-
Posts
518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Adam_Gibson
-
I've used the hot key but never got used to it. Much prefer the new method.
-
Got it. Thanks for the compliment.
-
Thanks Larry. What's OT?
-
I haven't used the new line features yet, but I look forward to it. I just noticed another thing that's cool. I like to render using the watercolor tool. I've lessened my use of photorealistic raytraces in order to provide a more abstract look for clients, but many of the manufacturer's stone textures take forever to render. Not anymore! It flies through it. I don't even have time to write this post. Still waiting for a cabinet lift-door. Maybe someday. . . .
-
There are some major improvements in this release. So far, my favorite is the Active Layer Display Options window. Holy moly, what a time saver! Since it's always open (in my case on a second monitor), anything I select in my plan is automatically selected in the layer window. It makes displaying and changing objects and their attributes a snap! There are other great features that I'm sure we'll all proclaim. Having said that, my opinion of this release is that it's an improvement for our workflow, but not a milestone (stairs anyone?). They can't all be huge releases though, and I welcome this one. My 2¢.
-
I hope it helps!
-
I edited my previous posts to reflect the correct font.
-
I do use text blocks in my layouts. Quite large ones. No problems that I can see. I was mistaken about the Window's font. It is actually blueprintdbt.
-
That is interesting. I've never had a problem with my font. I just opened an older layout and elevation in which I used Window's Blueprintdbt with lots of text. No issues.
-
From the album: Icons
-
If this helps, I do this every time a new version comes out and never have issues. Change every text default on the profile plan to Window's (if you use a PC) "Blueprintdbt." It never changes. I don't use Chief's fonts for that very reason.
-
Unfortunately, I believe you will have to explode it and resize each piece manually.
-
I think I just answered myself. Here it is. http://www.chiefarchitect.com/whats-new/
-
Where would one find these? Inquiring minds want to know!
-
Yeah. Forgot about her!
-
By the way, the fish died during the photo shoot.
-
Thanks Curt. All this to say that I actually own a genuine Saarinen table purchased from Knoll (see pic). I started this thread with the hopes that the edge profile would be out there somewhere. In fact, it's not even on the patent application. I can trace it myself, and will. It wasn't laziness, but the desire to get the true profile from Knoll as the wires on a contour duplication gauge are of sufficient thickness disallow precision, especially with the subtle top bullnose radius.
-
Wow Curt. Thanks!
-
I will post! Thanks!
-
Alan, to answer your question: yes. I am trying to copy an iconic, but hopefully not copyrighted, design. I don't believe one can copyright an edge profile. I am designing an oblong table that I'd like to precisely mimic the Saarinen's edge profile. I appreciate the feedback. I think I'll just use a contour duplication gauge, aka the ole trim-cheater, and rely on my field measurements. I'll post the profile here in the unlikely event that anyone wants it.
-
I didn't frame my question correctly. I'm not asking how to do it. I know how to make a molding/edge detail. I'm asking if anyone out there has the actual detail/dimensions for this iconic table edge. It's so cool and I don't want to bastardize it. I can't order one from Knoll because the one I need is oblong, so I'll have to have it made. It must be highly protected; I can't find the specs anywhere!
-
The question isn't how to draw an edge profile. I'm trying to exactly duplicate this design. And perhaps it's an intellectual trade secret but I can't find the copy of that profile anywhere!
-
Does anyone happen to have this? I'm doing a detail for a table, and can't find it on any CAD sites. It's the famous Tulip Table. Very cool profile as the table looks like it's less than a half inch thick but in reality it's more like 1.25 inches.