Richard_Morrison

This is also one the improvements listed for X12.

Are you making the CAD Block first? It won't work with just lines.

I have seen that Chief exports materials lists to BuilderTREND format, but I know nothing about it beyond that. Might be something to look into, though.

You can easily create new materials, and there are a number of videos on how to do this, e.g.

Roof and floor elevations would be optional information, as would utility information. (see: http://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2016-09/AIA-C201-2015-Free-Sample-Preview.pdf ) There are many levels of information possible in a survey, and it appears you have received a "basic" survey, which even includes information on adjacent property, and which is usually optional. So, while you may have been hoping for more, I don't see that the surveyor provided less than requested. On a flat lot such as this, since contour lines are usually at even foot intervals (and often at two, five, or ten-foot intervals), you might have one contour line max, which would be kind of silly.

Aha - see if you can delete two of them.

You can, and this is often what I do. You generally will have to recreate the model in AC, but tracing over a Chief-generated DWG is pretty fast.

FWIW, I think it is highly dependent on the specific project. Chief's automation can be a great timesaver, or it can be a major annoyance and a roadblock. For standard residential projects where you don't have split levels or unusual conditions, Chief is going to be much faster. When you get out of the mainstream, then the extra time that I seem to need to get every room to behave correctly in Chief would be better spent just doing the project in ArchiCAD without workarounds. There is much more that can be done with an ArchiCAD model in terms of extracting information, and the layouts are far more flexible. (Not to mention automatically coordinated annotation, renovation filters, etc.) As much as I like the many features of Chief, it irks me no end that after using Chief for twenty years, I still occasionally need to ask for help on getting models to behave. I have never needed to do that in ArchiCAD, even with very complicated and detailed models.

The first photo happened about 10 miles from here 30 years ago, along with many other homes. Probably built by a contractor with your same attitude. High winds can have a similar effect, as the second photo shows. The human race will survive poor building practices, but many individuals don't.

This is not really much different than the "stab and jab" approach that many contractors take with bolts placed after the concrete is poured, except that you couldn't really see if the bolts were fully embedded since the mudsill would block your view. Stab & jab is also a good recipe for a cone of laitance, which reduces the structural strength of the anchor bolts in pullout.

Do you know where mudsills are specified in the building code? That's right -- the FOUNDATION section. So, I'd have to say that at least a few people (and code-wise, should be everyone) consider mudsills to be part of the foundation.

This is what https://www.strongtie.com/anchorholders_anchorbolts/am_holder/p/anchormate is for. If there were a 2x6 or 3x6 mudsill in place prior to the pour, with a standard 8" foundation wall, you would be pouring concrete into a 2-1/2" slot, and make it harder for the concrete folks to trowel the top of the foundation wall.

Sadly, no. Only the view zoom is saved. If they included scale, they'd really have something.

Thanks, guys! Interestingly, I see now where you can ADD a revision to multiple pages, but only when you initially create it. If you try to edit the same revision later, you can only edit it for that one specific page. This seems odd to me that you can add a revision to a page range, but only edit/delete a revision later page-by-page, but I can deal with it for now. I guess this will go into suggestions.

I was hoping to propagate a specific revision description throughout the set in the revision schedule. This would be something like "Owner Review", "Initial Permit Set" or "Permit Revisions". However, this doesn't work for adding a revision on Layout Page 0. As far as I can tell, you have to modify each layout page's information one-by-one. Am I missing anything here?

In the example, I was looking for a symbol (in this case, a garden window with a generated 2D block, and a sink placed in a cabinet) which normally live with continuous lines, to have a dashed linetype for a demo plan. When a 2D SUB-symbol is embedded in a 3D object, there is no way to directly explode its 2D CAD block and change linetypes, without creating a whole new library part. For a demo plan, this would be overkill. In this case, Mick reminded me that I could just insert the 2D symbol BY ITSELF. As a standalone 2D block, you can change its linetype by placing it on a different layer, as long as "Linetype/Fill by Layer" is selected. Then, I just moved the newly placed dashed symbols over the continuous linetype symbols. It's a good tip, I think.

Yes, they do, if you select "By Block Layer" for Line/Fill style in the CAD Block Specification, rather than "By Object." This can be quite useful.

You have to explicitly set the program to use the Nvidia card, or it will revert to using the lame onboard video card, which is not likely enough to use with Chief.

Thank, Mick! Just changing the block to "By Layer" works. (If the layer has a dashed linetype.)

You mean kinda like this? (See especially post #3): http://www.chieftalk.com/showthread.php?26332-Foundations-below-grade Maybe, but I was hoping for something less of a workaround.

I am trying to change the garden window 2D block and the sink block to a dashed line type. They are both currently on a dashed layer. I can find no way to explode these or to put these on a "By Layer" setting. Any way to do this short of a View to CAD approach?

Scott, could you please fix the thread topic? Renee is a woman's name, which Rene clearly is not. This probably bugs me more than it does Rene.

Every project I've ever done in Los Altos has used the Planning Dept. definition for floor area, and I would certainly go in with that attitude. However, interpretations change, so there is seldom any certainty. Technically, the Code says that a "substantial improvement" (which would trigger the upgrade) is any addition that costs more than 50% of the "market value" of the existing structure. However, "market value" is pretty nebulous. Some building departments use 50% of floor area, but I've also had building departments use a depreciated value for the existing structure so that even a kitchen remodeling in a small, old house would trigger the upgrade. Welcome to the Bay Area.

Joe, This is a very nice format! However, you should be aware that you need to deal with Net Free Areas (NFA) of ventilation, not actual sizes of the units. It is seldom (never) that a 14" x 22" gable vent, say, will provide 2.13 SF of ventilation. The NFA is usually listed in the manufacturer's specs.

Not exactly true. ArchiCAD has a free 3rd party add-on to convert RFAs to ArchiCAD objects. From there, you could export in a variety of 3D formats.