Gawdzira

Members
  • Posts

    2149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gawdzira

  1. Hello Bernie,

     

    I am a seeking services voyeur but too busy to take on your project. I wanted to throw out an idea for you to consider on your plan. When the dishwasher door is open, it intersects with where you want to stand at the sink. Maybe you have had a design like this in the past that worked for you but it looks like it could be a problem area that could use some adjustment.

     

    Regards

    Alan

  2. This has been an ongoing issue for me to beg an electrician to fill out this form. If you find someone who is willing to do this as a consultant, please share that contact. I have a client right now who is an electrical contractor, I could barely get him to fill it out. I had to send him a paint by numbers form from one of the local jurisdictions. See attached.

     

    By the way, using this form on a sub 1000 s.f. house, I still needed a 200A service. The house has only about 550 s.f. of living area and a small basement/laundry room. 

    job_aid_10__electrical_panel_calculations.pdf job_aid_10__electrical_panel_calculations sample filled.pdf

  3. Thank @solver. I had no idea that I could type in 8 in 12 for the angle input. I would click 5 times to get the pitch to convert to angle and copy that number and then....

     

    Maybe the answer to the big question about why CA does not cut the ceiling hole properly is the lag time you got from a cut up ceiling plane. It would slow the plan to a crawl with a ceiling full of can lights.

  4. Personally, I use an L shaped line with text. If there is not space above the roof plane to place the indicator, a triangle shape can appear to be an architectural element and create confusion. I minimize my use (as shown) but some local jurisdictions require them on elevations. Big props for visual fog to distinguish between the existing and the addition.

    image.thumb.png.f99f3814e1a5482a9f4edc5d4778ecad.png

  5. I have always been frustrated with more complex roofs and getting the overlapping roof planes to read correctly. On this plan I did an orthagonal camera view and overlayed that with the roof plan with custom text for roof pitch indicators. This is probably me new method to get it to read well without a lot of cad work on the roof plan view.  image.thumb.png.02132fec41a8aaa65c17677fafcad8e8.png

    • Like 1
  6. I am not really sure what your question is since what I am seeing is the roofs connecting. I do have a question though. Can you eliminate the change in the massing where I have circled it? The building already has a lot of complexity and this spot looks like it needs some simplification which would possibly clean up some of the mashing of roof lines above this spot.

    image.thumb.png.cbabbfe4f917950b0509aa600747d227.png

  7. I have been seeing this happen quite a bit in x15. In the image I had a dimension string at 6' and +/- 4' to the walls. I was adjusting the walls using the dimensions. Once I hit the dimension to move the 4' section, the dimension string lost the 6' segment and became a 10' segment. I realize that 10' is greater than 6' and we should all shoot for greatness but in this case, I am not feeling great about the behavior.

     

    Plan file

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/v3zeso7hz8h22h7/CAP AS BUILT V1.plan?dl=0

     

    image.thumb.png.38ecec7fe1bcb274cfbb5d77cd96dd31.png