Larry_Sweeney

Does anyone have or know of a seamless flagstone texture for use on a patio? I've been doing searches, but as of yet I've turned up nothing. I was thinking there was something on the 3-Diva site. I use to go there all the time, but I tried to go there yesterday and all kinds of S#$% came up on my screen and I didn't even get to the site. Some type of virus. Scared the crap out of me. I'm no computer gugu. Luckily my son-in-law was here (my computer gugu) and straightened things out. I highly recommend not going to that site anymore. I also thought there was something on the "old Chieftalk", but I don't know how to get on that anymore.

Mark.........The gargoyle came from Google Wharehouse. It was close enough to what the customer had purchased to use in the design. That section is still a work in progress. The actual gargoyle weighs 900lbs. It's solid concrete. I told the customer to get one formed out of dense foam, (He thought I was joking!) The cost of building the structure to sit it on would be W-A-Y less expensive. Structurally it's a real PITA! I'll need an engineers stamp for sure.

Curt.......this would definitely have been easier, but in plan view I wanted to show an actual wall. Now the next thing will be installing a cap on top like I want. I'm going to try and use a roof, shadow boards and freize to get what I'm after. This is the profile I'm after. I'm hoping to be able to use the roof rather than a 3D molding p-line. I have a feeling using a p-line will be a real pain. If it the "roof" idea works I'll show it on this thread.

Ginkgohouse......That worked! Ginkgohouse and to all............Thank you for your time and comments------much appreciated. Have a great day P.S. Ginkgohouse---Do you have a name?

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49042923/BERLIN%20REAR%20ADDITION%20PROJECT.zip How does that saying go. If you don't succeed TRY, TRY AGAIN!! I'm not sure what I did wrong the last time, but if this doesn't work I'm going for a walk. Maybe it's best if I go back to bed and start this day all over again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49042923/BERLIN%20PROJECT%2006292015.zip Sorry about that..............Like I said earlier, my mind is in "brain fart" mode.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49042923/BERLIN%20PROJECT%2006292015.zip Scott.......No it's not a railing wall. To eliminate aggravation, here's the link to the plan in Dropbox, which is still in an early phase of the design process

Ginkgohouse.......Looks great, but I'm having a "brain fart". For what ever reason my roof won't cut the wall. Do you or anyone have any ideas to what I'm doing or not doing that is keeping the roof from cutting the wall or do you need to see the plan? I'll have to show it through Dropbox if that's the case. Thanks for taking the time.

Bill........Thankyou---seems like a good work around. I'm not sure how often this problem comes up, but as CA's Deedeeu said, "it would make a great feature request". I try your idea and see if I run into any problems and follow up on this thread later. Have a great day.

I would like to curve the top of a exterior railing wall (attachment), and I'm getting a sore spot on my head from all the scratching. I've been unable to find any info on this so far. Is this possible to do with walls in CA? Of course I could make it out of a p-solid, but would prefer using a wall if possible. If this can be done can anyone point me in the right direction for the info or instruct me on the procedure? As always all advice is greatly appreciated.

Perry........Thanks, that was the ticket! So, does this work the same on an interior door if you have different size casing on each side of the door? It goes by the largest casing rather that the size of the casing nearest to the inside corner?

I don't know if I'm having a "brain fart" or what, but I can't get this door to move any closer to the corner. I have "Ignore Casing for Opening Resize" checked in Plan Defaults. Without submitting the plan, doe anyone have an idea what's going on? As always, all advice is greatly appreciated.

Bill.............Thanks-----now it's time to "play"!

Can an eyebrow dormer be built using CA so the ridge of the dormer pitches up the roof rather than being level? If this can be done can anyone steer me in the correct direction. Thank you.

When you select/tab the individual windows of the mulled they do not have the "sill or casing" selection available.

NOTE.............The second and third attachments should be reversed. Joe..... "you might need to select/tab to each of the components and set the "Sill" there." Are you meaning by this statement that I should do this before I mull them? If that is the case then that was what I did. This shows in the first attachment before mulling the units.

