will give the OP a good alternative to using a Floor Camera.
  21. I assume you're referring to these attic walls: Just delete them and they're gone.
  22. This is because the Structure is defined with Floor Supplied by the Foundation Room Below. It's a Floor Camera - it won't display things that are on the foundation level.
  23. I suggest: 1) Cut the elevation regions and set Terrain Specification>Building Pad>Subfloor Height Above Terrain to manual, and enter a value that places the terrain where you want it, relative to the first floor/garage: 2) Now Paste Hold Position your elevation regions back in place and finish manipulating the terrain as required: In my opinion setting the terrain height manually makes subsequent manipulation easier and more predictable. That said, modifying terrain in Chief can be very frustrating.
  24. This is the only place I know of that you can set the Preview Pane display style: The only choices are Standard or Vector View. However, the Define Material dbx has the option to preview the material in PBR: