capitaldesigns

I just tried that. I deleted the terrain that was placed on the foundation level and drew it on the first floor level. This time instead of placing the grade 3'-5" below the sub-floor it placed it 12'-5" below the first floor sub-floor. I wanted the upper grade o be 21" below the first floor sub-floor. It is placing the grade 21" below the basement finish slab. To get the lower grade to be level with the basement finish slab I need to place the grade -111" below the first floor sub-floor. The basement slab is drawn 132" below the first floor finish floor, not -111". To get the upper grade to be 21" below the first floor sub-floor I had to show the grade as 0" below the first floor sub-floor. When I look at the structure DBX under room specification it shows that 0" elevation is still the first floor sub-floor. So why do I have to call out the upper grade to be 0" below the first floor sub-floor to get it t show up in section view as 21" below grade ? Thank you, Mike

I am working on a practice plan before working on the real project. I inputted the grade to be 21" lower than the first floor sub-floor. In section and elevation views the grade is shown 3'-5" below the first floor sub-floor. Under terrain specification it shows sub-floor height above terrain is 21". Is there some other setting pushing the grade down to 3'-5" below the first floor sub-floor ? Thanks, Mike Basement Plan.plan

I can not open your file. I get a message from CA saying that I am running an older version of CA Premier software that does not support the newer features of the .plan file...... I am running X11. A month ago I bought a new computer and downloaded X11 on this computer. At the bottom of your email it says you are also running X11. Is that correct ?

I deleted it since it was not working out. This plan was a practice plan. I wanted to use a practice plan before worked on the real plan and screwed up it up. On the practice plan I did add 6 elevation lines evenly spaced , each at one foot elevation changes. CA did not seem to follow those elevation lines. I got a big swell in the lower terrain area where it was flat before moving the terrain wall back to the terrain break line. At the top terrain area area I got a big bulge where it was a consistent even up slope. I think the best thing for me at this time is to forget the V ditch behind the retaining wall. Thanks for your help. Mike

Hi Glenn. I tried to do what you did. I drew the terrain and put in a couple of elevation lines. One at 0" elevation and the other at 10'. I drew a terrain break across the middle of the terrain. That worked. I then than drew a terrain wall along the grade break. Good. I than drew and elevation region behind the grade break line 12" lower than the grade at that point. The grade behind the wall started bulging up. Not an even slope, but not to bad. I then moved the terrain wall back to be even with the grade break line. Everything at the point went wacky. Big swells and bulges above and below the the terrain wall. I moved the wall back to where it was, but still everything was wacky. I then erased the wall, still everything was still wacky. I have no idea why moving the terrain wall back to be just in front of the terrain break line would screw up the model.

I would like it to shape the terrain so it looks right is a perspective view and section view.

Would the molding polyline follow the slope of the grade ?

I am working on a project with a slopped lot. I am putting in a 8' high retaining wall to enlarge the size of the building pad. I need to a V ditch behind the wall. I do not see a tool for that. Is there a way to show a V ditch ? Thanks Mike

I did not get a chance to try the pony wall yet. I will try later today. Thanks

Most of my project are additions and remodels. The building departments want the new footings to be hatched to distinguish them from the existing footings. We hatch new walls to distinguish them from the existing walls. Same concept.

It to bad that CA does not make it easier to hatch footings. When CA draws the garage slab it hatches the stem wall, not the footings. I would thing if CA can hatch the stem wall of the footings it would be able to hatch the footings as well.

I tried raising and lowering the SWT by " and I still do net get the hatch pattern to show up. Most of my residential projects are remodel and additions. The building departments require us to show a hatch pattern on the new footings. It looks like I will need add the hatch patterns manually. Thank you for the help. Mike

When I pulled apart the footings both the line for the outside slab and the inside footing lines both turned to solid lines. When I joined them together the inside footing line changed into a dashed line and the outside slab line remained solid as it should be. The walls did not change to invisible walls.

I just noticed that if I cut the footing in the middle of the wall and pull the footing apart by a foot or so the fill pattern shows up. When I connect the footings together again the fill pattern again disappears. Any ideas why this is happening ?

This was an automatic foundation using the build foundation tool. This is not a new problem. The only area that I can get the fill pattern to show up in the foundation plan is the garage stem wall. I also tried the straight foundation wall and the slab footing under the wall pull down menu. Still no fill pattern.

I already have it called out as a 12" wide concrete stem wall. Is there some other setting in the program that is not letting the conc. fill pattern show on the foundation plan ?

Were are you seeing the 6" concrete wall ?

I'm trying to get a conc. fill pattern in my new footings to show up on the foundation plan without success. I've added a screen shot of the foundation plan, wall type definitions, footing specification and layer fill style. I thought it added the fill correctly, but apparently I did not. Can someone let me know why the fill pattern is not showing up in the foundation plan. Thank you, Mike

I might need to call tech. support. I will let you know what I find out.

A couple of years ago someone told me an easy way to change a single dimension in a string. I should of wrote it down. I haven't needed do to this until now. I forgot how to do it.

How do you change individual dimension text in a dimension line. I have a dimension string that has a lot of smaller dimension like 1'-1", 1'-2" and 1'-3". They are writing over each other. I was told that there is a way to change individual dimensions where I could change them to read 13", 14" and 15". This way they will not be placed on top of each other. Does anyone know how to do this ? Thanks, Mike

Thank you. I see that we can create another footing type. One with the stem wall hatched (new) and the other without a hatch pattern (existing) It would be better if we could put a hatch pattern on the footing as well. Adding or subtracting a hatch pattern on the stem walls works for raised foundations, what about slab footings ? If the project you are working on has a lot of footings it could be time consuming to draw a polyline around them so you can add a hatch pattern. Hopefully CA will give us the ability to add a hatch to the footings.

How did you do that ?

I'm on X11

I am working on a room addition project with a raised foundation. Chief has a speckled hatch pattern on all of the stem walls, new and existing. I usually show this hatch pattern on new footing only. Is there a way to have the hatch pattern on new the footing and the existing footing not having a hatch pattern. The building departments require us to hatch the new footings to distinguish them from the existing footings. Thanks, Mike