Alaskan_Son

Members
  • Posts

    11964
  • Joined

Everything posted by Alaskan_Son

  1. I agree, the first definitely looks better. It doesn't look like you quite compared apples to apples though. Your second picture doesn't have shadows and the ray trace/renderings don't appear to have the same settings.
  2. Nice work Jon. Looks good. You prolee realize this, but I'm relatively certain you can achieve the same thing all within CA by layering in Layout (no Photoshop necessary).
  3. Took a bit of time to see what was possible. Nothing fancy, but all done within Chief... The hardest part is dealing with dimensions. Without the need for dimensions its much easier.
  4. What you're really looking for if I understand you correctly is control over the box itself. I think this is something we could really make huge use of. Adjustable box panels (all the way to zero) would be immensely useful...both sides and back. Would solve a lot of problems we have with building custom units.
  5. I think Jon might be onto something. I thought the "®" or brand symbol (R with a circle around it in case you are seeing anything different on your end) was a pretty commonly used font. It works on both of my computers (Windows 7 and 8), works online, and with every program that I use, however in the screenshot you attached with the warning message there seems to be an extra character added that I didn't put there... Are you perhaps running on a Mac? I wonder if perhaps fonts don't work the same on Mac's?
  6. Hmmm...Not sure what going on Dennis. They just downloaded fine for me. And I'm just using the newest version of X7
  7. A few symbols we had to make for a bathroom remodel we're working on. Couldn't find them anywhere else so I had my son make them for me. I think they turned out pretty good... Material could be changed and could be used as a ceramic sink as well. Its a rectangular design that we've wanted for other jobs as well. Anyway, here they are if you can use them... Native Trails® Hana copper sink (with grid drain).calibz Native Trails® Hana copper sink (no drain).calibz Grid drain.calibz
  8. Sorry Bill, I wasn't aiming that last response at you. Jut pointing out that there are several possible methods to reach the desired outcome, however none really do the job quite right (at least not for the reasons the OP was after). For that matter one might as well just copy the plan and delete all the widows an doors...done.
  9. I think the challenge is to create a situation that leaves the plan correct AND keeps everything live.
  10. I have never needed to draw up RCP's for any of my jobs, and I'm sure others can chime in as to how they achieve what you're looking to do, however I messed around with it for a little while and it seems you can just about get what you're after by using the "Create Room Polyline" tool for every room in the plan then turning off the door, window, and wall layers until you get what you're looking for. It might at least get you a little closer.
  11. Not sure exactly WHY you want to do what you want to do, but you can sort of do what you're talking about by creating a orthographic top view and then using the cross section slider. Not very useful though in my opinion.
  12. What exactly are you referring to when you say "cut plane"? Are you talking about the height at which the plan view is generated? If so, you're right...the only way I know of to control what you're looking for is via layers.
  13. Actually, re-reading through your posts I'm not sure I originally understood what you were doing. If I understand correctly now what you're talking about I still imagine I would use ceiling planes, roof planes, and adjust these settings appropriately... Just my thoughts. I don't do a lot of plans with varying ceiling heights, but when I have, I've never done it the way you are. Maybe I'm doing it wrong though...
  14. I totally agree. It would be nice to be able to adjust the default settings of each room type, I was just suggesting that perhaps you wouldn't have to do that it your method was adjusted.
  15. In my humble opinion, I think you might want to rethink the way you are drawing your second floors. I would suggest that you only draw walls where there will actually be walls and do the roof portions strictly with roof and ceiling planes. As many people here will tell you, if you want your material lists to be accurate, it is absolutely imperative that your model is accurate. Unless you actually plan on building a floor and a very short wall to support your roof in the real world, you probably shouldn't model it that way either.
  16. Using the material painter in PLAN mode should change the material of every object in the entire plan that is using the material you are trying to change. Just be sure that "Blend colors with materials" is OFF. I personally put that tool into my top toolbar so I can keep a close eye on that sucker. It's NOT your friend...more like an enemy you need to cooperate and collaborate with once in a blue moon.
  17. You're more than welcome. Thank YOU for posting the plan. More often than not you will get an answer within a few minutes if you take the time to post the plan along with the description of your problem and some screenshots to make the issue as clear as possible. You done good : )
  18. Select the "doorway"/ railing section at the top of the stairs...you'll probably select the door first, hit tab so the wall is selected or just delete the door, open the wall dbx, and check "invivible". Essentially that section of railing needs to be changed to an invisible wall.
  19. By the way, THANK YOU for taking the time to attach the plan. Not something people take the time to do as often as they probably should. That's a very impressive house. Incredibly slow on my machine. I wonder of maybe the file size is causing some sort of overload on your system leading to the issue you're having...just a thought.
  20. All the stair openings look just fine when I open the plans...
  21. Can you possibly attach the plan? Its likely too big, so delete everything that is unnecessary (strip down the plan). Then save the stripped down plan with another name so you don't mess up your original, CLOSE the plan, and then attach it. If its still too big you can use Dropbox.
  22. I believe you are mixing up reputation points with warning points (which I don't even see anymore). Warning points (if they still exist) can only be given by the forum moderators. Negative reputation points as far as I know cannot get you kicked out. They are simply reflect a persons "reputation".
  23. More often than not there's a ton of guesswork and wasted time trying to figure out the problem before a solution is reached. With the plan (even a stripped down version as Perry suggested) you can usually get an answer super quickly and its no longer guesswork...Plus, we all learn something from it.