robdyck

Members
  • Posts

    4904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1412 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Medicine Hat, Alberta
  • Interests
    Mountain Biking, not sitting

Recent Profile Visitors

15225 profile views
  1. More examples to add fuel to fiery conversation! Awhile back I used google street view to create a backdrop so I could illustrate a home in situ. This process was basic, but it prevented the homeowner from having to make changes to their home because the architectural control board was satisfied with the variation from adjacent homes. Today, I asked Gemini to improve it. Here's the original image I created in Chief: Here's my prompt and the result from Gemini (Nano Banana): In the attached image, I used a google street view to illustrate my project house ( the white house in the middle) in situ. I'd like you to improve this into a realistic scene by improving the landscaping and lighting. The architecture of all homes in the image cannot be changed. If you ask me, that's almost unbelievable! That took about 1 minute to prompt and generate. I agree with Chris on this one...if Chief needs to make improvements, they can focus on bringing speed and increased intelligent tools to help with tools related to con docs.
  2. No, I don't send any AI altered renderings...ever. They can do that themselves, right?
  3. I'm not sure Chief really needs a whole lot 'built-in' from a rendering standpoint...not while there are so many other options. D5 has some very interesting features like using AI to build out landscaping using the models and tools. The soft plan examples looked to be pretty heavily modeled prior to rendering enhancements and I find that creating landscapes is quite time consuming. Now, I can send basic renders to any client and they no longer need me to provide great renderings:(. Here's an example that CoPilot generated. My prompts were minimal. I can't do that in Chief in 2 minutes! And yes, it still changed parts of the building.
  4. Are you using Saved Plan Views?
  5. You need to divide the foundation into rooms that align with the different floor levels on the main floor. Without this separation, it will continually change. Alternatively, you can delete the foundation entirely...if you have no specific need for it. The Media Room is marked as Floor supplied...by below. Make this floor structure the same as all other rooms at floor elevation 0". The easiest way to divide the foundation into rooms is to select the dividing walls from the main floor and the copy-paste-in-place to the foundation level. The go back to the main floor and check all floor elevations and floor structure conditions. I have the blue highlighted rooms at 0". After doing the tasks I mentioned, the result works out as expected.
  6. If you can post the plan file or send me a download link, I'll take a look and see if I can help.
  7. Here's the problem: the small room divider walls that separate the wall types at the window wells. Delete this and it works correctly. Of course, you'll need to figure out another method to control those walls. rober-08-02-2026-08-24-21.mp4
  8. Here's the problem: the small room divider walls that separate the wall types at the window wells. Delete this and it works correctly. Of course, you'll need to figure out another method to control those walls.
  9. The gap is the rough opening...because your brick layer is checked as 'framing'. Open the wall definition and make sure that only the framing layers is checked as framing.
  10. No, that type of window is not available in X17.
  11. Try opening the room dialog and uncheck the default for the room Ceiling Finish.
  12. In the picture you've posted, the casing is illustrated backwards. The thin portion should be at the jamb. When reviewing casing molding profiles from the library, the molding profile must appear 'upside down' in the library browser in order for casing to not be installed backwards. I doubt there are many (any) casing manufacturers who illustrate their casing products with the thicker portion at the top, although the 'flat' portion may be at the right or the left. In Chief's library, there are many different orientations for casing profiles and the main variation from the expected results is in manufacturer content. And, if a person wanted to make a corrected version of the Brosco casing profiles, each molding profile would need to be placed and then oriented correctly (for Chief), and then added to the Library and renamed. Chief allows molding rotations of user library items, but not a reflection of the profile.