johnny

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2856

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by johnny

  1. johnny

    REVIT USER

    johnny replied to Triguy's topic in General Q & A

    Do you have an example of a typical project you might do? I've completed some nice homes with Chief just fine, but will admit the learning curve is fairly large on complex homes. There is a logic for Chief that takes some getting used to, but once you do Chief is the fastest "BIM" I've seen.
  2. johnny
    I would layer up 3D modelings and polysolids. If you have SSA there are some videos on this.
  3. johnny
    Keep in mind those point markets are what controls the manual (Pt-2Pt) dimensions. I personally make them much smaller by default, but leave them on since its the only visual indication that shows what the dimension extension is set to. There is no attachment of the (Pt-2-Pt) dimension to any other object.... You could really screw something up if you turn those off completely and make adjustments thinking those dimensions are still accurate.
  4. johnny
    The main body of the roof can be extended over to include a large portion of that upper terrace - thereby raising the main roof ridge line. However, in this plan the lower covered area is directly off the family room so there is a covered outdoor area for the plan. In the NW light is a great concern, which is why I even provided a small clerestory dormer over the terrace doors. My main point to the post was the render technique...the design was just a place-holder.
  5. johnny
    lol...its one of the new Tesla sedans. Thx btw.
  6. johnny
    Like this? ...and so everyone knows Glenn helped me with the terrain on this model. Thanks Glenn!
  7. johnny
    I really like that - nice!
  8. johnny
    Thanks for all the comments - but so you guys know, there are features in Photoshop that let you record your process so you bring an image in and run the sequence you already setup - so it takes a couple min. to apply to any new image. Granted, it may take a few hrs to setup. The effect above it now such that I can quickly implement it from Chief. Lumion has the same photoshop like filters (and save-ability) and that is something I am experimenting with in all this too. I've done some nice renderings just using Chief, but I was specifically looking for something that looks like traditional media.
  9. johnny
    As in all Chief?...no, its a Chief model with certain settings (yes watercolor etc) but post editing for the "effect".
  10. johnny
    I've been working on a way to do renderings that look more traditional even though they come from Chief.... Getting there but thought I would see what people thought.
  11. johnny
    There is a second position "handle" that allows you to simply grab the text and move/position where you want.
  12. johnny
    Joe hit the nail on the head - and i agree with Javatom in that you are WAY further away from completion than 1%.. Your floor plan and elevations (non-notated) means you are more like 5-10% complete and 90% incomplete from having permittable construction documents (CD). I believe Chief does the industry a disservice making people believe they can DIY for home design.
  13. johnny
    I use 30" Dell monitors - i've seen some try and use TV's for monitors and that isn't good for your eyes.
  14. johnny
    I guess we can't block lines with a terrain feature - which would be very handy to do with the setback lines drawn. Is there a work-around to get building setback lines to associate with a terrain feature?
  15. johnny
    Are you just using Chief for this work?
  16. johnny
    Unfortunately have not found any fast and efficient way to do this - so I make CAD details from view.
  17. johnny
    ...or you could just import a rug from the library and then reassign a texture (and map) to the rug symbol.
  18. johnny
    For my workflow I typically dont know exactly the page size/scale etc while I am working on the fundamental design elements of the plan. Therefore, having to make a layout file serves as a "view" portal does seem cumbersome. I do agree with you guys that this is something that should be handled in the plan file. I dont understand why this couldn't simply be accessed in the Project Browser. After all, Chief has stored this data when its sent to layout, as evidenced in the existing functionality - so it should be a simple addition to the app.
  19. johnny
    Chief's logic isn't the same as other apps. In Chief walls are a means to an end - and the end being a "Room". Rooms are "king" in Chief, and you need to think of walls as as merely the mechanism to create a room...and a room is where the main control exists. This took me some time to wrap my mind around, since you must consider ingenious methods that aren't intuitively obvious in order to model certain conditions. Your Parapet wall is trying to enclose the room since 9 times out of 10 that is what the user wants the wall to do. I have to admit, there are speed gains in this logic - but takes some getting used to. As for the railings - yes, that is a method that will get the visual you want - however the 1/2 wall would give you more correct framing models if that was important to you. You can manually set the height of a 1/2 wall, and a 1/2 wall won't automatically build to the roof plane.
  20. johnny
    I guess I was wondering if there was a way to do that inside the "plan" file alone...without the layout file.
  21. johnny
    If you really think about it, we currently send "Saved Views" to Layout. It can be a combination of Layersets, Annosets, floors, and floor ref into a saved view that is encapsulated on the layout page. However, apart from that one instance of the saved view there isn't anything that can be immediately accessed inside the actual .plan file to get to a view that contains all of the above settings. Is that true? I realize we can save an annoset that turns on a certain layerset, but we still have to select the correct floor and then turn on the ref display....or is there some faster way to do this?
  22. johnny
    What ive done for parapet walls is use 1/2 walls on the attic level. I then setup ceiling framing to act as the roof and then denote slope etc. 1/2 walls dont connect to the roofs, and you get a nice cap on the top of the wall if you want. Looking at your pic, you may want to make a custom wall that had siding on both sides of the parapet as well.
  23. johnny
    I gave you some love Michael. +1 However, this an interesting time to again make a point about Chief that is so unique. As the OP said, in Revit (like in Vectorworks) the tools you would use identify with the operation (more so). "Wrap Finishes" around an edge...a feature designed to affirmatively (that is the key word) complete the action that needs to be done.. In Chief, the solution is to manually edit the framing wall layer in a way that would allow Chief to automatically build the Sheatrock around the unfinished edge. That is a repeating scenario across many Chief's tools and operations.
  24. johnny
    I personally would try this method first, since there are some interesting advantages (moldings, better framing details, etc) if you can make that work. You could even use curved walls to give the edges a radius (if your seating allowed).
  25. johnny
    I think the difference is that you can't "explode" the objects while keeping sub-component integrity, but you can explode the surfaces. You should separate what you want in Sketchup and export/import your "objects" individually.