Alaskan_Son

You're totally welcome. Its a goofy little quirk for sure.

Is this what you're talking about?

It actually works just fine. Here's a quick crappy video. Just seemed easier to demonstrate than to describe. It's kinda weird... I didn't go over it in the video, but you can move the whole window and then resize it, however you cannot just simply resize the window.

No file attached. Make sure you remember to click "Attach This File" and make sure the plan is closed before you try attaching.

Can you attach a plan that has the problem you mention? Even just a small sample of the situation?

You can import the Sketchup model into CA, but you cannot manipulate it other then resizing the whole thing and changing materials. You could also export a Chief model that can be opened in Sketchup which CAN be manipulated but it's not very practical.

If you're asking why there isn't any T1-11 in the library, there is, it's just called something else. Materials>Siding and Paneling>Vertical Paneling. I remember having a hard time finding it when I first started using Chief too.

We're cool David. Thanks.

Don't take that as disrespect David...seriously...wasn't intended that way Its just a simple fact. We're not used to younger, relatively inexperienced people here is all.

I wasn't mocking you. I was trying to offer you some sound advice. Know your place. You've been asking some extremely elementary questions...the likes of which I have almost never seen on this forum. Your questions have been poorly worded, extremely vague and unclear, and you don't know how to use punctuation. You're talking to people who have been doing what you are trying to do for as long as you have been alive and of lot of guys and gals here much MUCH longer than that. If you want to be able to communicate better here and learn some things, you can start by taking a little advice and not getting offended so easily.

Yes

Disrespect is going to get you too far at all here. I was just offering you a helping hand. I can see you must be too good for that.

In the future, you can use a number of methods to do an actual screen capture instead of taking a picture of your screen. What I usually do myself is use "Print Screen".. Most keyboards have a little button somewhere up on the top middle to right hand side of the keyboard labeled Print Screen or Prt Sc. Press that and then go into Microsoft Paint or some other photo editing software and click "Paste" (or press Control+V). Crop as necessary and/or add notes and then Save As whatever. Then attach that file to your post. There are other methods as well, but one way or another, using a "screenshot" is a lot better than an actual photo.

One more thing. Really work on trying to communicate your questions more clearly. Describe what are are trying to accomplish. When you say things like "I don't know how to do this", we really have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe ask something more like "How do I create a 2D elevation detail like this...automatically?" To which we could respond something like "Use a cross section camera, that's what they're for...duh." For what its worth, the detail you drew up with poly-lines should really only have taken 2 seconds with a cross section camera. If you would have learned the program in order though, you would have known that. Just remember that. Try to avoid the temptation to take too many shortcuts, and be prepared to focus on one thing at a time till you really get your head wrapped around it. If you don't get those little things figured out, you're going to end up with a whole crapload of things you barely understand and you'll end up fighting with Chief for the rest of your life. : )

Makes a lot more sense now. Its just unusual to have a 15 year old trying to learn how to use $2,700 software. People don't typically buy something like that if they don't have a notable amount of architectural, construction, or general life experience. And I don't say that in a negative way toward you. Just that you're outside the typical mold. Knowing a little more about who you are and where you're coming from should really help us help you a little better. Anyway, having said all that, I would recommend you take time to go through the Users Guide (at least starting with Chapter 2) and Use the Help files. They are both extremely valuable learning tools. Both can be found if you click on the Help tab at the top of the screen inside Chief Architect. The Users Guide may seem really boring, but it will guide you through all the basics. Don't underestimate learning the basics however dull they may seem.

David, You should really consider paying for some one on one training. It could really benefit you.

I'm not trying to be mean David, and I'm not trying to discourage you from learning the craft. I just think you're putting the cart before the horse. As Johnny suggested above, it really won't do you much good in the long run.

If they're your father's plans than its not suspicious. That's why I asked. I will note though that it sounds like your father didn't draw them or else you wouldn't be talking about replacing the professional architect your father is paying. If that IS the case, be careful. Just because your father paid someone to draw plans doesn't mean he bought the rights to copy their work.

Maybe a little, but no...I'm mostly curious because the nature and overall tone of your questions has been very unusual, and to be honest, the fact you're copying plans just seems suspicious. I think you aren't going about learning this trade in the proper way. You're running into a ton of roadblocks because you've skipped all the basics.

I'm really curious David, Are you a builder, a homeowner, a hobbyist, or...? And what is your goal with the plans you're copying? Are you trying to build a home of your own? Just trying to get some practice? Or....

My biggest frustration with ray traces is that we can always make them work, but as you have suggested, its similar to photography...we play with lighting and materials to get the desired affect. Problem is that I personally don't want it to "look good" all the time. What I'm after is realism, and often times the realistic settings are the ones that result in the light bleed, spottiness, and other various issues. Once adjusted to alleviate the aforementioned issues, the scene is often flat, artificial feeling, or otherwise simply unrealistic.

Nice catch guys.

I think this is just how Chief works Larry, and how most plans are set up anyway...with the floor framing being displayed on the floor below. I'm curious though are you just building ceiling framing or are you utilizing the lower half of the build framing dbx (the subfloor/build floor framing section)?

Check the Structure tab. Several of the material settings are in there. Just like when selecting a room...

I don't think its really a "template" type thing. Most Chief users do one of 2 things (just very brief descriptions)... 1. The most popular method...Draw up the as-built, create a CAD Detail From View and then use that CAD detail as a background or "mask". Search CAD mask or As-built mask and I'm sure you'll come up with a handful of threads and videos. 2. What I personally do...Create 3 different plans. First I draw up an As-Built and send any views to layout as necessary. Second, I do a Save As, create a Demo Plan, and send any views to layout as necessary. Third, I do another Save As and create a Proposed Plan and send views from that plan to layout as necessary. There's also the 3rd option of using a demolition wall type set to "no room definition" so that you can have 2 walls occupy the same space and just control their display via layer settings, but I don't think this method is very popular. To be honest, I'm not sure why as I haven't messed with it much. Might actually be a good method...not really sure.