tundra_dweller

This song actually lives in my liked music playlist after this original post was made, it's pretty groovy. Thanks Gawdzira!

And I'm not sure how well it would work to create a copy of that layer for your new slab areas, it's a system layer and I'm not sure how the software would handle it, I'm guessing not very well. Maybe the slab pour number would have some effect on how it works too. I'm curious to see how it works for you.

Select your slab edge and take a look at the "Slabs" layer color.

You nailed it, thank you! We have a cat that likes to jump up on my desk and walk on my keyboard when I'm working. I'm blaming it on him.

Every so often I have a plan I'm working on where seemingly out of the blue when I go to move cabinets or fixtures around they will no longer bump up against walls or other cabinets/fixtures, they can be moved right through walls or each other. It's kind of annoying and I know there must be something I'm doing that causes this to happen. I'm not going to take the time to post the plan, just hoping someone out there might have some insight.

Makes sense, I'm going to try live PBR views again and see how it goes. I've been spending way too much time updating images after changes, and those kind of views are the type that seem to generate more changes from clients.

I haven't come across that request yet, but someone like these guys might be a good place to start. https://www.range-systems.com/home-range/

I always do current screen as image for PC performance reasons, plus I try to keep the number of different cameras I have set up to a minimum. That being said I haven't tried live PBR views in layout for awhile, I'm curious to hear what others are doing as well.

This is one of those common instances where it would be really nice if we could take over control of footings (and wall intersections in general) similar to auto-built then manually adjusted roof planes. Sometimes the edit wall layer intersection tool doesn't get the job done, then you have to resort to CAD mask polylines or manual slabs/solids with different line style and fill properties to get the job done for 2D presentation. Which is probably what I would do in this situation, a combination of slabs and CAD lines/CAD masks, depending on what you need for 2D & 3D presentation. Do not overlook the power of the white (or whatever color works for your situation) line with a higher line weight value than the line you're covering. Not ideal but it works.

Michael, I think selecting for "Global Symbol Mapping" in the material definition pattern tab will get you there. Otherwise you can create a copy of the material by changing the scoping of the adjust material definition tool to anything but "Plan" mode and you should get a prompt to create a copy of the material that you can then adjust independently of the original material.

@ElkRivers There are extra attic walls at the 2nd floor and also at the attic level that can be deleted and fixes the overhang problem.

Another option would be to add your door to the wall, then select for retain wall framing in that wall's dbx, then remove the door. You'd have to manually add a piece of bottom plate and a stud or two in the opening if you really wanted your temporary framing to be accurate. But typically it's just a comment on the plan as Jason said.

Nice work, thanks! This isn't required in my area but it's a good tool to have in the box for sure.

I did a plan last year for a grain bin converted to an ADU, can confirm the walls of a circular structure have to be at least two separate wall segments. And the walls will want to break and the ends jump around the perimeter if you add openings and interior walls.