GeneDavis

This is a new thread to discuss what was embedded in the previous thread about stretch planes and zones. In that topic, a Chiefer had taken a symbol, resized it to about 50 percent of original, and then wished to set a stretch plane for using it above a counter. I found it impossible to do because I could not figure out how to export the resized symbol. Try it with any pendant light in the Chief libraries. Take the symbol, let's say it is 20 x 20 inches x 40 inches high, resize it maintaining its aspect ratio to 10 x 10 x whatever, and try resetting a stretch plane so its stem will stretch. Would not work for me. You can succeed with the symbol at original size, but not after resizing. So how do you export one that has been resized, and then turn around and import it back so Chief now has a fresh look at it?

Go into your interior wall specification, and change how the wall picks up dimensions.

Go to YouTube. Many more videos there.

Please go to YouTube, search "Chief Architect Symbols" and take the time to watch the many instructional videos there. Plenty of examples of sizing and stretching there for you. That, or line up some one-on-one instruction via Skype or something.

A roof segment can have a radius, but no other curvature options are available. Curved roof segments can be joined and geometry specified so one is tangent to another, but still one is limited to circular arc geometry.

Sorry about your situation. Try this. Do your setup for your Arch D (24x36) paper but be sure to draw your outer borders nice and wide, as if the actual paper size is not 24x36, but is 22x34. Draw a border at 22x34 and think of it as your "guide" border, and draw your border inside that guide. Leave the 22x34 border there if you want, or delete it after drawing an inside border. Do all your text and dimension setups so that 1/8" is the smallest text height to be printed to your Arch D. Consider using a fairly plain font like Arial, and do all-caps, always. Then when printing your 11x17s, simply use the check print scale setting, set to 1/2. Since your D-size setup has margins drawn nicely for 22x34, everything should look good at half size and fit to 11x17.

"I am not through moving the stair tower walls . . . " Why not wait until you are done, then build stairs. Stairs with manually-specified starting and ending elevations remain stable. Have you tried that?

Post plan please.

Working at the material level, I did a wall with a brick exterior layer from the library, and edited the material pattern colors (both field and lines) so the background (field) is white, and the lines are gray. Shown here is the result of sending the elevation to layout. This has no effect on 3D views because in those, one sees the texture, and not the pattern.

Yup. A weakness, but some might say "une bug." Worth reporting, I suppose. Has it already been done? Reporting?

I just drew a four-wall building, changed the walls to out-of-box Chief-X8 stucco, then with the paint tool in object mode (one wall at a time) painted one wall another color of stucco. That is the wall on the right in the two-color image. I then went to my 3D tools and changed the spraypaint mode to "blend color with material," selected a pink, and did the wall to its left, going clockwise. The other image is the other two walls, original stucco.

You want the tool to work at the object level. Use HELP to find out how to change settings, so you can just "paint" one wall at a time. There's object level, room level, floor level, and plan level.

Each of the flare-out steps can be done as a landing. Any shape can be drawn with Chief CAD, and then turned into a landing. I just sketched out a couple of landings, one as your first step, the other as your second.

Model it up in solids, block, make symbol? Looks like Texas.

If selecting perimeter walls and specifying footing parameters is called "manually," then yes, done manually. If there's a better way, I'm all ears. Why would Chief confuse us by giving us two ways to do this?

I've done a string of jobs for a guy that builds RV barns, all of them monoslabbed, and have not used level 0. If inside thickening is needed, such as for a single load point or at a loadbearing wall, I use p-line solids and line and layer control to include them in the plan and section views.

You can get a foundation plan. Layers, line control should yield this for you. All on level 1. Here is a quickie plan with mono slab and the plan view I show has only "slabs" and "footings" turned on.

Isn't your problem created by the level 0 foundation you built? If I am building a plan with a thickened-edge slab foundation ("monolithic" meaning single-pour) I specify everything needed on level 1 and do not build a foundation under on level 0.

remodelerJK, I see this is your first post. How about you figuring out how to get a signature line in your profile so we know what version of the software you are using, maybe what you use for hardware, and more. It sure helps when dealing with questions like yours. There are various ways of modeling a sloped ceiling plane in your bathroom. Solids, ceiling planes, and roof planes can all be used to get this look.

Skype.

Thanks again, Jon.

I've a gallery loft up above the second floor, but created on the second floor. Second floor sits atop 8/0 nominal walls, and this loft floor is 60" higher. The loft looks as I want it in 2D but in 3D there is an open-below room under it, and that room generates walls I want gone. The "walls" that are appearing in 3D are under two of the three interior railing walls that define the loft above, and have a height equal to the default floor structure thickness. This "room" can be selected and opened for spec in 3D only. I cannot open such a room in 2D on floor one or floor two. What is creating this, and how is it deleted? SkinnyTrussedFixed.plan

No I am not. It is now a worse mess than before. The house has a complicated second floor, because of its multiple levels and because one bedroom has a loft area that extends over the hallway of a lower level. The big gable wall interfaces rooms at three different levels: the second floor primary level (107-3/8"), the top bedroom level (137-3/8") and the loft floor level (up 62-1/4" above its bedroom floor). I had wanted the second floor plan to include the primary second floor and the upper bedroom. I built a third floor so that the loft would model in 3D and be able to have its floor structure defined. The problem with defining the large gable wall as a pony wall (thanks, Jon) is that in plan view it needs to be broken in order to show the doors that are in it, with breaks at the doors. The break allows one to display the lower wall (drywall both sides) inside, and siding for the exterior. But doing this complicates window placement. What to do, what to do?

Thanks, again. I'm getting there.

Try another sink. A sink symbol is a special animal, one with a part of its spec defining a cutting polygon that cuts a hole in the countertop. If other sinks give the same result, then it is something wrong with your cab arrangement and counters.