Alaskan_Son

I noticed that same thing. You just have to click on the little "Full Size" option in the lower left corner. I don't have the same problem on my iPhone though. Now on a side note, the Advanced Search seems to finally be working!!

I like this idea although I'm not sure whether the (-) should mean that the number has been rounded down or if it should perhaps mean that the real number is slightly smaller and has been rounded up. The latter makes more sense to me personally because that's how I notate that situation myself but I could adapt to either method. This is a very good idea though and I think you should post it as a suggestion.

Excellent sleuthing good sir, my hats off to you. Thanks. After testing it out and giving it some thought, I believe that you are correct. This behaviour should be considered a bug. I really have no problem with Chief rounding DISPLAYED values for the various fields as long as the actual values are maintained. The problem is that they don't seem to be maintaining these values throughout. There seems to be some data loss between the thickness field in the General tab and the wall definition. The funny thing is that if you change the Number Style to decimal inches before making your changes on the General tab that the values are calculated and carried though correctly.

Did my attached file not work for you?

You might consider trying that same approach here as well. I for one just skipped over this particular question because there's no way to give you an acurate answer without seeing a plan.

Just a side note, but you can fix the problem by adjusting your bottom margin to be zero or even a negative number. The required setting will depend on the height of your Rich Text. Give or take, the formula seems to be: (-(Text Height / 2)) + desired margin ...so, for 24" tall text with a 1" margin you want a bottom margin of -11" and for 2" tall text with a 1" margin you would want a bottom margin of 0".

That appears to be a problem specific to the Chief Blueprint Font. Nice catch. Please report it to tech support. Strangely enough, that same Chief Blueprint font acts just fine in X8.

I don't have any CAD details for it in Chief but we have worked with the REMOTE wall system. It shouldn't be too difficult for you to draw up your own details. The real key is just careful planning and detailing to keep that exterior membrane and insulation CONTINUOUS for the entire envelope...bottom of foundation and wrapping up all the way over the ceiling...that and careful air sealing. Additionally, you'll want to give careful thought to window and door placement along exterior walls to allow for the extra thickness of the foam, furring strips, siding, trim, etc. Not every design can be converted to the REMOTE wall system for this reason. Also give careful thought to window and door placement within the wall assembly. The REMOTE wall system will require some unique window details. If you're in a cold climate I would personally encourage you to keep your windows further toward the interior of the building in order to keep them warmer and therefore reduce any possible condensation problems. Anyway, I know that wasn't exactly your question but I thought I'd throw a few tips out there. EDIT: After giving this a little more thought it occurred to me that if you're going to utilize the system, you're really probably going to want (if not need) to draw up most of your own CAD details anyway. The details can vary greatly from one house to the next depending on foundation type, exterior attachments, roof type, exterior framed wall thickness, sheathing thickness, exterior membrane type, exterior insulation type and thickness, window bucking details, siding type and thickness, furring strip type and thickness (if any), etc. There are really just a lot of variables.

Unless you specify otherwise, Chief automatically connects "Island Rooms" using an invisible wall in order to provide for a more stable model (just something needed internally). You can turn the invisible wall layer off, or simply place that wall on it's own layer and turn THAT layer off. You can also optionally navigate to Edit>Default Settings>Walls>General Wall>Automatic Walls and Uncheck Connect Island Rooms but I wouldn't recommend that unless you plan to draw your own connecting wall. You might be fine, but I think you may find that you end up with unexpected results.

What might I ask is a "Certified CA"?

Open up your wall definition and re-enter the width for the wall's main layer. Not sure how it happened, but one way or another the width or your main layer was set to 3 63/128" (3.49"). You can't tell by looking at the dbx because Chief automatically displays those numbers to the nearest 1/64". Change the Number Style to Decimal Inches and you'll see what I mean...

You just need to create additional layer sets and use those for the different cameras. This is extremely easy to do and there are a handful of ways to go about it. Give it a try and see if you can work it out.

Hey Michael, Not sure which program was used to create these drawings and I haven't used AutoCAD in nearly 20 years but I downloaded your drawing into DraftSight and those lines were drawn using something DraftSight calls "Rich Lines" which are essentially just double lines. I exploded them into normal lines so that they could be imported into Chief. Not sure what exactly the problem is, but apparently Chief doesn't know what to do with the "Rich Lines". Actually, I couldn't change the color or line style of those "Rich Lines" in DraftSight either. They must have been drawn using a unique tool in the original program that the other programs just don't know how to handle. Anyway, I'm not very familiar with any of it, but hopefully this will work for you... West Wing 2nd Floor 2017.dwg

You are very welcome.

I'm sorry, I thought I mentioned it in the video but maybe I didn't… you need to set the appropriate stretch plane(s) or zone(s) in the symbol's sizing tab.

