-
Posts
12059 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Joe_Carrick
-
OK, so depending on the jurisdiction there can be a lot of difference in what the Building Dept can require in terms of the FAR and LC calculations. Generally, the FAR is simply the Gross Floor Area (All Floors) / Total Site Area The LC is generally the Total 1st Floor Area of all Structures plus Parking Pads & Driveways / Total Site Area Sometimes a jurisdiction also wants a Main Building Footprint Coverage which includes Deck, Porches, Paved Courts, Sidewalks, etc. What are the most common in your areas and are there any additional items required?
-
Once it's connected to a Framing Member with an Arrow it will work. It's possible for arrows to get disconnected at either end, so you might want to delete the arrow and add a new one. Options in the Text Box dbx (Add an Arrow)
-
Scott, Send me a GTM invite and I'll show you directly on-line.
-
Select the Text DropDown -> Text Macro Management. It's the same tool you would use to define a new macro
-
This is not a predefined Library CAD object. It's just the Macro itself which you need to insert into your own Text Block.
-
Scott, You have to "Import" the macro into your Plan using "Text Macro Management". DUH!!!! I suppose Chief should be smart enough to do that when you try to open a .json file but.........
-
Attached is a macro to Annotate Framing Members. It can be attached to the Label itself or it can be inserted into a Text Box for use with a Reference Arrow. Framing Member(s).zip
-
Random Stacked / Subway Tile Texture / Pattern
Joe_Carrick replied to RobUSMC's topic in General Q & A
OK, I get that to work in an Elevation View (Wall Material Region) but not in Plan (Floor Material Region). But..... It offsets every instance of that Pattern Globally. IOW, if you have 2 Wall Material Regions next to each other and you offset the Pattern in one of them you will see that the Pattern has been of offset the same amount so that they line up. What is happening is that the origin of the Hatch Pattern has been globally moved. All instances of that Hatch Pattern in the View will have been moved. The offset is not relative to the object - it's relative to the 0,0 origin of the Plan. You can of course copy the Material and make offsets for both the Texture and the Pattern - they do not automatically match - but they are both still relative to the Plan Origin, not the object they are assigned to. -
Random Stacked / Subway Tile Texture / Pattern
Joe_Carrick replied to RobUSMC's topic in General Q & A
As far as I can tell - nothing at all. You can use a custom Pattern File but you need a Pattern Definition that works. -
Random Stacked / Subway Tile Texture / Pattern
Joe_Carrick replied to RobUSMC's topic in General Q & A
The x-y offsets are only available for Textures. Patterns in Chief are relative to the 0,0 origin. Here are the basics: Textures can easily be copied and new textures with x/y offsets can be created. It requires a different texture for each required set of offsets, etc. Patterns are global in Chief based on XHatch definitions. There is no easy way to create or modify XHatch definitions in Chief. Probably the easiest way to deal with this would be for Chief to add the x/y offsets of the Pattern to match those of the Texture - but that might not give the desired result so an independent setting is probably needed. In most 2D CAD programs it was common to have a built-in Hatch Pattern definition tool and also a built-in Line Style definition tool. It was very common practice to have this done graphically. IOW, the user would draw the 2D objects as a "sample" and then the software would analyze the geometry and create the definition. Chief doesn't have a graphic definition tool for either Hatch Patterns or for Line Styles. It does have a Line Style creation tool but it is very limited - only being able to define a set of in-line segments, spaces & text. Line Style creation tools I've used in the past provided for "Off-Line" geometry and beginning and ending terminators. An example of "Off-Line" would be something similar to the "Batt Insulation" that Chief uses with Auto Detailing. Another example would be a "Break Line". -
Open the Symbol Dialog and check the Stretch Plane and Stretch Zone settings for the "z" direction.
-
The Floor Structure Material?
-
OK, I have found a way to do this but so far I am not totally happy with it since it requires a "Room" and for the "Room Label" to be displayed. Not all Plans have Rooms - for example a Plan that just contains Details would not normally include a Room. It would be a big help if there was a Global attribute $Units ("Metric" or "Imperial"). This would allow a macro to display the width, depth, length, height, area, volume, etc in appropriate format depending on what the Plan Units are.
-
Within a macro, is there a way to determine what units are being used in the Plan. IOW, is this Plan Metric or Imperial?
-
Mick, RTB = Rich Text Box IAE = In Any Event Here's the macro Framing Member(s).zip
-
OK, here's the revised macro. Replace the one in the RTB with this one. Then test it with all the other Types, not just I-Josts and Lumber. Framing Member(s).zip
-
Curt's right. Do as little as possible in Layout. Learn to work in the Plan and use Annosets and Layer Sets to get what you want sent to Layout.
-
It has been suggested and I think it's on the schedule to be fixed - but another request sure wouldn't hurt anything.
-
Perry, If the new one doesn't work then I'll post the macro and you can add it directly to a RTB. It seems that sometimes when importing a Library Object that has a macro it might not replace a macro of the same name. IAE, I have determined that it really isn't so much a connection problem as it was the fact that the macro was wrong.
-
I have replaced the Library Item. It had a problem with the macro. I was calling a Ruby function that I had in an external file. I've now added that function directly into the macro so it will now work with any Framing Member Type. The function is one that converts to Feet/Inches/Fractions. My apologies to those who couldn't get it to work with I-Joists. In reality it wouldn't have worked with anything other than Lumber. Delete the old one and download the new. Everything should work perfectly now.
-
I uploaded a new version of the CAD Block. It's named Framing Member(s). See if it works for you. Note that it has a slightly different Macro. Oops!!!! That one will definitely not work. This one will!!!! Framing Member(s).calibz
-
Just in case there was a problem with the first one - here's a new version (note that the name is different and the macro is also a slight bit different). Oops!! Try again - the first one was a bad macro. This one should work in all cases. Framing Member(s).calibz
-
Scott, I can't explain it. It works on my system consistently even using your Plan. Are both of you on Macs? Have you upgraded to the latest version of X7? Something is different and I just don't know what.
-
Scott, Move the Arrowhead to the far side of the Framing Member. See what happens then. It doesn't make any difference on my system (I can switch back and forth between Lumber and I-Joists all day and I get the correct text) but who knows - maybe the arrowhead just needs to be in a slightly different location. IAE, I would really like to know if when it fails on your system - can you connect the arrow to the TJI and get it to work right?
-
Perry, My Grid Snaps are set to 1". That's the same for Scott's Plan. I did find that Scott had "Object Snaps" turned off in the Plan he posted. I turned them on and have no problem keeping a connection.