Alaskan_Son

Mark is absolutely right. And in addition to those 2 general tricks you can also further manipulate your resulting symbols by using the aforementioned methods again. Here are a few videos I've made that go over how to tweak symbols for various purposes.

Alan, Try using the Ceiling Finish and see if that works for you. From the top down you'll need a very large air gap layer, and additional framing layer, and then lastly...an actual ceiling finish material.

This gets so stinking annoying. I've concocted and utilized probably a dozen different room naming and numbering systems but due to a major lack of necessary controls and a crapload of inconsistencies, every single one of them falls short in some area and only works for one or 2 scenarios and only under the perfect conditions... One method we're stuck using the "R" prefix with no way of displaying only the schedule number in a callout Another method we can display a modified schedule number in the room label but not in the schedule Another method we can display the room name in one layer set and a sort of callout with a modified schedule number in another layer set but only if we want them in the exact same location in the room...and the room name will be blank in the schedule...and again we can't have a matching schedule number in the schedule. Another method will allow for just about everything we want but it requires manually placing a bajillion different macros and will only work for up to 19 rooms per floor...and the schedule becomes ridiculously slow to work with. Another method is super simple to work with and allows for a custom schedule number in both the room label and in the room schedule, but doesn't allow for the callout, can't be used in a Rich Text box, and again...is limited to 19 rooms per floor. Another method will get us just about everything, doesn't have the 19 room limit, doesn't have a slow schedule, but requires a customized font if we want a matching schedule number in the room schedule. ...and those are just the methods I'm remembering off the top of my head for the purposes of this rant. The simple fact is that we have no direct control over the schedule number prefix, we have no built in global macro for the schedule number, we have no built in global macro for the room type name, we have no column in the schedule for the room type name, schedules only properly recognize the first 20 macros used in them and only recognize the schedule as the owner instead of the room, schedules won't display any macros used in the default room label, any macros used in the default room label are always appended to the room name, we have no way of modifying any of the values displayed using Chief's default global variables, we have almost no control over any values if we want to use Rich Text room labels, the list goes on and on and on. Sometimes I seriously think about giving up on Chief. I feel like we keep getting tossed little dog treats one by one, a couple a year, and only when we beg for them repeatedly. It just gets really frustrating.

See if these might work for you Alan... I'm away from the office now but just give me a call and I'll see if I can tell you over the phone how to tweak them so that they start counting at 100.

Here's another trick for your bag of tricks... First find a material you like or modify one so that it suits your needs and then apply it to your flooring. Here's one that I modified from one of the bonus catalogs just for this example... Limestone.calibz Then go through the following steps: 1. Create an Orthographic Floor Overview... 2. 3D>View Direction>Top View 3. Create a CAD Detail From View 4. Draw a closed polyline by snapping to the desired tiles... 5. Cut/Paste Hold Position into your normal plan view, Convert to Material Region, and set the Material Region to use the aforementioned material... 6. Go back into your 3D view and change the rest of your flooring material to wood... Not the best example because this particular material isn't the greatest but you get the idea. I'm not saying this method is the best but it has its place for sure...especially if you don't want to deal with all the extra objects and the increased face count.

I'm away from my computer now so I can't double check to see if there was some other setting that needs to be set a certain way. I don't think there is though. Only thing I can think of is to make sure auto rebuild foundations is turned on and to make sure you have an enclosed room. I don't think that setting I pointed out was designed for this particular use (I believe it was designed to add walls and footings under interior partitions) but I have made it work for the situations mentioned in this thread. I'll have to check when I get back to the office to see if there's something else that needed to be done. On a side note, I personally don't shy away from turning off auto foundations either. I typically do as Perry does also and just draw any oddball foundation stuff manually. Chief never seems to be able to get foundations exactly like I want to them without making some manual modifications. I was just trying to offer a possible solution for those of you who don't want to turn off auto foundations.

All you should need to do is check this...

You cannot use a block for a symbol if that block contains another nested block.

You can do that with Ruby and Text Macros.

You bet. Thanks for the donation. Hope you have a great rest of your weekend.

I wrote that to be placed into the actual slab label. If you want to use a text box with a leader line you'll need to change the context from Owner to Referenced or use this one instead. It can be used for either context... rgw perimter.json

Not sure. What object type are you using it for? And are you placing it into a label or into a text box?

Here you go... rgw perimter.json Just download and import this macro via Text Macro Management and then place your new %rgw_perimter% macro into your label. It was written and tested relatively quickly but I think it should do the trick. If you find it valuable enough to you maybe consider sending a donation my way by simply clicking on the PayPal link down in my signature.

Like this?

This is SORT OF possible but it would require a highly customized font and one or more custom text macros and you would be very limited with regard to vertical spacing. I don't think it would be any kind of worth it.

That would require a custom macro. EXACTLY what format and rounding are you looking for?

Try check Use Global Symbol mapping. You may end up wanting to create a unique material with that setting though for just your drawer fronts.

Here's what I personally do FWIW... I typically check the appliance specs and set up the cabinet and opening(s) accordingly. Then I place the properly sized appliance manually. I just personally find that placing the appliance via the cabinet DBX to be less accurate and far more error prone.

In X7, the bump map settings are on the Properties tab.

What version are you using?

There are so many options out there in this regard that its getting ridiculous. The one piece of advice I would give is this... Whatever you choose to use whether it be Dropbox (which is a lot more than just a cloud storage solution now), Zoom, Skype, etc. etc....As much as humanly possible, try to just stick with using ONE of those mediums for your collaboration. In my experience, one of the single biggest breakdowns in communications that can occur with things like this is when different parties are communicating though different channels and completely missing what has been communicated elsewhere. In other words, make sure everyone is on board with using the same tool and sharing information/giving feedback in the same place. It can prove to be an astronomical waste of time and energy if even one person in the chain misses the boat because they were trying to communicate over here when everyone else was having a different conversation over there.

You need to close the file before you zip it. Also...to get the file size down, consider delete any unnecessary objects from the file and doing a save as of the trimmed down plan file.

All you should need to do is drag those 4 little short walls through so that the join into the exterior walls. Eric and Chopsaw's solutions are both good as well. Really just depends on works works best for you and for the individual situation.

No...we are talking about the same thing. I just may not have described it properly I guess. I was saying almost the exact same thing you just said in your last post. When I said that the 3D plants used images with transparent backgrounds, I was really just referring to the material definition same as you. Instead of deleting the texture file though I was suggesting to change the material altogether and I also added the idea of possibly making the material semi-transparent. I do like your idea of just deleting the texture file though. That's a pretty quick method.

Most of those 3D plants use images with transparent backgrounds. Just change the material to a solid color and see if that works for you (with or without transparency).