You're more than welcome. If I can find enough spare time I'll see if I can make another video going over my preferred method at some point here...using moldings and distributed objects. That method is probably quicker, easier, and more accurate except that it requires a little extra work on the front end to create the molding(s), symbols for end caps/arm rests, and symbols for any intermediate components (legs, frames, rails, book slots, etc.). Just a bit of extra effort for something I don't actually need to make right now.

Auto Rebuild Roofs isn't toggled on...

One more thing. It's also important to make sure we're speaking the same language and comparing apples to apples... Did you move your User_Library.calibz file, did you move your Database Libraries folder, or did you move your Chief Architect Premier X9 Data folder? The latter most certainly DOES have a file path setting in preferences. And note that the 3 items I just mentioned aren't all the files Chief needs in order to run properly either, there are plenty more libraries, data folders, and program files to consider that could also potentially be placed elsewhere...

Just to reiterate and expand upon what some of the guys above have said... It's nowhere near as simple as whether or not to store things in the cloud. There are a LOT of things that come into play and I suspect this is the reason Chief recommends against it. It's not because it can't be made to work, it's because it can be tricky to set up and maintain if you don't know what you're doing. Here are just a few of the issues you need to consider... Knowing which cloud service you're using and how it works...Are you syncing files or just using it as remote storage? If syncing, are you manually syncing files or are they being synced automatically? If they're being synced automatically, WHEN are they being synced? And are you accessing files directly from the cloud or from a synced folder? As has already been mentioned, it is well worth noting that there are very few situations where files can be simultaneously accessed by 2 different programs and with Chief I don't believe it is possible AT ALL. Knowing your correct file paths and setting them up correctly in Chief Architect Preferences... It is especially worth noting that you CANNOT change ANYTHING in the file path. You can't move your Dropbox folder to a different location, you can't rename it, and you can't do any of the above with any of the associated sub-folders that Chief needs to access either. You cannot change ANYTHING about the file path to the necessary folders that Chief needs access to unless you also go back in and change the path in preferences. How stable your internet connection and cloud server is...If you're accessing the cloud directly instead of accessing synced folders, the smallest connectivity issues can mean the difference between working and not working. Anyway, I'm sure there can be even more to it than that even but my point is that it can get complicated pretty quickly and it's not so much that it can't be done but that you really have to know what you're doing and you have to be careful doing it.

On second thought, here's another idea that might be of interest to you. I think this is a decent video probably worth watching for just about anyone using Chief pretty heavily for 3D modeling. The basic methodology can be used for quite a few things...

I think the answer to your question depends more specifically on the design of the pew. Site unseen I'm guessing the best option is probably to use a molding polyline as Eric suggested except with both 2D and 3D moldings and maybe a distributed object polyline to help provide for the two ends of each section. NOTE: You could also skip the 3D molding symbols by using multiple distributed object polylines. For example, you may be able to use a simple molding extrusion for the seat portion, a matching distributed object polyline to supply the 2 end caps, and then another matching distributed object polyline to supply intermediate components. This way you could simply copy those 3 objects and paste elsewhere to create a new resized and reshaped pews. This method would make it very easy to create all sorts of varying shapes and sizes and the distributed object polylines could be exploded to allow for further customizations.

With all due respect, they told you they don't recommend it. It seems like perhaps you should be accepting the responsibility for doing something they recommended against. It's not their fault. Also, FWIW, not everyone who moves their libraries to the cloud has these problems either. Some people have done so without issue. I don't know what it is that you have done differently but if some people are doing it and it works for them.

Hey Mike, The text style you are using has to be set to be controlled BY LAYER. See if this helps...

This setting will do that for you...

No, I meant what I said and I said what I meant. I was actually referring to the Drawing Scale found in the Drawing Sheet Setup. There are very few situations where you should be setting you Drawing Scale to anything other than 1 to 1. That scale setting is telling Chief how to translate your layout to paper (or PDF). For the VAST majority of situations you want 1" of layout "paper space" to print at 1" on your paper. The scale you send from plan to layout is an entirely different subject. You need to scale that down so that it will fit on the page. Here is an example of Chief's OOB imperial layout on 24" x 36" paper with a 1in. = 1in. Drawing Scale... Now here's an example of the exact same layout with a 1/4in. = 1in. Drawing Scale... Again, the only reason that comes to mind for changing that setting away from 1 = 1 would be in order to print on smaller paper than you had originally planned for. For example, maybe you drew things up to print on 22x34 and then decided to print on 11x17 (or visa versa). It's a way of preserving an accurate scale for a different paper size. And BTW, the reason I had guessed it was a drawing scale issue is because of this statement... "I am saving it as a 24"x36" in 1/4'=1'0" but it is not working."