mtldesigns

I absolutely love this show. Been watching him for years now and have learned so much as well. You will learn a lot on every aspect of a build.

On the second floor originally, but then I tried the first to no avail. Yes there was a 4.5" gap (2x4 framed wall w drywall. I'll check out that help dialog inside the stair dbx and see what it says. Thx DB

Even though I drank an Nespresso, my brain is not figuring out why I can't get this wall to follow the stairs. Its a railing wall, height set at 42", so I'm not sure why it doesn't follow. I shouldn't have to use a ramp IMO. Regardless, the client ended up going with open railing to get some natural light in that stairwell, but in the future, this is possible, isn't it? Another question.. on the stairs dbx, the "railing" tab, what is "railing transitions and smooth transitions" used for? I picked both and don't see anything different. Just curious.

Never saw that before. Did you try rebooting?

@ChiefUserGLC I can accept that sir. And I appreciate the explanation too. Not going to down vote you... I am not perfect either!

To add on to what others have mentioned: You didn't say if this was all in one room, where as you could add platforms, or was there a corridor or rooms underneath these seats. I'll take the down vote, I don't care. But GLC you could have made your point wo this statement.

@ELMarshall What kind of dimensions are we talking? Wide and long or narrow and short? Is a sloped floor an option? You can always do "landings" per say too, but you'll need ramps to incorporated somehow too. Awesome though.. our church is having the same issue, not enough seats. And that's a great thing!

You can try to change the direction the light is coming from. Pick on that light, see if it's point straight down. Look at the Light data in that fixtures dbx, it should be pointing down (-90 degrees). See if that helps.

Not trying to be mean, but why do you need to the exact surface amount? Surely you don't order paint with this hard number as is, and not round up?

Is this a thing we report as a bug and how do we block or delete off the Chief

Just did... Thanks DB.

Hey DB, how do we do this? I thought the same as Steve, that there was a preference setting I could turn this off. This isn't a service issue or a bug, so just figured someone from Chief was on the clock to read all the threads and would have an idea. But I do agree, its probably to late in X16 to have an update just for this.

@Steve-C I totally agree with you and I said the same thing just a couple days ago. This thread has a small video to explain what we are talking about.

Cool. Thanks and it has a Chief option too...

You're welcome David. This looks great! Great job my friend.

This was an easy case where I can avoid all the "choices", since this isn't very detailed. But those areas in the Working Plan View where all the layers are on, and the area is very busy, I have to zoom way up on the object I want to center on, and still I am 50-50.

Hi Glenn, Please see the video. I don't want the angles alignments on, just horizontal and vertical. I don't know if this is a setting I can turn off. Recording 2024-10-06 213554.mp4

I am looking for a way to turn off the annoying "angled" selecting lines when I am lining up anything with another. I don't think I ever used this to align with anything at an angle, ever. On a large, busy job.. those dang lines like to grab everything. I believe these came with 16, since I don't recall them on earlier versions. Is there a way to just have it set to do horizontal or vertical alignments? The Knowledge Base is really no help at all on this, at least that I could couldn't find..

We have to do that sometimes. Yep.. another reason to go that way. Most people here went east when they left, I have no idea why. We rode it out at the house, since we were not in a surge area and about 9 miles off the coast. Lots of wind, about 8" of rain, had to drain the pool twice, lost power for most of a day, but not a lick of damage. One potted plant was knocked over was it. Thanking God again.

I believe I would have done it the other way.. Make the 5.5" part of the roof layer, and then delete and structure. The metal joist are the structure IMO, and you won't be building that in the Chief world. This would have left your roof planes as is and moved your attic walls up. However, I am glad I could help and it worked out. Daphne, AL, I didn't realize how close you were. Great. Now I have another place to run to if another Helene comes up into the Big Bend area.

Perspective Framing Overview, under the camera pull down. Make sure to build your framing or you wont get much.

CONT. The double upping of those members looks to be your issue. Looking at your attachment, focus on the framing view of that gable. See how your top of wall frame doesn't go all the way to the underside of that purlin? It needs too. Since your not doing a roof structure per say, delete that 5.5" and your wall will continue up, and hoping fix the soffit issue. BTW, I always build these gable walls outside the joist and post. This way my wall goes all the way to the bottom of those roof members, AND now its just basically a curtain wall. This helps the framers too, since they don't have to cut around those metal joist. My $0.02.

Got to love these.. I've done a couple this year already, got another new client wanting a 40 x 80. The good thing, no load bearing walls, :-) So what's going on Rob? Why do you have 5 1/2" located twice? You have 5 1/2" fir framing under the surface tab and then another 5 1/2" under the structure, both in the roof layer dbx.

Smart man... I'm amazed you found these drawings. Def would be a cool thing to think through.

See if this gets you in the right direction. 1098474939_XYZFLOORPLANX16 mtl.plan