conwaynorth1 Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Why Won't Mirrors Display In Elevation, Cross Section Views Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRAWZILLA Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Because sections are cuts so there is nothing to reflect. Camera views take into consideration the whole model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conwaynorth1 Posted February 15, 2016 Author Share Posted February 15, 2016 Understood, but why not wall elevation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis_Gavin Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 ou need a rendered view, not section or elevation, then are not renders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 6:51 PM, conwaynorth1 said: Understood, but why not wall elevation? Did you try a wall elevation using the standard rendering technique? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rlackore Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 A mirror will display in both section and elevation if the layer they are assigned to is active. They won't reflect anything - obviously - but they will display as linework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 7:29 PM, rlackore said: ...They won't reflect anything - obviously... Never tried it until just now, but I'm not sure why this is "obvious". Why wouldn't reflections display when using the standard rendering technique? It doesn't actually make a lot of sense to me. I can see maybe no reflections for items behind the camera, but why no reflections for peripheral objects? If for example I take a cross section view at an angle to the mirror, it really doesn't make sense why there would be no reflections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rlackore Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 On 2/15/2016 at 7:42 PM, Alaskan_Son said: Never tried it until just now, but I'm not sure why this is "obvious". Why wouldn't reflections display when using the standard rendering technique? It doesn't actually make a lot of sense to me. I can see maybe no reflections for items behind the camera, but why no reflections for peripheral objects? If for example I take a cross section view at an angle to the mirror, it really doesn't make sense why there would be no reflections. Until you posted your reply, I'd never viewed a wall elevation or cross-section in anything other than Vector. It had never occurred to me that the other rendering styles were available in an elevation or cross-section. So, I feel pretty stupid. But to your point - I suspect CA didn't implement reflections in an elevation or cross-section because they would be of little value (IMO). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaskan_Son Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Yeah, I think you're probably right. I do agree that there is very little value too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now