TheKitchenAbode

Members
  • Posts

    3070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheKitchenAbode

  1. Does the attached zipped file not open? Things were a bit slow. Will try again in a few hours, just on my tablet now. Thanks, Graham
  2. Hi Scott, I am only on my tablet right now but it looks as if there are no lights turned on in the bathroom or the direction angle is not correct or the watts are to low. From the other DBX shots the settings appear to be correct. What I will do is zip up my plan file and you can explore the lighting I setup. This is on my system at the studio so I will not be able to send it until tomorrow morning. When you run this I would be really interested in the time to render. Graham
  3. This is just a guess. The wall angles in the original plan have a lot of decimal places. Maybe there is a limit on what Chief can handle. The sections I played with have only full degree angles.
  4. Ok attached this time. Abode Curved Wall 15026.zip
  5. Here is the original plan with my section. Maybe some one can confirm.
  6. Don't know why, but I moved a section away and was able to join them properly. X7
  7. For me there are times when I am working on several concept plans for the same project. Will have a layout file and then relink depending upon what I need to send to the client. As you can imagine, things can get a bit mixed up now and then. Need a safety switch just to make sure the wrong thing does not automatically flow through. Graham
  8. Thanks Joe. For myself I would prefer to have a warning/option before things filter through. As Sherry mentioned, just an indicator as to which layout pages are out of sync with the associated plan would be ideal. I can the go in and make sure they are correct before updating.
  9. I know the plan view gets updated upon layout opening but on my layouts the elevations do not update. I must open the elevation and then it only updates when I close the elevation view. Is there a setting that I am missing? Graham
  10. I am in complete agreement with you. I was likely pointing out the obvious but thought it to be important to stress why shadows are such an important part of Architecture. This not only applies to design presentation drawings but also to the finished structure both exterior & interior. They must however be anticipated, used and controlled correctly to ensure they are working for you and not against you. Graham
  11. There's been some great demonstrations presented here on applying shadows to elevations. An important consideration as demonstrated by Scotts examples and his client feedback relates to how this effect can be perceived. Adding shadows or any other effect will alter focal points, visual weight and either emphasize or deemphasize particular characteristics of the structure. As with any artistic effect it must be used with a high degree of consideration to these visual impacts so as to ensure an improved design presentation. Graham
  12. I believe that the other formats are actually generated as images versus vector based elevations.
  13. Some separate freehand drawing (sketching) tools would be useful. There are times where it would be great to have the ability to markup proposals in a more casual manner, especially in the earlier design concept stages. As the OP mentions, to do this currently requires an auxiliary program to either make the sketches up and export/import them as say jpegs or exporting the Chief doc into the sketching program. Would save a lot of time if this could be done in just one program. Graham
  14. Scott had me intrigued with his comment/observation that with the room fill turned on then the material region CAD object could not be positioned between a fixture such as the toilet and the floor room fill. From what I can deduce it appears that the room fill object is treated similar to an Architectural Object and is therefore in the same Group as the toilet. On the other hand the material region is a CAD Object and as such it is a different group. Chief does not permit dissimilar objects to be moved (positioned) within any group other than it's own. When objects of dissimilar groups are superimposed you can only position one grouping in front of or behind the other grouping. in Scotts situation the solid white room fill & the toilet are considered to be in the same Group. A grid overlay derived by setting a fill in a Material Region or closed Polyline is a CAD Object and as such it can only be placed either in front of or behind the room fill & toilet Object Group. There is a way around this if one needs a solid colour background with a grid overlay. - Room fill "None". - Make Room Polyline, set fill to background colour. - Make Room Polyline, set fill to desired hatch. "Check" Transparent Pattern Background. You can now move the grid and solid background behind the toilet object grouping and everything will wrap properly. I used the Room Polyline instead of the Floor Material Regions as the Room Polyline is purely CAD based, no need to be concerned about changes to the floor in other views. Hope this helps, Graham
  15. Forgot to mention. - Open Object (material region) - Line Style - under Drawing Group check "Back Group"
  16. You can adjust the transparency of the fill if you are using X7.
  17. Agree Joe - would be great to have full control over every element of a cabinet, including the box construction. Would really like to be able to lock those internal sections so they would not constantly readjust every time I change something. Just making a simple cubby hole wine rack can be a real pain, when the client decides a larger cabinet with 2 more 5 x 5 cubbies are needed. Have to reset everyone one of then again including the separations. Not sure about your approach but I usually build stuff like this with individual cabinets and then block them. Graham
  18. Joe - was just demonstrating another way as you had already suggested the match front option. Have used this many times. Often however when I am just doing shelving units they area rarely based on 5/8" or 3/4" materials or traditional face framed construction. Need solid 2" - 4" look all around for a more modern/contemporary look. Plan, elevation & renderings must be correct. I am not aware of any other way to achieve this if I want to use the cabinet controls. Any suggestions? Graham
  19. Posted 13 May 2015 - 03:39 PM Would this do the job? This has all of the functions and properties of a wall cabinet. Just change front doors as usual. This was done by making the cabinet box material 100% transparency. Added left & right side panels 1/16" to make sides solid. Used molding applied top and bottom to make tops & bottom. Alternatively you can use the symbol offset origin to place a 5/8" or 3/4" panel flush inside the cabinet boundaries versus using a 1/16" panel applied on the outside. Also shelves can be used to create the top and bottom versus my molding technique. Graham Open Back Wall Cabinet.calibz
  20. Make the cabinet material 100% transparent and place side panels on it. You can use shelves to rebuild the top & bottom. I poste a model about a week ago on the same subject. Give it a try. Graham
  21. Had similar issue. As Michael indicates it appears to be related to older SKP models. Not sure about your version of Chief but for me this only happened when I changed to the 64 bit version. If I used my 32 bit version the same model would import properly. Graham
  22. Hi Mark, May have found the answer. Use a filler. You can change the front configuration the same as a regular cabinet. The advantage is that the box is truly invisible and as such the box lines do not show. Top & bottom can be built with my molding technique as can shelves. If sides are required use a side panel 1/16". Looks like every thing shows properly in all views and you have full control over the inset vertical widths. All dimensioning is correct and bumping & pushing works fine. Also makes a great backless cabinet. Give it a try, will just take a few minutes to get the knack of it. Graham
  23. Hi Mark, Obviously I did not understand your description. Sorry about that. I think the verticals may be controllable so as to get what you want but will need to play a bit more. Getting a solid handle on all these splitting controls & options takes a bit of time need to play around more. Graham
  24. Hi Mark, Would this work? - Framed Cabinet, Inset - Delete bottom separation (cabinet has no bottom now) - Moldings, CA-001 - Set molding height to your thickness (example 3/4") - Set molding width to cabinet depth (example 12) - From Bottom "On" - Horizontal Offset - cabinet width (example -12) You can now control the bottom separation thickness and it will show correctly. Use Vertical Offset to adjust vertical position within cabinet. Use width to adjust depth. Can create smaller shelves within cabinet. Other molding symbols or a custom one may provide more configurations. Graham