yusuf-333

Members
  • Posts

    682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by yusuf-333

  1. If I use the transform replicate tool I can scale such a line - but you are saying "concentric mode".  Does the transform replicate tool work for you?

     

    added- ok, I just used the concentric mode and selected (lasso) all the points and was then able to scale keeping proportions. 

    Thanks johnny

    In the transform replicate tool you can do do it but for multiple copying you can't maintain equidistant polygons with broken segment proportioned. The other option "multiple copy tool "you can get a number of concentrically spaced polygons but the breaks will not proportion.

    So I got a some sort of answer to polygons of equal sides, just block it and use multiple copy tool holding C. And select all at one marque then click unblock. Again for rectangles you can trick it by blocking it enclosed by square. You get some interesting results if keep playing with it.

  2. Yusuf,

     

    Still no consistent riser heights.

    Sorry Glenn, actually wasn't expecting this response. I already mentioned the imperfection of the arithmetics. I was talking about the possibility and also forwarding you and other advanced users to think of any idea to get more control over this. But I am not advising all users to this method because I have already defined an easier workflow using the normal stair tools. Hopefully I will have the chance to get in to it after a while. But look at this plan, as you see the brown control and the actual riser heights. Shoot a cad detail and check the tolerance....but obviously a potential area of chief to research on.

    post-2517-0-72208100-1445012475_thumb.jpg

    stair follow terain reser controll.plan

  3. Yusuf,

     

    Those riser heights are not consistent - they vary height with varying terrain slope.

    Glenn you are right and I couldn't realize when I found it could be done. A little thought of some workflow in chief can make us accomplish the task. Here is it! Hopefully OK. Shall I attach the plan or wait if some needs to tweak.Further more, I am thinking that it is very easy to accomplish it with normal stair, it will for sure. I will try it tomorrow.

    post-2517-0-70867600-1444952732_thumb.jpg

  4. Here is an other way of niche insert in walls, in chief workflow is an other important factor to effectively use the tools provided so far. Last time we have seen two walls forced on top of an other wall, that process is avoided by using copy to clip board.

    Steps

    1 place the wall

    2 copy to clipboard

    3 apply material region on wall

    4 paste hold position and insert the niche(made from window) as explained last time.

    For shower niches with no casing or framing use pass thru window with no casing no frame etc.....

    Here is a video on this concept.

    https://youtu.be/GKlhRCW6Y5A

  5. Niches should be part of the program, and

    I AGREE!

    work like a window, except Sheetrock on the back should remain instead of cutting a wall through... this should an option added to a window DBX where you can select a niche (no need for sophisticated programming to do that). This way you have your headers and framing automatically adjusted.

    This is a much needed feature to be added, since its being used in almost any bathroom design, stairway design, or hallway design, etc and you shouldn't have too drop walls on top of walls and dealing with other time wasting steps.

    BUT UNTILL THEY ADD IT, ADOPTING THE BEST WORKFLOWS ARE MUCH IMPORTANT FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE, I HAVE AVOIDED THAT STEP "FORCING THE TWO WALLS" BY SIMPLY JUST A SINGLE WALL AND CLIPBOARD POWER. HERE IS A VIDEO. THIS IS EXACTLY HOW YOU SUGGESTED.JUST A PROCEDURE AND ALL IS WELL.

  6. Draw a cad line to guide your direction of move and use point to point move by using the ends a of the line as a base point. The transform replicate object may be also helpfull to achieve what you asked, but holding CRL and moving ortho freely would be nice. I don't know if that exactly exists.

  7. Wait, wait.. I am assuming that Scott was telling me a command that gives the polyline without getting in to the backlip crossection process . Am I right? you know, I some times not understand the tough English. Or else that method doesn't have any limitations for any type of crossection. .....OK I got it, it has that limitation and more.

  8. I swear,  Joe is always busting my chops,  notice that Joe talked about a MOLDING PROFILE,  he did not talk about a MOLDING,  so Joe is moving the line in the sand......  you  lost this one Joe.

     

    The question was can we convert a molding to a solid.

    "View section camera of the molding and make a cad detail of it, then connect the cad detail to be polyline and paste it back in to section view. After that, convert it to p solid with depth you like and make it a solid. It works with 2 or 3 extra clicks only comparrd to your assumed workflow."

    This what I was typing before I checked the new posts and seen that Joe posted it right.