Joe_Carrick

Offset should be 0

Bounding Box y should also be 0

However, I find that placing a Dishwasher or Trash Compactor or a Wine Refrigerator on a wall at 45 degrees is pretty much impossible.  I will investigate further and report my findings to Chief.  I suspect it's a problem with any angle other than 0 and 90.

1 hour ago, Steve_Nyhof said:

All fixed up and back in the library. Now I hope they don't change something that messes it up 

BTW,  You really should modify those Cabinet grouping (Architectural Blocks) so that the Dishwashers are not inserted into a cabinet.  X17 treats DWs as being installed between cabinets vs in a cabinet - just like they ar installed/built in a kitchen.

45 minutes ago, Arnold1955 said:

By the way, I started with version (4)

Version 4 or Version X4 ?

Those are 2 very different things.  I Started with version 9, 9.5, 10, X1......

2 hours ago, Steve_Nyhof said:

Not working for me

Steve, You don't even need to regen the 2D.  All you need to do is edit the y offset of the bounding box to 0.

The other option is to just delete the cabinet and place the dishwasher from the library.  X17 symbols work correctly when placed that way.  You will have a countertop above the dishwasher - or you can create a custom countertop over all the cabinets and the dishwasher.

FWIW, in X17 a Dishwasher doesn't insert into a cabinet.  It is placed instead of a cabinet and the countertop generates on top of it..That way the Dishwasher is placed correctly in the plan view.

But any existing plans brought into X17 at this time will need to be fixed.

I can confirm this, not only for dishwashers but also for wall ovens in cabinets.

I had to open the object and set the bounding box y-offset to 0.

I've submitted a bug report.

Does anyone have a good set of stair connection details showing top and bottom of various conditions?

Apparently it's programmed to be offset to one side, maybe even a little more.

You shoudlprobably report this to Chief as a "Bug".

Try rebuilding the wall framing

AFAIK, that's just no longer available.  Maybe it will be for the final release but I suspect they eliminated it for the Project Manager.

Most drives today are fast enough that a ram drive wouldn't make much difference for undo speed.

A named material would work.  Personally, I have a text file with spacing and other framing defaults that I read to set $Global values that my framing label macros use.

It's not very elegant but it works for most framing members. 

I suppose you could have a few special objects that when placed (and sized - perhaps by setting the length between joists, etc) would set the spacing as a $Global value.  You would need one for each different type or role of framing member.

Another option would be a custom field "Spacing" that you could assign to the framing members individually so referenced macros could pick up the values.  It could assign the $Globals depending on the "role".

What DPI setting are you using for the PDF?  

16 minutes ago, DBCooper said:

@Doug_N As far as I know, those "handrail options" only work with the handrail you get along a wall.

 

So what happens if you create a room divider wall along those edges of the stairway?

Thanks Rene,

My way of getting the path to the project has historically been different, relying on different NVPs.  Your explanation should help me revise this - still resulting in a $global.

It will take me a little time to ensure that it's working.

See you at Couer d,Alene in August.

Hi Rene,

This was a great video.  Chief should have hired you to do their PM online presentation.

I've over the years always kept my projects in Chief Version specific Folders with Project sub-Folders.  I guess I'm going to need to bring everything forward to X17 if I'm going to use PM.  I'm a little reluctant - especially with Beta - due to the risks of getting something messed up.

IAE, do you have any suggestions for this?  Should I keep my old Folder system and just use PM for current projects and older projects that become active again?

Thanks

1 hour ago, Renerabbitt said:

I've brought this up before in other threads where you mention this and I haven't seen a response.. I know its not perfect but it does work if you give a static main projects directory and then search for your project by project name. I am able to find my csv files from the project and plan name nvp's in that way automatically so long as I give a static master projects directory

Seems a bit complicated.  Can you show screen shots of this setup or a video?

Doug,

The key is to extend the handrails the same 1/2 tread dimension and specify "No Transitions".

3 hours ago, Renerabbitt said:

Joe I am curious, I keep giving a method for this, I am able to read..I have never checked write, and I am using PM.
My main gripe is no NVP for the folder tags

My problem is the text files are in my plan folder and I don't have a way to identify that in the PM.  If they were just in a fixed Windows Folder it would work but in my use case they have to be in a project specific folder.  I didn't see a way to get that.  The NVP is probably what's missing.

52 minutes ago, VHampton said:

After spending some time with Chief Architect X17’s new File Management system, I’ve decided to opt out — and I wanted to share why, in case it resonates with others who work solo and value simplicity.

Hi Val,

I'm in the same boat but I have additional problems with the PM.  One major problem is the inability to read/write external files with Ruby.  I hope CA will fix that and simplify the PM.  If so I might use it - but I'm not holding my breath.  

BTW, the PM also causes some problems with timing of macro operations.

Here's what I use:

The Main Text Style controls the Callout and the above line and below line take care of the others.  Here's an example:

I have this set in defaults for Layout Box Labels so it's automatic for anything I send to Layout.

Some of the macros are for other things labeled in Elevations and Sections (wall finish materials, etc) that depend on the view type.

For smooth transitions of handrails the landing would need to be extended 1/2 tread each way ("L" shape).  It's just simple geometry which would make the rails meet at the inside corner of the landing.

53 minutes ago, Ringos said:

Joe. Let's try to answer questions on the forum in complete sentences and give the person a complete solution. This will save people time and make the forums more helpful. If you have a solution, share it.

Hi Ringo,

He asked a simple question and I answered it.  Here's what's in the Core Library Catalog.

There's no need to make a new material.  In fact, I believe there is at least one wall type that can be used as a stem wall.  I have many CMU wall types in my default plans.  I don't recall if I defined those or if they were included in Chief's OOB installation.

Yes

You will need to re-migrate.  I'm not sure of the exact steps and you might need to be in PM mode.

I'm attending the UGM this year.  My wife and I will be arriving in Coeur d'Alene on Monday 8-25.  There's a reception on the 26th but there's no mention of where or what time.  Does anyone know the details?