I want to mull a casement window with sills on each side of a door. (attachment 1) Once I mull the units I have casing replacing the window and door sills and I lose the door sill. (attachment 2) I then opened the mulled unit and rechecked exterior sills, which is a custom sill profile and lose all casing & sills around the mulled unit. As shown in the third attachment, there is a "blank area" around the mulled unit where the casing a sills should be. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong in my mulling setup? I've tried doing a search on the subject, but I'm either not "labeling" the search correctly or it has never been discussed before.

I might not be understanding the question, but why can't you just use a moulding profile to make the dome. If it is a simple dome, once the profile is made you can make it any size in width & height when brought into the plan.

I'm assuming by "shop drawings" you are referring to 2D cad. I used ACAD for years to do all my cad work. I started using CA in version 10 and have been trying to use CA's cad tools ever since to do my cad work, but at times it has been very slow and frustrating. There are many on here that will tell you CA's cad tools are just fine, but I think many of them have very little experience using other cad programs. CA was developed as a modeling program first and seems to just have "thrown" in some 2D cad tools to quiet the what they think were a few percentage of the whole users. There goal is to make the model so accurate that 2D cad isn't necessary and that's great, but I think that's a long way down the road. They MUST do more to improve their 2D cad (and 2D dimensioning). There has been many threads over time talking about this problem, but for the most part they have gone unheard (my opinion). So, to answer your question, yes you can make shop drawings in CA, but you may get very frustrated at times using it for 2D.

Perry........I did not want them grey. I wanted them black. If they are set to be black shouldn't they show as black even though the lineweight is only 1? I'm not quite sure how the lineweight got set to one. This was an older plan that I brought into X7. Not only are a lot of my lineweights wrong but 2/3's of my linetypes are not correct when I brought this plan forward into X7. This plan came from X5.

Okay, I think I found the problem. My lineweight was set to 1 for my cad lines. (?) I changed the lineweight to 18 and the lines showed black in the "Print View". To double check the problem I changed the lineweight of the dimensions to 1 and they showed as grey in the "Print View". I'm not positive, but I don't think I had this problem in previous versions. I'll have to review X5 and X6 and see if this same anomaly shows up in those versions. Does anyone else want to check this out also just to confirm it is just not my printer?

Alan.........my dpi only goes down to 300 Scott..........Shown in the attachment was how my preferences were set up-------just as you said they should be. Sorry I didn't get back to you all before this. I was called to a job site to work out a problem.

I'm not sure what the problem is because it has never happened before. I made a cad detail of a door section. All layers used and lines are black. When I did a print preview the drawing shows as having grey lines, but the dimensions are black. (attachment) I've unchecked "Print in Color" and it's still the same. I've checked my printer setup to make sure it's not to grayscale and it isn't. I'm either drawing straws at this point or I'm having a "brain fart" Am I missing something very simple? As always, all help is greatly appreciated

This is the term called "z-fighting. While you are in the camera view go to 3D-Edit Active Camera-Camera-Scene Clipping-Clip Surfaces Within. Change the default number to a number from 200" to 600". (attachment) I'm not sure why it does it on just the one monitor, but this should fix your problem

I've done many restoration projects here in northeast/central Pennsylvania over the last 40 years. Victorian homes built in the 1890's around here usually had 7/8" sheating (horizontally laid), full 2X4 ballon studding, 3/8" wood lath and 3/8" of plaster. Generally speaking the studs were on 16" centers. There has been a few occasions where the studding was on 18" centers, but around here I've never seen 24" on center wall studding from this time period. I've run into very few cases where the floor joists were not a full 8". Some were only a full 2"x 8" on 24" centers, but in better built homes they used a full 3"x 8" on 16" center. The better built homes had 7/8" to1" floor sheeting with a 13/16 T&G finished floor. Lesser built homes just had one layer of 1"- 1 1/4" T&G boards for the floor. Ceiling joist, with no floor above were usually a full 6" deep.