robdyck

This topic has been discussed in sveral posts, but I thought I'd share this recent render by Microsoft CoPilot: From this: To this:

A plan file maybe:)

Hey Lance, I'm not sure exactly why that's happengin, but I'll share my settings. I'm not experiecign that issue, although I am still getting 2 temporary dimensions even though it's set for only 1.

Awhile back I had made a feature request for an elevation line that would allow different heights at each end and with straight line interpolation along the line.

Hey Jim, I can't get anything to work with a shaped window.

To set elevation lines or points in an even ascending or descending grade, simply use the transform/replicate tool and include the z-axis elevations. It may be helpful to calculate the slope percentage before performing this task.

@Chrisb222That's pretty sneaky!

If the higher window is wider, I will place it on it's own layer so that I have line control. If this higher window cuts the wall's main layer (where there would still be some framing below), I will fill those areas in with CAD polylines with a lighter fill. I place these windows on their own layer because this provides line style control which is too limited if you use the vertical stacking option. Because we have more than just the plan view to convey the structure, I really don't worry too much about if it's perfectly clear at a glance. It's not too much to ask the plan's readers to look at every drawing in the plan set, and even to think a bit:) Here's a recent example:

There are 2 possible settings to adjust wall stud spacing: Automatic Framing Defaults>Wall Wall Type Definitions: adjust the framing layer to use the default setting for universal control from Automatic Framing Defaults or assign a stud spacing specific to that wall type. By default, in at least some of Chief's template plans, at least some exterior walls do NOT follow the Automatic Framing Defaults. In my opinion, a template plan should be set up so that exterior walls DO follow the Automatic Framing Defaults.

I'd suggest that you explore the Orthographic Full Overview camera, then select 3d>View Direction>Top View. This will display the pattern used for the material. To adjust the pattern lines, simply edit the material (if needed). Experiment with rendering styles and toggling color / shadows, etc.

First thing I'd try is unchecking 'Roof Over This Room' in the lower pop-out room. Second thing I'd do (if that doesn't work) is add that layer to the floor structure specification for the balcony.

This would require manual modelling as there are no soffit settings on a 'per wall' basis. You could either use multipl roof planes, or a single roof plane with manually modeled soffits.

I did a quick experiment. While my cad block lines were exactly drawn corner to corner, I got similar unexpected results at each corner for the relationship between the center of the line and the center of the muntin. Upon inspection, I can see that for these muntins, the cad lines represent the top edge of the muntin. So, I can adjust the cad lines to move to the top edge and re-load the muntin. First Try: 2nd Try:

First, try setting the camera Tilt Angle to 0 and then inspect both views. This will result in the least amount of variation between the 2 views. The difference in the backdrop postion is due to the Index of Refraction of the glass material. A different refraction value will also affect the appearance of the position of the backdrop.