Alaskan_Son

Is this a trick question? Are you just trying to start trouble? : ) I suppose a plan may or may not help in this situation, however it most certainly could not hurt. I'm actually not sure where I would start to troubleshoot that one. In that instance some screenshots might be a little more helpful.

There's really not much more to say... post the plan Its become somewhat of a pet peeve to me over the years. 9 out of 10 times we ask someone to post the plan, they ignore it. For those of you that do, if you're not sure how to post the plan, just ask. Its easy... -Save the plan -Close the plan -Zip the plan (right click>send to compressed folder) -Attach the plan to your post using "more reply options">Browse>Attach This File If the plan file is too big, save as a different name and then delete whatever isn't necessary from the plan and try the above steps one more time...OR use Dropbox When you post the plan, you will almost always get an accurate answer in very short order and save a lot of people a lot of guesses. Plus, when you ignore requests to post the plan its almost a little insulting. You're asking us to donate our time to help you, but you're not willing to play your part (at least that's how it can seem at times). After doing this for long enough, I think there are some who will simply stop helping. Please, if someone asks for it, post the plan, and if you know it will help, post it before being asked. Thanks.

You're welcome:) I'm a side note, not sure I mentioned it before, but you will almost always get a near immediate and accurate answer if you learn to post the plan.

You know...I must note that someone would have likely figured that out for you days ago had you POSTED THE PLAN. and if you don't know how, just ask.

5/8" drywall + 7/8" flooring = 1-1/2". Check the room structure dbx more carefully or... POST THE PLAN

No problem. Glad you figured it out

Or, perhaps...3D>Camera View Options>Toggle Textures

Perhaps you accidentally toggled your colors off. See attached...

No

Yup. Exactly where I was headed.

Are you talking about Standard 3-D previews or ray traces? Two entirely different animals.

Now that I think about it a little more I think one option adds the door PANEL to the library and the other adds the entire doorway (panel, casing, lintel, sill, hardware, etc.)

I actually don't remember. I'm not in front of my computer right now but if I remember correctly it gives you the option of door or doorway. Whatever it was, one worked for what I was doing the other didn't.

I have used that in the past for custom doors.

You know...I just remembered something I previously thought of doing that hasn't come up again since I thought of it... Using the subtraction tool for heavy timber framing (or actually any kind of complex joinery.. You could essentially make all your cuts in 3D, and then separate the pieces and make a sort of visual 3D cut list. That's all. Just thought I'd throw that into the mix while I was thinking about it.

Good catch Curt. I'm sure that wasn't helping then. I just automatically deleted those lights for my quick test as they didn't seem necessary so you might be right.

I thought that at first as well, I even put it in my post but deleted it when I realized that it looked like those light were actually under the cabinets (from renderings in previous posts), and some of the light leaks were on the walls and not even near the cabinets.

I didn't mess around with it too much, and there's a lot that could be done to make it look nicer, but here's a 4 pass, just under 5 minute ray trace using your settings and plan with the following changes... -I deleted most things from the plan that weren't in view (if you do this, save the temporary plan with a different name before you start deleting stuff) -Under the lighting tab in the ray trace dbx I pretty much always uncheck "Use Camera View Settings" -I moved the added lights to behind the camera and deleted or turned off all ther rest (including the sun). Please note, turning the sun off isn't always necessary (and proabably wasn't in this case), it just helps sometimes (at least in past versions to get rid of some of those "light leaks". -Probably most notably, I built a quick roof on the plan. Not sure if the probelm was the missing roof or something else...at any rate, its nothing fancy, but hope that helps.

You made no mention of having tried turning off the sun. Have you tried that yet?

I can't speak for everyone but we do a lot of custom cabinetry and getting the cabinets drawn correctly (interior and exterior) can be very important at times...especially in order to communicate and detail exactly what we're looking for to the cabinet shop.

You could just be creepy : )

Lisa, Can you attach the plan? If so, I think we could help you get things fixed rather quickly. I think what you need to do is set the height off the floor, or offset from ceiling dimensions correctly for your pucks. It can also help in these situations to check "show position in camers view" so you see where the actual light source is. If the light source is offset from the fixture it could be buried and you may not really notice it.

If you're gonna do that, why not just use 2 drawers without hardware and then add the handles manually??

I just got back to my computer. It actually isn't quite as complicated as that. What you can do is... 1. Build cabinet exactly like you want it but with no handles... 2. Copy/paste in place, change upper drawer to an opening, and add handle to lower drawer placing it where you want it... 3. Copy/paste in place the new cabinet, change lower drawer to an opening, and change upper opening back to a drawer placing handle where you want it. 4. I would defintely uncheck "included in schedule", and would supress label for the latter 2 cabinets. This method has its obvious flaws but would also allow for different handles on the upper and lower drawers. You can also use a door for the lower drawer and that gives you independent control over the handle placement as well as the panel and handle style. Only drawbacks are the opening indicator is wrong (which I don't use anyway) and the auto label is also incorrect (which I don't use either). Either way, its a bit clunky. Hopefully we'll get something a little more awesome in X7.

This price seems a little low to me for a such a huge amount of work. For an extremely large consultation fee and a moderately high markup I think I could find an exorbitantly high priced architect to get them finished up to the point you could hire Scott at a relatively low rate to clean the plans up and add a few crappy ray traces to sweeten the deal.