tundra_dweller

At 52.50 yrs I still feel like a rookie just about every day. Keeps things interesting!

It might have to do with your dimension rounding method / grid snap settings.

Nice...did not know this existed.

@Michael_Gia Just out of curiosity are you using X17 in project management mode or legacy mode?

This and ceiling break lines are a good case for some kind of tool-tip layer/setting. I don't know how realistic that is but could save some confusion for newer users.

Been there. If you don't know they're coming from arcs it's hard to find the setting to turn them off.

Default Settings > CAD > General CAD

I assume since the line vs box setting is in general defaults now that it's a plan-wide setting versus by floor as in previous versions. By the view would be optimal. I haven't messed with it in X17 other than try to figure out where the setting went.

Yeah I was able to kind of fix it by drawing a wall off to the side the length from the end of the railing to the peak of the ceiling plane. Then changed the new little wall section to "Roof Cuts Wall at Bottom", then center on the 2x4 wall. But as Rob said it's extremely unstable with the ceiling plane wanting to snap to places you don't want it to, etc.,.Plus I still ended up with missing drywall at the railing-wall intersection. I've learned it's usually way quicker to build a solid and move on in these situations. I wish I had all the time back I've spent chasing wall-ceiling-roof intersections around and fixing gaps in materials in Chief.

Thanks! I must have looked right past it.

Does anyone know where the framing display option for plan view (line vs. box) went in X17? The help file says the setting is in automatic framing defaults, but I can't find it there or anywhere else.

My arrow keys are set to move a selected object one click of whatever my grid settings are, or if nothing is selected they will pan the screen view. I think this is the OOTB setting as I don't think I ever changed it. I like my grid set at 1/2" and I mostly use temp or actual dimensions for bulk adjustments. I have two side buttons on my programmable mouse set for moving up or down floors. For view navigation I mostly use my spacemouse and mouse zoom wheel. This works well for me but I imagine these preferences vary a ton between users.

Or possibly a non-invisible wall that is on a wall layer that's turned off. I would start by turning on any wall layers that are currently off in that camera view, or just change the layer set to all-on temporarily. Looks like they are using X17 so the extra newel should be able to be moved or deleted.

I agree with everything Shane said, but if you want to recreate the window as spec'd by the supplier: 1. Change the frame size on your two windows to 35.5 x 61.5. 2. Using your temp dimensions (if set to pick up opening "sides") or some other method to set a 1/2" space between your two window frames. 3. Mull the two windows. 4. Open the mulled unit and make sure your rough opening settings are at 1/2" total width clearance and 1/2" total height clearance. It shouldn't matter whether you use the "Additional Space" or "Clearance Gap" method in the rough opening setting, just that the overall clearances are correct. Note: Your mulled units will not take on the rough opening settings from the windows you are mulling, for me they only seem to come in with a 1" clearance gap for width & height. If there's a default setting to change the R.O. setting for mulled units, I'm not finding it.

This has been my experience as well, can be frustrating.