robdyck

Members
  • Posts

    4345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by robdyck

  1. The only thing that comes to mind right away is that I would suggest some experimenting in a saved version of the file. When I've imported surveyors contour maps and converted them to elevation lines, the terrain has generated far too many elevation points and it really slows the the file down. I've had the same experience when importing terrain data from a survey. What I prefer to do is use simplified methods and manually enter the elevation data in a way that I know will keep my file operating efficiently but still represent the terrain accurately. 

    Alternatively, I may import the data in a separate file and then create a symbol that I can use for visual reference in my main plan file. But I've found that importing data, then cleaning it up / simplifying / deleting / altering for the terrain to generate efficiently in Chief can take longer than placing elevation points / lines / regions manually.

  2. Can you provide more information? Several screenshots of the problem or even better, attach the plan file! If you do this, someone will provide you with the solution almost right away!

  3.  I prefer that both lines of all arrows remain consistently parallel whenever possible. My method for adding this text is somewhat different. I make sure my arrows can't move or adjust themselves and I replicate the arrows and a text box vertically a set distance. I then adjust the angled portion of each arrow and then lastly add my text. If I need to make a vertical adjustment because of space, I either center the text on the leader line or drag the horizontal portion up/down to snap to the center of the text.

  4. 5 hours ago, ChiefUserBigRob said:

    Have any of you done this?

    Yes, working on 2 Zero Threshold project right now. Our foundations are probably quite different than yours, but I use a concrete foundation wall with a reduced thickness at the top to provide a bearing ledge for the floor framing. This allows me to bring the grade up to within 6" of the sill plate. The sill plate is directly under the floor sheathing. Generally speaking, it would be my understanding that a the top of a concrete driveway / sidewalk is not considered as grade level, but rather the substrate below it is. 

    TBH, I'm not entirely sure if your question was in regards to the building methods or sloping the terrain in Chief.

  5. From the standpoint of a builder, I'd also want to see how the slope is being achieved when all components appear to 'flat', but I realize that may be handled in a different drawing.

    I'm ok with simply noting slopes in 1/4" scale section views, but for any thing over 1/4" scale, I prefer that the slope is shown as accurately as possible.

  6. My comments would have been similar to Rene's; at that scale I'd try to be sure that the flashing components are highlighted. The roof assembly components could just as easily be identified with the callout for that assembly. Here are some of my illustrations; feel free to examine and pick apart what you like / dislike and then determine how you might adjust your detail.

     

    parapet3.jpgparapet4.jpg

    parapet5.jpgparapet1.jpg

    parapet2.jpg

    • Like 2
  7. 1 hour ago, TCB_BdnMY said:

    Any ideas?

    This has always been the case when using trusses with this type of roof configuration. If you really want the correct appearance you will need to do some manual editing. Perhaps the simplest method is to use 2 separate roof trusses, 1 for each roof plane. It still requires editing the polyline of the higher truss, but I find that a bit quicker and more stable than editing the truss framing members.

    • Like 1
  8. On 10/25/2023 at 5:24 PM, dskogg said:

    how a cabinet is actually built and replicate in ca

    In this case 'ca' could mean Canada, not Chief Architect! @dskogg and I know that a face frame cabinet is beyond extremely rare in Canada. In fact, of all the houses I've been a part of, I've never seen them so I'm not actually sure I believe any of you who say a face frame cabinet is even a real thing. You can make a picture of anything these days so that's not proof!:P

     

    Seriously though, they are not the norm in western Canada!

  9. I don't think this functions the same as what you have in mind but the distribution polyline is pretty close. In this example I made a CAD block of spiral ducting and then added that block to a distribution polyline. There are significant limitations to this and it's not a method I would necessarily recommend. There's cases where it works well and others...not so much.

     

    image.thumb.png.476d142edbe7f6199a1ded3a961c9928.png

  10. This could all be done but it would be pretty gross!

    • The spreader symbol would need to include a face material to represent edge banding.
    • Box construction: Framed
    • Separation: Max. 1/16"
    • Doors and drawers would need to be symbols with 3d offsets. And, if travelling this road, then the drawers should be modeled with a separate component to represent the front member of the drawer box. This type of cabinet construction usually has the drawer faces added to a drawer box.Cabinet Spreader.calibz

    image.png

    • Upvote 1
  11. 39 minutes ago, CharlesVolz said:

    Any additional ideas before I send this in as a request?

    In response to some of the earlier conversation in this topic; While in some ways a sloped garage floor modeled accurately may seem trivial, when designing an accessible home with an attached garage and a zero-threshold concept, the accurate modelling of the garage floor and exterior sidewalk slopes are critical. These calculations shouldn't be left for trades to make on site.

    I appreciate that you'd take the time to submit a comprehensive suggestion, Charles!

    Railing control on a per edge basis (like landings) would also be helpful to add to your suggestion.

  12. I'm with Charles, most of the time a note will suffice. When I must show a slope, there are different approaches based on your desired end result. For a ground level sloped slab that may be irregular in shape, I'll use a 3d solid. For a rectangular sloped slab that will have railing on an edge, I'll use a ramp with my own railing wall set to 'follow stairs'. For a sloped balcony that needs to be framed, I'll use a roof plane and possibly a ramp as well (to get the railing to slope). The project has to be pretty special for all this!

  13. If you zoom in, you should be able to see the label's handles separate from the fixture. Alternatively, in elevation view you can double click on the fixture and specify a label offset which will apply to that particular view. Either way, there will not actually be any CAD type of snapping to the actual label.

  14. 7 hours ago, Chrisb222 said:

    The easiest and best method IMO is to create another separate roof at the pitch of your ceiling, draw the roof beam there, then move the beam into your project.

    One can also build the framing for the vaulted ceiling and then re-size and replicate a ceiling joist / rafter downwards. Paint material, layer, etc.