kMoquin Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 I have a molding polyline of a shingle flare. The shingle hatch is one I made and have been using for years. It appears fine in standard and vector view on the orthogonal portions. On the curved part of the flare the hatch disappears only in vector elevation views. Hatch pattern shows in vector 3D views. Anyone else experience this before? BTW - I'm also submitting this to support. Shingle Flare Hatch Issue.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgardner Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 8 minutes ago, solver said: Molding profiles should be closed, except for an exception or two. Learning something new here.... So Eric you are saying instead of having a radius for that molding if it is faceted then it will show correctly??? Have you seen a limitation if setting high levels of facets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robdyck Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 Still seems weird that you need a 90 rotated material for the shingle flare, doesn't it? Even with Global Mapping turned on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robdyck Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 An even when a rotated copy of the material is used, it doesn't align with the original material. Not the pattern or texture, not x or y. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DzinEye Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 2 hours ago, kMoquin said: On the curved part of the flare the hatch disappears only in vector elevation views. Hatch pattern shows in vector 3D views. Kevin, are you saying that this wasn't a problem in Chief versions prior to X12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kMoquin Posted April 3, 2020 Author Share Posted April 3, 2020 17 hours ago, solver said: Molding profiles should be closed, except for an exception or two. This fixed it. Thank you Solver! You are a genius. I did have this problem before X-12, but ignored it then. Also, to retain the curve the CAD curve needed to be converted to a polyline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kMoquin Posted April 3, 2020 Author Share Posted April 3, 2020 Now that's better. Thanks for the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now