kwhitt

Thanks for the reply. I am printing the camera images on ANSI A to PDF and I've never done it this way before so can't comment on the length of time. I've never included camera views in my larger ARCH D plan sets. All of the images for this particular job are using the standard renderer. I won't use PBR within Chief until they get it fixed (e.g. - glass behind glass issues). I am running into antialiasing issues in layout as well. I'm not sure why it's not working they way I though it should. I am having to open each camera view in the viewport and hit refresh each time I want to print. It was easier and much quicker when I was just printing the raw images without layout even though I had to open each one individually.

Note that the order of the images are reversed from what I describe above.

I have several camera views using the standard renderer that I want to send to layout. The aspect ratio as seen in Chief when the view is open in its own window is 1685 x 1177 (first image). This aspect ratio is 1685 x 1177 when the library, active layer display, and project browsers are all closed. When I send the view to layout, adjust the size of the layout box to my liking, and refresh the view, everything seems fine (second image). When I close the camera view or the entire file for that matter, the aspect ratio in layout changes (third image) upon refreshing or reopening. How is it possible make the layout box consistently match the camera view? As an alternative without using layout, is there a way to batch print all camera views? All of my interior jobs have anywhere from 12 to 30 camera shots. It is cumbersome to open each view individually, wait for the render to finish, and export the file. It would be nice if there was a batch printing feature. Thanks, Kevin

Hi Susan. You're welcome. Just for clarification, Visual Comfort is not offering Chief Libraries - only DWG and SKETCHUP formats I believe - both of which can be imported into Chief. The models are quite good and have saved me much time.

You're most welcome. The 2020 catalog must have belonged to 2020 if what Top Knobs tells me is accurate. Good luck in your endeavor getting more manufacturer's onboard. FYI - Visual Comfort Lighting is now offering 3D models for their newer products in case you didn't know.

Susan - we use Top Knobs for most of our kitchens and bathrooms. I have contacted their customer support and they do not have a CAD department from which to publish the 3D models. Believe me, I have asked customer support and our sales rep on many occasions. What I've been doing is modeling my own hardware with all the possible installations - attached is the list to date. I'd be glad to share the catalog or individual pieces if you'd like but I warn you that some of the models are rather poly heavy. It sure would be nice if more manufacturers would start offering 3D models. If you're like me, you have a tendency to specify those products for which you have 3D models in Chief. Kevin

Thanks Rob. You are 100% correct. I will never center my model at 0,0 again. This is actually the first time I attempted to center so no wonder I never encountered the issue before. Thanks again, Kevin

I've just noticed this behavior today while starting a new project. Although my active dimension defaults are set to be nearest 1/16", Chief is rounding up to the nearest 1/8". In the first image you can see the dimension defaults. The second image shows what I'm running into - although the dimension line states 136 7/8", when opening a segment of equal length it clearly shows 136 13/16 (which is the goal). I've also attached the file. What setting might I be missing here? Thanks! CHF_7595 Newman Rd_01-29-23_AS-BUILT.plan

Very cool symbol! Thanks!

Thanks again Doug. I really appreciate the help. I was looking at it for so long it's sometimes easy to miss something obvious. That 3rd shape was a polyline solid I used as a reference for the hole in case I needed to draw it again. Chief seems to have done a good job with these dormers. I have never had them perfect before and now I have 3 really good ones! Kevin

Thanks again Doug. You are right. There's an extra roof hole that was causing the problem. I'll be sure to look out for this in the future.

Thanks Eric. Really appreciate it!

Eric - I'm not getting the same result. Are you copying everything at once including the roof hole or just the walls? Are you using reflect about or center object? Thanks.

Thanks Doug. That did work for the exterior problems. Did you notice the wall problems on the interior? The right dormer when viewed from inside is perfect. The left, not so much. Thanks again, Kevin

Thanks for taking a look. That is how I created the 2nd dormer in the first place.

Thanks Eric. The file is only about 39MB and here's the link - https://www.dropbox.com/s/6axrhseb634eaax/TEMP.zip?dl=0 I'd appreciate you taking a look. Kevin

I have two dormers that are identical. One I was able to pull off perfectly. The second, although identical, has some artifacts that I cannot identify. I have checked the walls including attic walls, the roof planes, room moldings, etc. and I cannot find the problem, nor do I even know what those flat boards floating above my roof could possibly be. Has anyone run into this before and found a solution? Further, I don’t understand why Chief rebuilds both dormers differently although identical (as far as I can tell). I can upload the file to Dropbox if anyone has the time to take a look. Thanks, Kevin

Thanks Renee. That's a great tip!

You might be right...

Thanks Rob. That's what I ended up doing. I thought there might be a tool for extracting from elevation view. Would be nice as this is usually how the engineer presents to me. Kevin

I’ve got a set of plans from an engineer. I am attempting to approximate the terrain by tracing a line over what is drawn in an elevation view – see attached. So far so good, but there are no terrain tools available to me in the elevation view. Is there an easy way to translate this to the plan view? I have tried creating a P-Solid and deriving contour lines from it – no luck. How would you go about doing this? It does not need to be perfect - only an approximation. Thanks, Kevin

It's the standard renderer in 60 FPS. I am going to try XVid to see if there's any improvement. I have to lower the brightness of my computer monitor as lately it has been hurting my eyes. It's probably washed out on a standard screen. Will changing the compression rate have any effect? I'm using the default 75%. Happy Fourth!

It's still choppy. Here's the link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/141nt68eh28htl0/Rice Orbital Walkthrough_Existing Home_07-01-22.wmv?dl=0

Not Z-fighting. I will bump up to 60 FPS and see what happens. Thanks!